According to a recent DoubleX article on Slate, Dutch women have cracked the work-life-balance code. They are happier, well-adjusted human beings who "work half days, meet their friends for coffee at 2 p.m., and pity their male colleagues who are stuck in the office all day."They would pity me, too. Two weeks ago, I started a full-time job after three years of work-from-home freelancing. (I have chronic grass-is-always-greener syndrome.) They would most certainly pity me as I worked up a sweat speed-walking home from the subway in order to capture every last remaining minute of the day with my 3-year-old and husband.
Do the Dutch possess the answer? Can women really have it all, or are we attempting the impossible, as these underemployed European women prove?
That's the deal here in America.
If you want a steady paycheck, you work. Leaving at 5 p.m. is pretty much off the table, too. But these ladies in the Netherlands are leaving long before the clock strikes five. They are a culture of part-timers. According to DoubleX, "Though the Netherlands is consistently ranked in the top five countries for women, less than 10 percent of women here are employed full-time."
In fact, the government can't get these ladies to work. Turns out, the women and their partners -- and the women's employers -- are satisfied with the part-time female work culture. To that end, a law was passed in 2000 mandating that women have the right to cut back hours at their jobs without repercussions from employers.
Here's the catch: Over there in the Netherlands (aka Happyland), women are responsible for only a small portion of the household income. Their partners bring home the rest. (Yes, those poor men whom the Dutch women pitied.) A-ha! So that's why this all works out so neatly.
As I see it, there are two things stopping me -- and probably many more American women like me -- from living the Dutch dream: I have never found a reduced-hours position, and my husband does not make enough money. Our family needs my full-time salary to get by.
And trust me, I have tried to get creative. In my three years of freelancing, I applied to a handful of jobs. At first, when the freelance work was steady -- and I had nothing to lose -- I asked if the full-time position I was up for offered a flexible schedule, maybe some work-from-home hours?
After that backfired several times, I learned to keep quiet, so as not to seem lazy or unenthusiastic. Hiring managers here want to see a driven, passionate candidate, and asking for Fridays from home was the kiss of death. (I'm more than willing to log in evening hours. Anyone who hires a mother and offers her some flexibility will see amazing productivity.) So I stopped asking, sucked it up, and got a standard-issue full-time position.

As for needing a full-time salary, I'll say this: No one forces me to live in New York City. I choose to, and with that comes myriad expenses and price jack-ups. But I love it here, and I love raising my daughter here.
I once interviewed a very smart and inspiring woman, Jill Blashack Strahan, who explained, "As a mom, it is really a myth to think we can have it all. But I have learned that we can have bites of it all."
The founder of Tastefully Simple, a gourmet prepared-foods site, went on to add, "Here's a hard truth: When we say yes to something, we say no to something else. We don't have an infinite amount of space and time, and ... it all comes down to what you want and making very intentional choices."
I made my intentional choice: After three years, I'm putting my career ahead of my daughter, at least for a little while. Because balance is just a myth; choices are the reality. But do I secretly wish I were in the Netherlands, chatting with friends over coffee and not worried about money or work or life in general? Ja. (That's Dutch for "yes.")
Maureen Dempsey is a frequent contributor to Lemondrop. Her daughter Clemens is now 3 and doesn't yet want to be Dutch. More great stories:
-"Should I Get Married For Health Insurance?"
- 30 Things I Wish I'd Done Before I Turned 30
- What Your Baby's Name Says About You













Comments:
Add a comment
Thursday 18 November
By Ronnie
Our family needs my full-time salary to get by.
and that's the problem.... you must live in America.
Reply
Thursday 18 November
By Mike Davis
And therein lies the rub - "my family needs my full time salary to get by" This is the same attitude as the government; instead of cutting costs ie, a smaller house, an older car, less dinners out, most of us live outside our means.
Thursday 18 November
By lisa
We have only ourselves to blame. We have driven the cost of everything up. We want higher salaries so that we can "have it all" so that cost is passed to the consumer. Thus, making the need to make more money...etc. It's a viscous cycle but Ameican greed started it. News flash, WE DO NOT HAVE TO HAVE TO HAVE EVERYTHING!
Thursday 18 November
By Eva
No, Lisa... it's more like a little thing called inflation, which happens when government (ahem... Obama) spends trillions of dollars we don't have, and then churn out more money into the economy that doesn't really exist, lowering the value of the dollar. As a result, prices of EVERYTHING increase. Then, in order to pay for living (not fluff stuff - things you need to survive), we need higher salaries.
