According to a recent study, if you're a single woman between the ages of 22 and 30, and live in a larger city, chances are you're earning more than your male counterparts. About 8 percent more, specifically.While it may not seem like that big of a deal, that 8 percent sliver really is -- mainly because the median salary for a woman with a bachelor's degree was 33 percent lower than the salary of a man with the same degree nationally. So, what's with the urban/rural divide?
The current metropolitan shift is being driven by growth in the percentages of women compared to men who attend college and move on to high-earning jobs, The Wall Street Journal reports. Between 2006 and 2008, 32.7 percent of women between 25 and 34 had a bachelor's degree or higher, compared with 25.8 percent of men. Meanwhile, men have been disproportionately hit by heavy job losses in blue-collar industries in these urban areas.
But don't declare victory yet, ladies. As of the close of summer 2010, we still have quite a bit of work to get every woman's pay equal to men's. After the jump, why we're still lagging and the two things we all need to do next.
The unfortunate facts: Women still only earn 80 cents on the dollar compared to men, and more of it than ever goes to help support our households. A wife's income now comprises 36 percent of a family's total income, as opposed to 29 percent in 1983. Additionally, women's wages tend to stagnate after they give birth.
On a positive note, according to the 2010 Women and Work Survey, a third of women earn more than their partners, and 19 percent make the same.
We can't tease out all of the reasons for the above, but there are two places where we can all make up at least some of the difference in our next job negotiations. Here's how:
Sell Yourself
NYU's Internet expert Clay Shirky says, "Part of this sorting out of careers is sexism, but part of it is that men are just better at being arrogant and less concerned about people thinking we're stupid (often correctly, it should be noted) for trying things we're not qualified for."
And we know plenty of women who've talked themselves out of applying for a job -- out of that very fear that they're not qualified -- before they've even gone on an interview. What's up with that?
"There is no upper limit to the risks men are willing to take in order to succeed, and if there is an upper limit for women, they will succeed less," explains Shirky. Message: Quit telling your friends how "perfect" you are for a position, and sell yourself to the person conducting the interview. Seriously. We don't care if you borrow the ego for the afternoon.
There are plenty of people who will be willing to tell you can't do a job. You don't need to do it to yourself.
Reject the First Offer
"In my experience, the biggest difference between making an offer to a man and a woman is the negotiations," explains Julie Freeman, human resources director for Hybrid Mom, who has spent the last 12 years identifying talent for various companies. "A man will almost always ask for more money or a title increase, whereas a woman is more likely to simply inquire about benefits."
That floored us. Here we are dickering over our health insurance, while men have no qualms about asking for the next title up. And the salary that goes with it.
Got that, girls? If a company does decide you're the right woman for the job, by all means ask for more money. Ask for the title you want. Negotiate a bonus. The worst that will happen? They'll say no. And that you can "take like a man."













Comments:
Add a comment
Wednesday 08 September
By David
As a person who hires I will take a guy over a woman. If you hire a woman you have to worry about sick time(FAR more for a woman) and pregnancy. The government makes you keep there position open to them so you have to train a person to take there place for 3 to 6 months and then FIRE that person to give the woman her job back. Then you have to retrain them and put up with all the off time because of the child. It's not fair to a business or the other person.
Reply
Wednesday 08 September
By Karrie
Why don't you all be Thankful what you get rather making this a battle of the sexes ? Its no ones buisness what a person makes. Why can't you save the money you make and stop wasting money on crap you all don't need? I believe the pay should be about what type of work you do and career you pick.
Reply
Wednesday 08 September
By Alex
oh please shut up already with this ..where is Gloria Steinem when you need her?..where is the NOW movement that perpetuated the fraud that being a mother and homemaker was a substandard role for a woman in a family structure.....Its apparent that the woman's movement was a self motivated fraud perpetuauted by disenfranchised lesbians who felt no role in the nucelar family structure.Unfortunately our children where the victims of such a lie as we fight to keep kids in schools, not pregnant, and off drugs... The reason why woman dont make as much money as men is that a company will not invest in a woman who can get up at leave at a whim to raise a family and never come back so why would they? I wouldnt..the man on the other hand works from the day he graduates to the day he retires..that why he is paid more....so stop all your moaning and groaning and please leave the woman who actually enjoy being a mom and home maker alone....you "progressive" US woman are a laughing stock to woman across the globe....go home and raise a good family....sheesh
Reply
Friday 10 September
By Joe
Forget the salary stuff. Hopefully men and women will be paid according to the quality of their work, attendence and potential growth in the company. As you say, WHAT NEEDS TO BE DONE? Women must be restricted to jobs they can perform, i.e. a 5' woman, as a policeperson, cannot be expected to physically put a man on the ground and handcuff him. If not armed, the man canot be killed just because he tells the policewoman to screw off and goes home. The same woman can't even start to perform the duties of a Fireman or soldier, yet, we see more and more women entering these fields based purely on their minority???status.
