I guess you could say that I'm pretty domestic for a 27-year-old. I've been with my boyfriend for over four years. We have a house and a beloved dog. But there's one snag in my otherwise responsible adult life that seems to throw some people for a loop: I don't think I want kids. My best friend feels the same way, and whenever we've confessed this to other girls, many have responded with wide eyes and dropped jaws.
Recently, my friend forwarded around an article that ran in the Daily Mail. The writer of the piece, Carol Sarler, has a bone to pick with women who are "healthy and sane" but choose not to have children. She writes that the days of bosses and colleagues shunning working mothers are long gone. Now, apparently, it's the childless women who are not to be trusted, because they're "cold, calculating, sad and mad." In fact, she believes that we childless women actually lack "an essential humanity."
As you can imagine, the article instantly sparked a lot of discussion among my friends. Basically, moms and non-moms alike agreed that Sarler's conclusions were off-base and offensive either way. While the article villainizes non-moms, we all agreed it would be equally preposterous to say that moms make worse employees, because they miss more work for their kids' colds or school plays. But basically we all wondered, What does motherhood have to do with the judgment of an employee's worth?I'd like to think that whether I marry and/or have kids has no bearing on how my employer or fellow employees view me. It shouldn't matter that I happen not to be so sure about having kids. It's just never been clear to me. I think part of it might be my lack of exposure to little kids (never babysat, no little cousins around). Beyond that, I've just never been able to picture myself as a mother. And I don't think it's because I'm a cold, unfeeling woman, as Sarler insinuates.
I'm actually quite the opposite. At work, I like getting to know my co-workers and helping them when I'm able to. I'm head over heels for my baby niece. There's nothing like watching her laugh. I spoil my dog rotten. I've volunteered my time at the Humane Society and as a math tutor. I donate money to charities I'm passionate about. I don't think I'm weird. I'm not a robot or devoid of compassion and care, either.
I'm also insulted by Sarler's assertion that non-moms are the ones who turn up to work late and hung over. That is certainly not the case for this non-mom. My boyfriend and I joke that we haven't been to a bar in ages. The demands of work (I'm an aerospace engineer), flying (obviously can't be sleep-deprived), and training for marathons in my free time are other reasons that the party-going life ended shortly after college for me.

Faded memories of beer pong aside, I've always thought that the goal should be to avoid having your lifestyle throw off your work performance. A quality employee will get her work done in an above-and-beyond fashion regardless of her home life, right? For instance, it's important to me to bring dedication to my work, whether I'm earning the paycheck to support feeding a few extra mouths at home or just myself. And while Sarler insists that mothers are the ones who bring more to the table, thanks to their "mom skills" (like time- and budget-managing, critical thinking, etc.), I think it's fair to say that non-moms are just as capable of meeting deadlines and thinking on their feet.
In fact, when asked what she values most about me as an employee, my boss recently described me as "detail-oriented, possessing an aptitude to learn quickly, having a positive attitude, approachable, organized and enthusiastic." Goes to show you don't need in-depth knowledge of Little Einstein and Diaper Genies to establish a glowing reputation on the job.
Most of my friends who have kids place their bets on me changing my mind at some point in the future. And I do recognize that what we want in life changes as we get older. So, I allow myself the possibility that one day a feeling inside of me will change. But no matter what path my life takes, I know I will always strive to achieve that whole work-life balance saying.
Oh, and by the way, you know another saying that I've always liked? "To each her own."
This story was written by Maressa Brown, as told to her by Dawn Cole.













Comments:
Add a comment
Tuesday 31 August
By srivas
although i have 2 sons of my own,for women who choose not to have children ,all have their own reasons. If i new 25 years ago that the world was going to be the way it is now, i would have also chosen not to have children, not to say that the whole world is bad,but there is more crime going on now then there was over 25 years ago. Not just crime, but its also tough for some to find work and keep a job. And what about social security? Will it still be there when my grandchildren or great grandchildren reach that age? No one knows.
But in this day and time young couples who are considering having children might want to think about what the future holds for the children. please dont missunderstand i do love my children, but its a lot harder now,then it was back then.
Reply
Thursday 09 September
By tlynne774
I agree with you about the world being so messed up and it's only going to get worse. I am constantly having to keep my girls on a short leash because of all the crazy crap in the world. They aren't aloud to do half the stuff I was able to do because you just can't trust people and too much crime. I don't know that I would have not had children but I think it's definately something to think about if you are planning on having kids. It frightens me to think of what my grandkids will be dealing with when they have kids.
