So, we're halfway through 2010. But when it comes to advertising about women's sexual needs, it seems we're still living in an episode of "Mad Men." As reported by The New York Times, Zestra Essential Arousal Oils, a blend of botanical oils and extracts that increase sexual arousal in women, has had a heck of a time getting their ads on TV, radio ... even WebMD.
Meanwhile, ads for Viagra ran during the Super Bowl, and you'd be hard-pressed to find an American who can't recite the alarming side effects of the male-libido-enhancing Cialis or Levitra.
Better yet, Zestra actually works. (Confession: We've tried it.) How it works: by enhancing blood flow to your nether regions so you're more turned on.
But we're not sure America is ready for that. In fact, in our humble opinion, this reluctance to embrace -- or broadcast -- female sexuality is nothing short of our country's dirty little secret.
Don't believe us? Consider the bete noir of the modern-day USA: the fact that your insurance company covers his Viagra, but not your birth control. As one Lemondropper put it, "It kind of makes my head want to explode."Or check out the cover of Cosmo's September issue. Despite the fact that Eve Ensler has spent half of her life in front of an open mic, it seems we still have a hard time talking about our lady parts in anything other than cutesy euphemisms.
Untamed Va-jay-jays? Not even a magazine that prides itself on being "fun, fearless and female" dares call a vagina by its name.
And what's so scary? It's a body part, folks. One you can point to on anatomy charts. But by refusing to talk about it, we take away women's power. And, in the process, we make it easier for media buyers to turn a blind eye to anything that would enhance our pleasure, not his.
Fact: 42 percent of women experience sexual difficulty at some point in their lives. Only 29 percent of women always orgasm with their partners, according to the Kinsey Institute.
Now the only thing not allowed on TV -- where we have Kardashians spread eagle during bikini waxes, Bachelorettes getting it on in hot tubs and, well, HBO -- is something that might help women fare slightly better in bed.
"When we first came across it, it was quite surprising," Zestra's CEO, Rachel Braun-Scherl, told Lemondrop. "Everyone was talking about how much more comfortable folks are talking about sexuality because of Viagra. What it turned out to be was that they were a lot more comfortable talking about male sexuality."
She and her business partner, Mary Jaensch, found themselves, she says, in the rare position of having "money to spend on advertising, but nobody who would take it."
Most networks just plain refused. Some who run Viagra ads during prime time would only let Zestra rear her racy head between 11 p.m. and 4 a.m. One radio station asked them to remove the words "sex" and "arousal." The sex and relationship section of WebMD, which, the Times reports, "regularly posts advertorials on erectile dysfunction," turned them down cold.
The problem, Braun-Scherl believes, is what we'll call the Viagra Divide: If men aren't turned on in bed, they develop a drug and call it a disease. If women need a little help getting ready, we're literally banned from the airwaves.
"Every woman needs help," says Braun-Scherl. "Women on antidepressants have low libido. Women in menopause have low libido. Women who are stressed -- which is pretty much the world -- have low libidos. It's basically universal, and yet, time and time again, we came up against 'We don't cover your category.'"
"Why is female sexual satisfaction a category you don't cover?" they asked.
Why indeed? The ads -- which feature middle-aged women talking about how they wish they felt more aroused -- are less racy than the average episode of "Desperate Housewives." And maybe that's the problem.
Then again, if women had access to more products like these, maybe we wouldn't be so desperate.
What do you think? Should Zestra be banned from TV? Check out one of the commercials, then tell us, below.












Comments:
Add a comment
Thursday 16 September
By Rick
Our insurance always covered my wife's birth control prescriptions. I think it covered my Viagra only one year and that was only because it was on the Medicare Part D formulary that year.
Reply
Thursday 16 September
By SailorKnightWing
Wish they'd cover mine. $90 out the window every 3 months.
Thursday 16 September
By B
Your wifes birth control??? It doesn't benefit you, too?
Just because she is the one who pops the pill, doesn't mean the pill is just for her.
Thursday 16 September
By TJM
Know what? If women had a little help becoming aroused in bed maybe men wouldn't need the Viagra!! Maybe someone from the insurance companies needs to think of it from that perspective.
Reply
Friday 17 September
By awesome52
That is surely the truth. Women out number men. But the world is still ruled by men. What a shame. More women wanting sex,then we would be a threat to what men think they control.