Also, "green" technology that is costing way more that it's making isn't helping either. Like putting "renewable" energy sources into gas - ethanol. It costs SO much money because you have to grow the corn to make it, and that increased the price of gas. So now gas is more expensive, which means everything that needs to be shipped in a semi truck - which is basically everything in the supermarket/mall/etc, is more expensive. Now you're using a lot more corn as well, increasing the price of it. Fantastic. So you've got this vicious cycle moving towards an increasing price. Oh, and don't get me started about how growing a bunch of corn - and farming in general - is really not all that green of a process.
Another example - wind turbines. Apparently they need to stay in motion, or they will rust and freeze up. 40% of the time, they generate electricity, 60% of the time they USE electricity to stay running. Really engineers? Come on!
Newer cars are another example. Thanks to government for making this green movement in cars, they are starting to introduce high tech chips into engines to be able to tell if one little thing is wrong with it - and when it isn't functioning at 100%, your car will not pass inspection, and you'll have to pay hundreds, even thousands, to "fix" it. My husband just got done talking to a mechanic who told him don't go buying a new car anymore, because when it breaks, you'll go broke - which we are seeing now with our $400 bill to reprogram some stupid chip that broke in my husband's engine. Running fine, but that $400 piece of green $@#$% is broken.
I am all for a better planet, and all for helping people out who need it (govt programs), but what we're doing right now is running ourselves into the ground - and the consumer is not the one doing it! Frankly, we need consumers to spend more to help the economy - but that's hard to do when you've either got no job, or you're forking over a fourth or more of your salary to pay for Obama to spend MILLIONS of dollars to take a trip over to India, or fund some stupid, cost INeffective "green" program.
Thursday 18 November
By Keith J. Mohrhoff
Eva: While it IS true that you can't get something for nothing, (and I hope/think that nobody expects that), you are wrong about windmills only generating power 40% of the time and rusting/freezing if not kept moving with electricty the other 60% of the time. Among the things you fail to take into account is; A) the Dutch have been using windmills for graineries, textile mills, etc. for hundreds of years before the discovery of electricy, B) farmers here in the U.S. have been using windmills for many years because they were/are in remote areas where public utilities are/were unavailable, unreliable or too expensive, C) today's materials are non-corrosive and sealed bearings plus self-lubricating mechanisms (the latter being around for 100 years), mean that rust/oxidization is not among the challenges involved with wind power.
Another thing to keep in mind is that in oil-producing countries, the price of gas averages around 50 cents a gallon. The reason we are charged so much more is that there has not been any competition to the product they sell. If enough infrastructure is developed to make alternate fuels a serious competitor in the energy market, we will see the pendulum start to swing the other way!
Thursday 18 November
By Rafterman
WHY WOULD YOU NOT WANT TO BE DUTCH , BETTER HEALTH CARE SLOWER PACED LIFE. SOME IDIOT SUGGESTED WE NEED HIGHER PAYING JOBS, QUITE THE OPPOSITE , THEY NEED TO BE LOWER PAYING TO COMPEATE IT TODAYS MARKET. WE NEED TO GO BACK TO MAKING IT IN THE USA . AN EMPLOYED AUTO WORKER MAKING 14 BUCKS AN HOUR IS BETTER THAN ONE WHO IS SITTING ON THE SOFA.
Thursday 18 November
By Phil Van Eck
I'm Dutch and always wanted to be Italian. Go figure.
Thursday 18 November
By Medusa
Keith: If modern windmills do not rust, why are there large numbers of rusting windmills in Holland, of all places. The original Dutch windmill, was built of wook and was individually maintained - on a daily basis, by its resident owner. The maintainance is also true of windmills used on American farms. The procedure does not work for windfarms, unfortunately. By the way, self-lubricating technology has NOT been around since 1910!
As for gasoline, you are even more wrong. In the first place, oil-producing countries subsidize the price of gasoline for their citiens as one of the national benefits. In the US, the price of gasoline is tripled or quadrupled by various taxes imposed by all levels of government. As for the question of competition, as long as we need to obtain concessions from foreign governments, only the very largest companis can deal on the market.
Thursday 18 November
By NeonDU
Funny????? I don't see any mention of the ($3500 dollars, not euros) it takes to get a driver's license in Holland. So most women (and many men) don't have cars or even drive. And it just starts there. Yeah, it IS always greener!
Thursday 18 November
By NeonD
That's funny!!!! I don't see any mention of the ($3500 dollars, not euros)
it takes to get a driver's license in Holland. So most women (and
many men) don't have cars or even drive. And it just starts there.
Yeah, it IS always greener!