Wednesday 01 September
By LaurenJ
I read this article last year when it came out in the UK. The Daily Mail is full of ridiculous statements on their 'Femail' section.
The journalist in question is prone to generalizations and stereotyping.
I've been waiting for a blogger to respond to such an article for quite some time, so thanks very much!
Each to their own!
Reply
Thursday 09 September
By Walter
First of all, generalizations and even "stereotyping" aren't nearly as bad as the politically correct crowd has made them out to be. I believe it was Hegel who said, "To generalize means to think"; meaning that if you don't generalize, and you constantly negate the rule for the exception, you can't think about anything because there's always an exception... but that doesn't mean the rule isn't the rule.
And secondly, a woman, or a man for that matter, who doesn't want kids is defying nature in the sense that humans are made to reproduce, as are all living organisms. If we weren't programmed like that, our species would've gone extinct eons ago. So for whatever the reason is, to reject this biological imperative is not in any way the natural course. You are in fact bucking the trend.
The general assumption (and yes I'm generalizing... i.e. "thinking") is that a woman who doesn't want kids lacks a maternal instinct. Since everyone has a mother, women who lack motherliness are, more often than not, frowned upon. Some may even describe them as "cold and calculating".
What I'm sick of is every time someone is an exception to the rule, they feel compelled to call out the rule as if it is complete BS. There are always exceptions, and you and/or the author of this blog may very well be incredibly nice, caring women who do in fact possess a warm and nurturing maternal instinct, but that doesn't mean a rule isn't a rule. I'm pretty sure everyone by now understands that when a generalization is made it doesn't apply to every single person in the entire world. I'd just say, if you don't fit the profile, don't worry about it because you're not who and/or what the rule is referring to.
Thursday 09 September
By Chucky
She thinks its garbage because she has only scratched the surface in the 'work field' at the ripe old age of 27 Her Bio clock is tick, tick, ticking away...I hope her dog will be of some comfort, when her diapers need changing.
Friday 10 September
By Lisa
The generalization itself is BS. I know plenty of women, whether they be married or single mother or married and single non-mothers, who flirt with their male co-workers. To imply that there is a relationship between being a mother and the quality of an employee is so bogus. By the way, what research was Carol referring to? And also, why were the men not even mentioned?
Really, the main thing that upsets me about Carol's article is that she is touting her (horrible and offensive) opinions as facts.
Wednesday 01 September
By Amanda
I'm going to reveal an opinion I usually keep to myself because it tends to rile people - women, specifically mothers: I do think mothers tend to be less reliable employees.
Despite all the feminist progress we've made, I think women still tend to be the caregivers for children. (I know there are countless examples of men being primary caregivers and mothers who are model employees, but I'm speaking generally and not derogatorily at all.) As a single woman, only emergencies found me late for work or coming in tired or leaving unexpectedly in the middle of the day, but as a mother it happens more often than I'd like. It's not that I don't care about my work, but there are demands for my energy and time and only so much of me to go around. When it comes right down to a choice, my children's welfare comes first.
Upon examining my own lifestyle and those around me, it seems that more often than not, the mother is the one who is in the position to choose between being an above-and-beyond employee and an attentive parent. My husband rarely has to choose because I have already done it. I think many other couples are in the same boat.
While I don't believe in discrimination, I can understand an employer's concern about a woman's, particularly a mother's, dedication and reliability compared to a man's. If, as a business, I could not afford to have certain key personnel leave unexpectedly to tend to a sick child or take several months off to have a baby, I would feel more secure hiring a man or a woman who was not interested in having children. Again, not that a mother can't be an exemplary employee, just that children cause complications in the employer/employee relationship.
Reply
Thursday 09 September
By jennifer
As a person who had the duties of scheduling and supervising 4000 work hours per week I cringed when I was sent a new hire from our HR dept who was a mother (single moms were the worst). This was especially true of mothers of children under school, seconded by ones whose children were in elementary school. These women expected and demanded special treatment, special hours and would call out at the last minute for all the usual (can't get a babysitter or Little Johnny has a runny nose) But when they were being interviewed it was... I have reliable child care and any shift will be ok. HA!
Thursday 09 September
By Cath
And that my dear, is the reason childless women cannot be trusted. You just proved the article's point!
As a working mom, I've had to deal with childless women in the workplace that think they know everything. They are back stabbers and greedy. Not uplifting to their fellow females at all.
Thursday 09 September
By Steph
i totally agree with you. most jobs i have held the ones calling out the most that i have had to work for were mothers because their child had a cold or the father couldnt be bothered to take the time to get out early to get the child because of a school closing or something. its not that moms are unreliable but i do agree with you they are still the major caregiver... i know i was lucky and my mom was able to stay home but thats not the case now a days and thats truely sad....
