Kate Middleton may be happy with her 18-karat hand-me-down sapphire sparkler, but the same can't be said of other women in long-run relationships. Ah, the ring, that lasting symbol of love. Or is it? These days, having the right sparkler is as important as having the right man -- which is why more and more happily married women are altering, upgrading and even trading in their rocks for a new and improved ring-finger stunner.
The reasons are as varied as the methods, whether to commemorate a momentous anniversary -- like actually making it to the 10-year mark, which is no small feat in this country -- or snag what's being called a "pushing present" for the birth of a baby. According to Engagement Rings, one popular upgrade is a three-stone ring to symbolize a couple's past, present and future.
Regardless of the ring-reinvention route you choose, it's all about forgoing tradition and going for the all important fifth C: change. Just look at these women and their before-and-after twinkling transformations.
The Family Jewels
When Danielle Liss's grandmother passed away, she inherited two of her granny's diamond rings. For the 34-year-old Liss, whose husband proposed with a ruby solitaire, it seemed like the perfect opportunity to honor her grandmother by having the diamonds combined into one (five-stone!) ring. "I told my husband that I thought there was no greater symbol than the rings of a woman whose marriage lasted for 59 years, only to be parted by death," says the Las Vegas–based Liss, who plans to someday renew her vows with the new family heirloom.
What's old ...

... is new again:

Bigger Isn't Always Better
The decision to alter her engagement ring came easily for Valerie Zucker. "My solitaire is raised so high that I always felt it was getting in the way of day-to-day activities," says Zucker, who lives in Boca Raton, Fla. "When I found out I was pregnant, I asked my husband if he'd mind getting a ring that wouldn't get in the way of caring for the baby. Of course, at 40, I couldn't exactly put a Mickey Mouse ring on my finger." The solution was a blindingly brilliant eternity band. Zucker is pleased: "It's equally beautiful and can be easily worn in the boardroom and the baby room."
What's old ...

... is new again:

And Baby Makes Three
Katherine Huang of Cambridge, Mass., decided to "tweak" her engagement ring shortly after her son was born. "The night before I went into labor, I slammed a closet door on my hand and my ring is what kept me from breaking my finger. Unfortunately, the ring was bent so badly that I had to cut it off," says Huang, 32. "Since it had to be fixed anyway, I gave it a more streamlined look, with a more integrated center stone and side stones that come up directly to the main diamond." But that's not all -- Huang also got what she calls her third "baby" ring, a ruby flanked by moon-shaped diamonds to celebrate the birth of her son. "Soon it will be time to design a 10th-anniversary gift," she adds. "My guess is jewelry!"
What's old ...

... is new again:

Liz Ozaist has an affinity for sparkly stones. Her most cherished piece of jewelry, next to her engagement ring, is a sapphire solitaire that she received from her late father and wore on her wedding day.