Thursday 16 September
By kpingzing
All of these commercials should be banned from TV. Kids have enough problems in this country without having this smut thrown at them. The golf channel during telecasts advertises viagra. It is really a sin.
Reply
Thursday 16 September
By Lana
I agree
Thursday 16 September
By Crys0917
Um, sex is not only natural, but necessary. If it wasn't for sex there wouldn't be any kids. When it comes to sex, kids should be well informed, not kept in the dark. Being kept in the dark is why they start having to figure things out for themselves, which can be very damaging and destructive to not only their physical selves, but also their pyschological selves. The way (and when) most parents handle the 'sex talk' is the main reason STDs are running rampid and young women are loosing their self-respect.
Thursday 16 September
By sweetpea
This is not smut parents should talk to their kids if they have questions you would be surprised my son in 5th grade they talked about viagra but its up to us as parents to make sure they understand things,i'm a 44 yr old female and i used to have a strong sex drive but for the last few yrs. this ad gave me some hope i really don't want to tell my partner i don't get aroused much anymore, so thank-you
Thursday 16 September
By etherweem
You are a perfect example of what the problem really is. We need to stop thinking of a a natural function like sex as something dirty or nasty. The idea that sex is somehow "sinful" is an ancient notion first promulgated by the Catholic church and later adopted by the puritans and most other Christian sects. It was originally meant as a method to control believers and most especially women. Seems it has been highly effective over the years.
Thursday 16 September
By son
I agree.. I don't think people realize that these drugs are making them whores :)
Thursday 16 September
By k
I wasn't aware that wanting to be passionate with the one you love is a sin!
Thursday 16 September
By whosoeverwill
Thank you for stating what's in my heart...pills popped for everything...does not make healthy...pushing drugs...these companies...they should be banned...if enough parents will get together and sue them...they'd stop then...how awful to suggest a pill of any sort...if people would pray more and seek God...they will be revitalized...this is from my heart to all of you...for married people only that have a right to sex...having problems...God can and will solved them...be careful for what you ask...he knows when you are real and just selfish...God has the answer to all problems...we need to consult with God more...problem solver...Try God
Thursday 16 September
By bstill
At least it should be both sexes enhancers be allowed or neither!
Thursday 16 September
By Valerie
First of all sex is not smut. It's a normal, necessary, wonderful, amazing part of human existence. If you think it's smut? I am sorry for you. Second, my daughter is 15 and laughs at those commercials. She isn't confused by it, nor disturbed by it. She, as most teenagers, think that adults are weird anyway, and she thinks the fact that adult men need help in that department is way too funny. That's her teenage thinking. Those much younger than her don't get what they are talking about in the commercials anyway; if it isn't in their reality, they don't care. You might want to consider why you think those commercials are smut and not information for some men who because of medications they may be taking or other reasons still want to have sex with their wives and have a hard (no pun intended) time doing so. I think the problem is that it's difficult for some people to realize how sex is a drive in all of us like eating when we are hungry...it's so normal and natural and it's how our human existence continues...and because of their own problems with it they want to turn it into something perverted and dirty and take the joy and wonder and intimacy we all need out of it.
Thursday 16 September
By Nader
Sex between two people in a commited relationship is not a sin. Not talking to children about sex is, if you believe in sin. Not talking about birth control and STD's with children is just flat out stone aged thinking.
Thursday 16 September
By Steve
Who you trying to kid "kpingzing"?? My money says you got NO ZING in your PING!!!
Thursday 16 September
By Urabus
Re Zestra v. Viagra commercials: You used the word "sin". If the right to enjoy sex is a sin, at least one of your parents is or will be burning in hell. BTW, I don't think they have Viagra commecials on the Disney channel, and do your sweet, young, innocent children actually watch golf on TV?
Saturday 18 September
By Sammy
Um. This is hardly smut! Do you see beautiful babes in their 20s in skimpy bikinis making sexually suggestive moves advertising this stuff? No. Watch the ad: it's all just real women.
Sexual dysfunction, especially (but not always!) when we get older is a real problem that people deal with. It can really help people feel less depressed and closer to their partners if they can enjoy it more. So many people are embarrassed to talk about their problems, though, when they could be getting help.
Thursday 16 September
By ro
you should GO BACK to the 60's - they were decent people then. None of this garbage on television
Reply