So, we're halfway through 2010. But when it comes to advertising about women's sexual needs, it seems we're still living in an episode of "Mad Men." As reported by The New York Times, Zestra Essential Arousal Oils, a blend of botanical oils and extracts that increase sexual arousal in women, has had a heck of a time getting their ads on TV, radio ... even WebMD.
Meanwhile, ads for Viagra ran during the Super Bowl, and you'd be hard-pressed to find an American who can't recite the alarming side effects of the male-libido-enhancing Cialis or Levitra.
Better yet, Zestra actually works. (Confession: We've tried it.) How it works: by enhancing blood flow to your nether regions so you're more turned on.
But we're not sure America is ready for that. In fact, in our humble opinion, this reluctance to embrace -- or broadcast -- female sexuality is nothing short of our country's dirty little secret.
Don't believe us? Consider the bete noir of the modern-day USA: the fact that your insurance company covers his Viagra, but not your birth control. As one Lemondropper put it, "It kind of makes my head want to explode."Or check out the cover of Cosmo's September issue. Despite the fact that Eve Ensler has spent half of her life in front of an open mic, it seems we still have a hard time talking about our lady parts in anything other than cutesy euphemisms.
Untamed Va-jay-jays? Not even a magazine that prides itself on being "fun, fearless and female" dares call a vagina by its name.
And what's so scary? It's a body part, folks. One you can point to on anatomy charts. But by refusing to talk about it, we take away women's power. And, in the process, we make it easier for media buyers to turn a blind eye to anything that would enhance our pleasure, not his.
Fact: 42 percent of women experience sexual difficulty at some point in their lives. Only 29 percent of women always orgasm with their partners, according to the Kinsey Institute.
Now the only thing not allowed on TV -- where we have Kardashians spread eagle during bikini waxes, Bachelorettes getting it on in hot tubs and, well, HBO -- is something that might help women fare slightly better in bed.
"When we first came across it, it was quite surprising," Zestra's CEO, Rachel Braun-Scherl, told Lemondrop. "Everyone was talking about how much more comfortable folks are talking about sexuality because of Viagra. What it turned out to be was that they were a lot more comfortable talking about male sexuality."
She and her business partner, Mary Jaensch, found themselves, she says, in the rare position of having "money to spend on advertising, but nobody who would take it."
Most networks just plain refused. Some who run Viagra ads during prime time would only let Zestra rear her racy head between 11 p.m. and 4 a.m. One radio station asked them to remove the words "sex" and "arousal." The sex and relationship section of WebMD, which, the Times reports, "regularly posts advertorials on erectile dysfunction," turned them down cold.
The problem, Braun-Scherl believes, is what we'll call the Viagra Divide: If men aren't turned on in bed, they develop a drug and call it a disease. If women need a little help getting ready, we're literally banned from the airwaves.
"Every woman needs help," says Braun-Scherl. "Women on antidepressants have low libido. Women in menopause have low libido. Women who are stressed -- which is pretty much the world -- have low libidos. It's basically universal, and yet, time and time again, we came up against 'We don't cover your category.'"
"Why is female sexual satisfaction a category you don't cover?" they asked.
Why indeed? The ads -- which feature middle-aged women talking about how they wish they felt more aroused -- are less racy than the average episode of "Desperate Housewives." And maybe that's the problem.
Then again, if women had access to more products like these, maybe we wouldn't be so desperate.
What do you think? Should Zestra be banned from TV? Check out one of the commercials, then tell us, below.












Comments:
Add a comment
Thursday 16 September
By Gail Scruggs
Sorry......but I couldn't disagree more with what seems to be the majority of these comments more. I'm sick of the lack of modesty on TV. It seem s that we're losing any sense of class.
Reply
Thursday 16 September
By Freebmama
Really? There are THIS many people who live in the "dark ages" where it's ok to advertise Viagara and Cialis (and have your 5 year old ask "What's an erection?" over dinner) but NOT ok to advertise something that helps Women? Wow. And here I thought we were living in an "enlightened" age. Turns out most people are still morons.
I think that, as the saying goes, "What's good for the Gander is good for the Goose" (Or is that the other way around?). If you advertise one, you should advertise the other.
I do, however, have issues with these types of commercials running during "kid" shows or during Educational Shows at "prime kid viewing hours". After 10pm, fine. But I really don't want to have to explain to my 5 year old what an erection is, why there's a medicine to help men get one, and why they want one to begin with. (My 11 year old knows all about such things-I have spoken openly with him about such things-Since he was younger...but not at 5!).