Thursday 09 September
By worknmom
"Upon examining my own lifestyle and those around me, it seems that more often than not, the mother is the one who is in the position to choose between being an above-and-beyond employee and an attentive parent. My husband rarely has to choose because I have already done it. I think many other couples are in the same boat."
I think many other couples have made the same choices, but that has nothing to with the ability to make the choice but rather with the willingness to make it. At this juncture, I think it is still very common for fathers to be less willing to sacrifice career advancement for parenting.
Friday 10 September
By fusufusu
I am also a Mother. I am an older mother my son is 21. I totally agree with everything you said. You can spin it anyway you want but being a mom does interfere with everything else in your life. Even your marriage. Get real that's just the reality
Friday 10 September
By ovatia
We have not come as far as we need to if we are letting FATHERS get away with not pulling their weight when it comes to responding to family needs. Your willingness to "just do it" when it comes to responding to your family's needs supports this stereotype (which is probably not factually supportable). So I suggest you and all other mother out there, if they are in a position to do so, expect MORE from their child rearing partners. In fact DEMAND that they be responsible fathers and share in the duty.
Wednesday 01 September
By Detached
I have kids and have missed ZERO work days in 10 years because of them and am a better employee than most people, whether childless or not. Some people are great workers, and some people are not. Having kids or not having kids isn't a good gauge to use for evaluating whether someone will be a good employee.
In my case, motherhood made me a MUCH more dependable worker. It taught me how to multi task and to stay focused even when things are going crazy around me. It taught me to prioritize exceptionally well at an instant, and I learned how to be patient with clients and co workers in a way that was impossible for me before I had my kids. Not to mention the huge improvements in my maturity level.
Reply
Thursday 09 September
By Lilysmom
I agree with the person commenting that motherhood has made her into a more valuable employee. I have become the employee I have always wanted to be, since having children.
I wouldn't generalize that all non-mother's are cold and calculating, but I have had bad experiences with them on the job. I have encountered several who were terribly cold and calculating(non-mothers). Some, I am thinking of one particular non-mother co-worker, seem to take their job and themselves too seriously.
Just sayin' ......
Thursday 09 September
By Carrie-Lee
I completely agree. I have 3 kids and my co-worker has 4. We're both in our 30's. She is constantly needing to take time off because of her children and one of them is even old enough to babysit the others. Her kids call her at work due to problems or issue they're having non-stop. She's also habitually late and fairly lazy. No one disturbs me while I'm on the job unless it is an ABSOLUTE emergency. I'm the major breadwinner, and I take my job seriously.
I think making even a general statement about who makes the better employee is unrealistic. Its nothing to do with what comes out of your womb but what goes on in your head.
Saturday 11 September
By good mom
JENNIFER...your comment struck a nerve. I am a single mom with 2 girls. One in elementary school and one in middle school. I certainly don't, nor ever have, missed work because of my childs runny nose. If anything, I know I need that money and avoid missing work at all costs. I've been at my job for almost 4 years and called in ONE day because one of my girls was extremely ill. Hell, I didn't even ask for a vacation until having been there 3 1/2 years. Any kind of appointments or activities for my kids or myself I make in the evening or on the weekend if possible (which is usually acommodated). For you to say "single moms are the worst" is a low blow to all of us very hard working single women in the world who are just trying to make it and do the right thing by our children.
Thursday 09 September
By Lisa
AMEN!
Thursday 02 September
By Jean
I am absolutely stunned that I still get that drop-jawed look from other women when I say I don't want to have kids. They look sad, like my life won't have any worth without children--and that makes me feel sad for them if they really believe that our worth, as women, is based upon our ability to reproduce. Cheers to you, Dawn, for realizing that a healthy relationship, a solid career and plenty of giving and sharing in your life makes you a rock star. Motherhood specifically has nothing to do with being better employees - although that might be the place where some women learn those skills. I'm sure my ability to function successfully in my career can come from other areas of my existance. And, yes, of course you might change your mind. I might, too. We are human and are constantly evolving. Thats just how it works.
Reply
Thursday 09 September
By ervfranke
Spare us the retrospective angst. This argument of yours was current in the sixties, usually by girls whose hormones were enraged by boy friends deciding about Vietnam. Oh the terrible world, oh the horrors, I simply don't want the trouble of taking care of anyone. Good Argument. I won't let another person suffer in the world the way I have suffered. Oh Woe is me.