Thursday 18 November
By Satch
Right on, Lisa!
Thursday 18 November
By Cuemiller
Now, Eva, really someone has been feeding you a load of hooey, Inflation under the current administration is so low that economists are worrying about "stagflation" and negative inflation instead of high inflation. Your windmill comments are totally wrong -- simply not true in any way. There are some problems ineed with wind powe but not what you say. Just totally off the mark here. Finally, ask any mechanic and he or she will tell you that today's autos are far superior to autos in the recent past. In fact, technicians complain that they are losing business because the new cars do not need the service and repair that cars of old did! You sound like a small-government advocate anxious to turn any comment or story into some reason to attack Obama. Geeze at least get your facts straight instead.
Thursday 18 November
By cleanfreaks2
Yes, these socialist countries are horrible.
Thursday 18 November
By Ratchetjaw
In America we want, want, want. A bigger house than the neighbors, more than one car and new at that. Just all the toys the magazines and commercials convince us that we should have. It is no wonder a woman has to work full time. If this downturn in the economy does not teach us the difference between want and need nothing will. Good luck trying to gather up all the toys you do not actually need.
Reply
Thursday 18 November
By Vince
Well said. The time is rapidly approaching when the average working American will get over the idea that he is entitled, simply by being an American, to all that you pointed out, and more. We must find other ways to live contented lives, than accumulating more possessions than the next guy. Their is some hope, though, with the recent declines in credit card and other unsustainable personal debt.
Thursday 18 November
By C
Not everyone is like that. My husband and I live in a house that is about half the price of what we were told we could afford, specifically because we don't believe in the lies that companies like freddie mae were telling people about what they could afford in a house. Both of our cars are completely paid off, in fact, I paid for mine in cash as I always do when I buy a "new" car (I always buy used), and my husband's has been paid off for over a year. We don't make a lot of money either - I'm in school right now spending thousands of dollars (I haven't had to take out loans yet) - and what my husband makes barely puts us in the middle class bracket. The only debt we have right now is our tiny mortgage, and the last little bit of my husband's school debt. We pay off our credit cards on time every month, so we have no credit card debt. And with our budgeting, we usually manage to still save a little bit every month, barring a dip for medical expenses or at the beginning of the semester when I have to pay for tuition and books.
Things are tight, and we do have to pick and choose what we want to put our money towards, but really, we want for nothing. We go on vacations when we want to, we have our beloved pets - one that weighs almost as much as I do, we'll be starting a family soon, we've got all the normal american gadgets like a ps3, big screen tv, laptops, etc. The key is, we budget and we wait until we can afford things before we run out and buy them. And we shop when we need things - not as a hobby. We are very blessed! And also thrifty. :)
Thursday 18 November
By Gretchen
My husband and I stopped using credit cards over a year ago and pay cash for what we buy. By doing this, we have no debt other than a house payment and we pay cash for cars. All extra money goes into savings in one form or another that at one time use to go to pay off credit cards. As a result, I work 3 hours a day and have time to do the things I want to do. I'm home when my husband comes home from work and we have more time to spend with one another. We don't buy what we don't need and pay cash for what we do need.
Thursday 18 November
By gail
yes, you said it right there, you are putting your career ahead of your 3 year old daughter. Wow. That is the sad state of children in this country today ! I hope this trade is worth it to you because most assuredly it would not be what your daughter would want.
Reply
Thursday 18 November
By cbkqmom
It is not a sad state for the children...how else can a family provide the assistance for further schooling or family vacations, unless mom works. Kids do not find it sad, they don't know the difference really, unless you teach them to see it as a bad thing. Society tries to make people see it as sad and that is where this negative pressure comes from. Sometimes everyone in the family needs to sacrifice in order for the family to be able to have what they want. I have been an at home mom all my children's lives, and now we are at a point where the kids are about to graduate high school. We have never had a true family getaway vacation, and we simply do not have money to help them in to college. On the one hand, you sacrifice the present for a better future, in the other you sacrifice the easier future for a better present. Neither choice is 100% but you have to do what you feel is the best thing and live with it. In the end, it is YOUR choice, and you should not have to deal with outsiders butting in saying it is the wrong one.
P.S. ..I currently live in the Netherlands...and it really is truly a wonderful place to live :)
Thursday 18 November
By LISAQ
I dont' know that any woman "puts their job ahead of their child" Most times it is necessary. However, if you look at kids today and kids from the 50's, there is a huge difference. Most kids now a days, I would be ashamed to call them mine. I'm sure that has a lot to do with parents never being around. We like to complain about todays generation but the problem lies in those that raised the child.