Reply
Thursday 16 September
By britany
Well, they do advertize Extenze for women, which is intended for arousal, and KY Intense, which is supposed to make a lady-orgasm like crazy awesome. Although I've never tried either. But their are a few ads for ladies. I do see your point though.
Reply
Thursday 16 September
By LW
i work in a pharmacy and most of the womens birth control is covered by insurance, but i have yet to see one mans viagra ccovered by an insurance company.
Reply
Thursday 16 September
By Joe T
A comment on:
"You are a perfect example of what the problem really is. We need to stop thinking of a a natural function like sex as something dirty or nasty. The idea that sex is somehow "sinful" is an ancient notion first promulgated by the Catholic church and later adopted by the puritans and most other Christian sects. It was originally meant as a method to control believers and most especially women. Seems it has been highly effective over the years."
YOU should get your facts straight about what Christianity thru the Bible says. Sex is a Gift from God, one that is supposed to be shared in the marital "bedroom". It is not dirty, only fools believe that, unless it is outside marriage (of a man to a woman).
Reply
Thursday 16 September
By Jim
My fiance's IUD is covered by our insurance, but my Viagra is only partially covered. 6 pills a month and it's $70. Who has sex only 6 times a month?
Reply
Thursday 16 September
By darlalafem
I don't think any form of sex products or kotex should advertise on tv its something
peolpe will buy they don't have to push it ....My daughters told me when they looked at tv with there boyfriends they were embarased when a kotex or any sexual product
was advertised...so I think its wrong...some teenagers are raised to be decent.
Reply
Thursday 16 September
By SkyBlue
darlalafem, you obviously taught your daughters to be embarassed by those ads. That doesn't make them decent. They're just repressed.
Thursday 16 September
By Angiebaby
Zestra Essential Arousal Oils? That sounds nasty. They should have named it ZEAL (Zestra Essential Arousal Lotion)! That's much more tv commercial friendly! But here's the real challenge in advertising products during the Super Bowl: Who is going to run out and buy the products advertised if the viewer doesn't have them on hand? Hmmm. Let's take BEER, for example. The MAN is going to run right out and buy beer, or he's going to send the kids to the store or something. The details are unimportant. What IS important is that somebody from that house is fixing to buy some damn beer. We can also look at Viagra, Cialis and Levitra. The MAN is going to run right out and buy some "stamina" pills from his doctor. Never mind that he is fooled by what he sees up on the tv. That's right, instead of the woman always looking eager and somewhat... thankful... he can get it up again, most of them are going to get the "Can't you just take care of that yourself?" look from the little woman! Now we come to Zestra Essential Arousal Oils! Women are going to watch that commercial and think about their husbands, their sex lives, the amount of pleasure their husband concentrates on bringing to them in the boudoir, and they're just going to think "What good is THAT product going to do ME?" And the MAN is going to run right out to the kitchen to get another beer or make a streamlined trip to the can during those commercials.
All this being said, which commercials are going to get air time during the Super Bowl?
Reply
Thursday 16 September
By L:inda A.
"Why Are Female Sex Enhancers Banned From TV?" Despite the fact we're in the home stretch of the final year of the first decade of the 21st Century, I'm sure it's still mainly men who make most of the advertising decisions for TV. Personally, I would prefer that ALL TV commercials for sexually-related products be eliminated, or, at the very least, be relegated to late-night and wee-small-hours-of-the-morning TV. (I don't appreciate seeing Cialis and Viagra commercials and hearing about "E.D." when I'm having dinner.) I am a 50-something virgin and I have absolutely no problem with that. I have NEVER had ANY interest in sex (I like to say I was born without a libido, which is the truth), and the only time I ever even THINK about sex is when I hear it mentioned, which, in this sex-obsessed country, is FAR too often. As far as I'm concerned, the ONLY reason for sex is procreation. In other words, unless you're trying to have a baby, FUHGEDDABOUDIT!!!