Reply
Wednesday 08 September
By tom
The "Women earn 80 cents per every dollar a man earns" gripe is based on averaging all women's income compared to all men's. They are working different jobs, and comparing all the legal secretaries salaries to that of the lawyers is absurd. It's done to create a controversy where there should be none. When the same jobs and seniority are compared between the sexes, big surprise! The pay is the same! And if is isn't, then lawyers swoop in to sue (like they are doing at Walmart). So let's stop claiming victim status all the time. Women get paid the same thing as men for the same job (as dictated by law), except they also get maturity leave and don't have to sign up for the draft.
Reply
Wednesday 08 September
By David
So, Im all about fair pay for both sexes in this day and age, but this seems like a crusade to make more than men. At least the way the article is written. Now that women make more than men in cities, will there be a push for fair salaries by men (in cities) while the push for women in rural areas continues?
Im just noticing how there are unfair advantages in the court system, corp america, even with traditional dating "chivalry" which was the honorable thing to do since the women stayed at home and raised a household...today they dont do that and still expect it. Really?... I want a million dollars and instant fame...give it to me!
Reply
Wednesday 08 September
By coupe31
Any pay discrepancy between men and women MUST take into account the profession they work in. All jobs, whether blue or white collar, still must submit to the laws of supply and demand, union membership, motherhood, and all necessary job skills that employees bring to the table. Certainly discrimination plays a role, but I believe that it's role is becoming increasingly smaller as time goes on. Because women do choose different careers than men, there will most likely be pay differences when all women are compare to all men. Besides this idea for equal pay regardless of chosen career is a red herring, a fallacy to accept and socialist in nature. Socialism as a practicing ideology has been quite discredited; just ask the Russians and Chinese.
Reply
Wednesday 08 September
By Judy
To bring up something else the disparity causes, I'm 70 years old, and when I (a woman) started working, I was only making 50% of what men made for the same work. I think the rationale at the time was "The men have families to support." I'm here to tell you it bites you on the other end of your career also. Average Social Security check? Obviously I don't get that. I worked all right, but for lower wages, so I'm screwed again. Thanks a lot fellas.
Reply
Wednesday 08 September
By Johnnyboy
Judy, YOU took that job. Whether you HAD to take it or not, that's a diffierent question. You women could have just gotte up and left--to have the rest holding the bag. And maybe the businesses would have seen the "light". Instead the fight was taken on a little step at a time. But ultimately, once women were accepted in the workplace, you took that salary/pay. You could have negotiated for more.
Wednesday 08 September
By Jim
Pay disparity between the genders is no longer an issue, as far as I'm concerned. I know of many, many women who make way more than their husbands/boyfriends, and let me tell you, it's really tough on a guy when society tells him all of his life that he has to be the chief breadwinner but yet he cannot find a decent-paying job because he's told, "Sorry, we have to hire more women". Also, I know several of these high-earning women who just love to throw it up in the guy's face that THEY are the big paycheck providers, so they'd better toe the line or else. This has just gotten to be ridiculous. It used to be that one wage earner in the household was enough, but since all of these women decided that they wanted to be viewed in the same light as men, it now requires two incomes just to make ends meet, while the kids raise themselves. And then we can't figure out why so many kids turn out as "bad seeds". Sad.
Reply
Wednesday 08 September
By Genie
It's taken me 43 years to finally earn what a man would earn in my position. I am retiring within a year. We women still have a long way to go.
Reply
Thursday 09 September
By doc
hmmm, more than just a little sexism in the article, when men earn more than women ,its discrimmination, but when women earn more than men its a victory?
looks like more than a few of you girls aren't looking for equality, you want to be superior. articles like this support my theory that the hormones put in our foods cause brain damage in young females like katya
Reply
Friday 10 September
By M
This article title is SOOO misleading. Women don't outearn men. A small group of women --22 to 30 year olds living in the city-- outearn men. I am willing to bet that after 30, this flips. It may be that men in their 20s living in the city take longer to find their career path, and after that they probably make more than women.
Men still outearn women overall, even for the same job. Let's not get caught up in the article title and lose sight of the truth.
Reply
Friday 10 September
By sbw
As a male employee working at a large corporation, I observed what it took to be one of the executives earning the huge salaries that the female half of society complains about as unfairly gender-balanced. I am not an "executive" by choice, and so I am giving up the big salaried job, but I believe women who complain about lower salaried jobs are ignoring what it takes to be in those higher paid jobs.
I think women will earn the same as men when there are as many stay-at-home house-husbands supported by their spouse as there are stay-at-home house-wives supported by their spouse, and when female employees take as little time off from work as male employees take from work, and when as many women place the needs of the business higher than needs of their family as there are men who place needs of the business higher than needs of their family.
There is a glass ceiling above which there are high paid executives, predominately male, but if you look closely, these are also same people who place the needs of the business higher than the needs of their family. They can afford to do that only if they have no family or if they are willing to support a stay-at-home spouse to take care of everything at home.
How many women are willing to support a stay-at-home spouse? How many women are willing to place needs of the business above needs of their family?
This is the main reason for higher number of males at executive positions, and hence the differences in salary when you lump everyone together by gender.
Reply