Comments:
Add a comment
Thursday 02 December
By Judy D.
Here's an excellent mathematical way to predict the success of your marriage. This rarely fails, and you can apply the formula to your own ring or someone else's:
.2424 divided by the weight of your diamond in carats.
The resulting number is the chance your marriage will be successful. (So if your result is.224, for example, you'll have a 22.4% chance of success of "'till death do us part.")
Reply
Sunday 05 December
By joyful
the first comment was obviously just in jest...about as accurate as astrology...
come on girls, lighten up. by the way, have been married 53 years and got
a new band on our 25th...still love it.
Sunday 05 December
By Shari
OK - I got 9696, which according to your calculations, means I have a 96.96% chance of making it to "til death do us part." (Yes, I have a quarter carat solitaire, which means more to me than any multi-carat rock ever could, and gave me a division factor of .25.) Given that we've been married for 34 1/2 years at this point, with no intentions of changing anything, I'd say that's pretty accurate!
Sunday 05 December
By Katie
So, to get a 100% chance, your stone has to be .10 or below. How ridiculous. Married 18 years with a 1.56 carat stone. No beatin', no cheatin'. Where's you formula for THAT?
Sunday 05 December
By EV
OK. So how do I decide how long my marrige will last considering my engagement ring was a gold rose ring, bear in mind that was 40 yeears ago? We bought a house instead of a fancy diamond. I now have several diamond rings but I treasure my rose ring more than all the rest.
Monday 06 December
By speweth
You are a freakin Idiot
Monday 06 December
By amanda
my best friend got no diamond when she married....she just hit the 16 yr mark with her husband...so whatever with your prediction
Thursday 02 December
By vizslvr
So the bigger your diamond, the smaller your success of marriage until death, Judy? Yeah, that makes a TON of sense. Communication, trust, compatibility, common life goals, etc. are all meaningless.
Anyway, I think this is a great idea. My dad bought my mom an "upgrade" for Christmas after about 15 years of marriage and she had her old ring made into a beautiful pendant for a necklace.
Reply
Friday 03 December
By Allison
"These days, having the right sparkler is as important as having the right man..."
I know this was in jest, but it still bothered me. It really bugs me that so much of our culture's humor depends on worn-out stereotypes like this... Are we never going to move past the notion that all women are obsessed with shiny objects? Sigh.
I'm not knocking this article as a whole, by the way. It was well done. I'm just getting fed up with gender-trope jokes like this.
Reply
Friday 03 December
By CrmnsnSrfr
The idea of this seems a little tacky to me. Not necessarily all the stories here- I think the one where the woman having the baby needed something more functional is totally understandable- but shouldn't your wedding rings be about more than how much bling you can jam on one finger? It's sort of the same way I feel about women who insist on picking out their own ring. I get that you are the one who has to wear it, but I just feel like it means so much more when your ring is what your husband researched, shopped around for, and ultimately wanted you to have.
I'm not going to knock people getting rings for their anniversary if that's the gift they get. I guess my problem isabout woman asking for something bigger and better than what they were given. I feel like deep down most men in that situation are going to have hurt feelings, even if they don't show it.
Reply
Sunday 05 December
By angelofmuzick
I agree with you up to a point...my husband asked for my input before the ring-shopping took place. But the final decision was his, and his alone. And I LOVE what he picked out for me...it proved how well he knew me, AND it didn't break the bank...I would have HATED that. The best part is that it matches beautifully with the wedding band that my father had slipped onto my mother's hand 50 years before...and that was totally unplanned!!! Several months after the proposal, my mom asked if I'd like to have it. (My father has passed away.) I thought it was a wonderful omen, and I look forward to spending the next 50 or 60 years with him.
Sunday 05 December
By ksg
If most men had good taste what you said would apply. However, they don't. You have to wear it, you have to like it. Get the bling! Otherwise wife #2 will!
Friday 03 December
By Judy D.
You're exactly right, viz. That's EXACTLY the point. The more you care about about a big diamond, the less likely you are to care about communication, trust, compatibility, common life goals, etc. And that's what's really important. If you care more about how big your diamond is, how much it impresses your friends, or how a 1.5 carat diamond must mean he loves you twice as much as a .75, then you're headed for a divorce. The happiest couples I know--ones who have been married for a long time and still have amazingly great relationships--either have tiny diamonds or just simple gold bands.
Reply
Sunday 05 December
By mistressofpimp
I am absolutely disgusted by this article. What happened to marrying for love? Not these days, oh hell no--it's "what can he buy me?" Not only is it sad, it's sickening. And before some gold digging she wolf feels the need to ream me out for my stance, save your alcohol-laden breath, bitch. I married the love of my life and my rings are a family heirloom, which makes them worth more than any of you miserable skeeves are going to see in your lives.
Reply
Sunday 05 December
By Anne
I think the article about Danielle Liss is stupid. She should be wearing the ring that her husband gave her and wears her grandmother's ring on the other hand. There is no substituion for a wedding/engagement.
Reply
Sunday 05 December
By Abuela
My spouse proposed to me with a small solitaire, after I made it clear that I would absolutely NOT want a larger stone. Unfortunately, a year later we had so much chaos in our lives that I took it off for a year. Fortunately we worked through the chaos, but I chose to have the ring reworked, first because the original setting was relatively high and was frequently getting in the way, and second because I wanted it to reflect that this was a new beginning. We used the same band, but reworked it to lower the diamond and flank it with two slightly smaller sapphires (diamond is my birthstone, sapphire is Spouse's birthstone). I'm very pleased with my ring now being far less physically intrusive -- and equally pleased with my Spouse, now nine years after our original engagement.
On my right hand I wear my beloved Granny's wedding band.
I find it absurd that so many people seem to equate how much they're loved with the size of their diamonds. That's just total nonsense, and is a fabrication created by the jewelry industry that way too many people have bought into (quite literally).
Reply
Sunday 05 December
By Suz
When my husband ask me to marry him he gave me a quarter carat ring. I wore it with my gold band for 30 years and never wanted anything more. He did get other rings for me throughout the years, but I never took off that band, it meant everything to me. We had 30 years together before he left this world. No one will ever take his place.
Reply
Sunday 05 December
By shane
My husband left this world after 27 years and that was just 8 months ago I know exactly what your talking about The pain and sadness are like no other I carry on but will never marry again I have a family tht needs to now and I refelct on our life every day I see him in the clouds He's my guaradian angel
Sunday 05 December
By vernie
Suz I understand how you feel. I always wear my 54 year old wedding ring
even though it's missing one of its very very small diamonds. My sweet hubby gave me a much more expensive ring for our 24th, but my original is the one
i'll wear forever. By the way we rec'd a set of pots & pans with the original and one of those pots is still in use also. So bigger is not always better.
Sunday 05 December
By Evrblue
I love what you said. When my husband Jack and I married we had very little money, and I got a (very) small diamond band. We only had 8 yrs of wonderful marriage together before he lost his battle with leukemia. I loved my ring then, and I love it more now, and will never replace it with another. I have Jack's wedding band on a chain around my neck. He is and will be my one and only. And guess what? I get lots of compliments on my "dainty" ring. :)