Reply
Thursday 16 September
By Old Enough
There were ads for Tampax and birth control before there were ads for Viagra. And the K-Y jelly ads certainly attract attention! I have no problem with the modesty in the Zestra ad that accompanied the article - I think it is a good ad, but too long; it gets boring, and that's bad advertising. Yes, some 5 year olds will ask questions, but it is wrong to think that children understand what they see, hear and read if we don't speak to them about it. Back in the dark ages when I was a pre-teen I read about "sanitary belts" and "sanitary napkins" in women's magazine ads. I knew what each of the words meant, but I couldn't understand what made napkins and belts "sanitary" and why sanitization would be necessary. It took me finally blurting out that I wanted a belt that was sanitary to get "The Discussion" going in detail. And that's a good thing. Answer the questions age appropriately when children ask. Good advertising dollars are spent to advertise when those most likely to buy are listening, no matter what the product. To air these ads before 8 p.m. or after 6 or 7 a.m. is counter productive, and bad judgement on every one's part.
Reply
Friday 17 September
By shippy
isn't it great that we live in the U.S.A., where we ALL have the right to Our Own opinions!
Its wonderful to read everyone comments, it tells me how my fellow Amercians live day to day. There are many good points in the discussion, teach what you believe you must, just remember one thing, OUR CHILDREN WILL MAKE "THEIR" OWN DECISION's, RIGHT or WRONG! Dont we see it everyday?
Everyone have a great day, we all need one.
Reply
Thursday 16 September
By Jeff
Perhaps it has something to do with the product name. Viagra, Levitra, Cialis...these are all names of pharmaceutical products. Essential Arousal Oils? Sounds like something you buy at an adult bookstore. If the manufacturer would consider removing the Essential Arousal Oils portion and market it like a drug named Zestra, I'd be willing to bet good money that the commercials would be accepted and ran.
Reply
Thursday 16 September
By Dawn
Whoever wrote this article needs to go back to school and study English Grammar. It's "it seems WE'RE still living in an episode of "Mad Men." , not "it seems WERE still living in an episode of "Mad Men." !! Duh. . .
Reply
Thursday 16 September
By GM
These commercials were not turned down because of the topic--they were turned down because of the content! Your entire premise is shot down by the fact that they show KY commercials all the time, and specifically commercials about the product that enhances female orgasm. Those commercials are clever and memorable without talking about sex, arousal or orgasm.
Tell Zestra to re-shoot following the KY lead and everyone will take their money.
I love how some writers just can't wait to find some nefarious racist/sexist scheme behind a perfectly rational business decision.
Reply
Thursday 16 September
By pete
Whaaa whaaa whaaaa. Everybody be pickin on me 'cuz ...
The world is going to hell in a hand basket and all you're worried about is getting off! What kind of self-centered cry baby are you? You tell me to "man up" but you keep on with your thousand year old whine.
Reply
Thursday 16 September
By oldtimer
Companies advertise to educate people about their product and, of course, to sell it to make money. That's the American way. Viagra and Cialis advertise so much because men that really don't need their product are buying it and using it to enhance their sex lives. Right or wrong it's happening. Men who've had prostate cancer, such as myself, may benefit from it but not always but we try it. If you don't like the commercials, don't watch them. If your five year old asks what an "erection" is tell him he's too young too understand at this time, no big deal. Should this product, Zestra, be allowed to be advertised on TV, of course. Just because a woman can't "get it up" doesn't mean she doesn't have problems sexually that this might help her with. KY gets to advertise "Intense" and it sounds like its similar to this. It works by the way. My wife and I have spent the last couple of years looking for a female sex enhancing pill, lube, etc. She has lost some of her desire and we've wanted to try something of this sort to see if it helps. As for the people that say we should go back to the 60's and the kids shouldn't have to hear such ads, grow up. We're in the 21st century. Catch up to the rest of the world. If the truth be known your kids probably know more about sex than you do. Junior High kids think that oral sex isn't even sex these days. So, if you ask your child if they've had sex yet and they say no, you had better be more specific than that.
Reply
Thursday 16 September
By johnnybeonny
clearly this ad is wayyyyy more graphic than any viagra commercial. common sense; make the ad less graphic and it will go on tv. viagra commercials are discrete and have a lot of innuendo. i never hear comments in the viagra commercials like, "my penis doesnt work very well, and my wife just cant get me hard for very long. im old and my penis is sagging and doesnt perform like it used to
Reply
Thursday 16 September
By Krysten
I think that the viagra commercials should be taken off the air. We ALL know what it is. As for male enhancement etc.... if you really wanted it you could just search the internet, why throw it in everyone's face, people of all ages. I tell ya it is SO annoying to see at least one commercial for viagra or male enhancement every single time I have the tv on
Reply
Thursday 16 September
By Rick
Dear "B",
It clearly said her prescriptions not just her birth control. Of course it was my birth control, also. Equally, they were NOT my prescriptions
Reply