A nail polish that doesn't chip is basically the Holy Grail of mani-pedis -- and the $6 billion nail salon industry claims to have found it in a gel. Over the last couple of years, the gel manicure has grown in popularity: Two-thirds of salons now offer the service, which is supposed to provide the long wear of an acrylic without the accompanying nail damage.
Still, mixed in with all the hype are complaints that gel nails do still chip, the polish can only be taken off by visiting a salon and drowning one's fingers in acetone, and horror of horrors, the color selection is lacking. Worse yet, they may cause serious nerve damage and infections. If something seems too good to be true, it probably is (a gel manicure).
The Cost of Resilient Nails
"This is likely a rare occurrence," says Avitzur, "Still, I doubt the number of these cases is being tracked."
According to Avitzur, there are several points in the gel process that could be associated with health risks. Improper use or overuse of a nail file to prepare the nail for layers of gel can expose sensitive skin to chemicals or infection. Also, some salons may be mixing acrylic products with gel products or purchasing cheap gel products from manufacturers with little quality control. One particularly dangerous ingredient, a chemical called methyl methacrylate, can cause shortness of breath and irritate the eyes and skin.
The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has banned methyl methacrylate but they state on their website that "many nail products that contain potentially harmful ingredients are allowed on the market because they are safe when used as directed." The problem is that unlike prescription drugs and treatments, cosmetics and nail products do not have to undergo clinical trials before being sold on the market. Furthermore, nail salons are not required to list ingredients on labels unless the product is available for purchase. Salon-goers should be concerned if nail technicians can't answer questions about gel ingredients and if the liquids smell funny.
"This patient probably didn't have a true gel manicure," says Avitzur, "but I plan on avoiding them myself and would not recommend them to others at this point."
A Miniature Tanning Bed for Hands

"Most cancers on the hands are found in people with extensive sun exposure," says Zoe Draelos, a dermatologist in High Point, North Carolina, "It's the cumulative lifetime exposure to UV light that is the risk."
A case study by Austin-based University of Texas researchers in the "Archives of Dermatology" in April 2009 reported that two women developed non-melanoma skin cancer - cancer that occurs in the outer layer of the skin - on the tops of their hands from exposure to nail lamps. Both women were middle-aged, otherwise healthy, and had no cancer history. This does not prove that UV nail lamps definitely cause skin cancer; larger clinical studies will be necessary to determine a link.
Still, Draelos recommends using UV nail lamps in as limited a fashion as possible.
To Gel or Not to Gel
For those who have their hearts set on a gel manicure, but would rather avoid the potential risks of nerve pain, cancer and fungal infections, there may be an alternative. This spring, a company called CND announced the first 'hybrid' gel manicure. Called "Shellac," the hybrid is a marriage between gel and traditional nail polish that may be more nail-friendly.
The treatment is only available at salons, but does not require the same level of skill to apply as a gel. Moreover, the process of removing the polish minimizes exposure to acetone.
Regardless of what type of manicure is desired, Avitzur says, "at the very least women should choose a well-established salon with experienced and licensed techs."
Amber Angelle is a freelance writer in Brooklyn, NY who cares entirely too much about what her nails look like.




















Comments:
Add a comment
Wednesday 21 July
By leslie m
I don't know what caused the woman's pain in her arm but I can tell you I have the same problem she does and have never ever had a Gel Manicure. I have a narrowing in the thumb joint that gets inflammed at times causing the nerve to act up from the knuckle to the wrist causing an electrical sensation in the arm. I think it is easier to blame a manicure so the docs don't have to admit they can't figure it out.
Reply
Wednesday 21 July
By Licensed Nail Tech
When will the media get the CORRECT information to the consumer????
First of all Shellac.....It's still a gel product...and you have to go into the light for it to CURE, not dry! It comes off with acetone just like every other "soakable gel product" The only difference is CND came out with little wraps that have the acetone on them thus taking away the dish of acetone. If the salon or tech doesn't want to invest in these wraps, guess what folks? You are going into the little dish of acetone.
In order to prep a nail for gels, there is no rough filing involved..or at least there shouldn't be. A light buff to remove the shine with a 240 grit or higher file is all that is needed.
If you want to find a reputable salon and a knowledgeable LICENSED tech visit beautytech.info It's a site especially for consumers again that's beautytech (dot)info
Reply
Sunday 08 August
By Amanda
I agree. Some Doctors want to put blame when they have NO research to back up their "story". UV lamps don't cause cancer and they also do not emit UVA rays that cause cancer.
I'd rather use shots glasses to remove soak-off gel and let it evaporate than to put more garbage into a lnadfill. Personally I try and be aware of waste when doing nails. I've been a licensed manicurist for over 16 years and I feel that Shellac,Gelation and Gelish are great soak-off products. These soak-off gels are removed every 3 weeks so that also limits the amount of polish remover you come into contact with. Most people who have regular manicures have polish removed everyweek! Also most brands of soak-off gel do not contain harmful chemicals such as formaldehyde, toluene and Phthalate that is found in CHEAP polish. Consumers need to wake up and visit REAL salons that use quality products instead of visiting dime store nail shops for a quick fix. You get what you pay for.
Wednesday 21 July
By Chris
The Shellac is the best nail polish I have ever used. It has consistently lasted for 14+ days without a chip or any wear. Very limited colors. My nail tech also has had a problem reordering it due to high demand. Usually after about 14 days it still has a tendency to peel off in one sheet so have never had a problem with having to soak it off. It is still way better than the one day that I used to get out of a manicure.
Reply
Thursday 22 July
By Kentucky nail tech
It's appalling that this scare over gel manicures began because ONE doctor in NY had ONE patient with unexplainable nerve damage in her hands. So after visiting many doctors, this all-knowing NY doctor solved the mystery by concluding it was from her gel manicure? Well, what if he's mistaken?
When was a scientific experiment with a controlled panel conducted in an independant laboratory to come to this concrete conclusion? Without taking those steps, I don't see how he can prove or disprove his theory. So basically the news media ran with this scare topic concerning salons once again, yet further spreading misinformation.
And 2 women had skin cancer on their hands, so automatically it was from the uv lamps used to cure their gel nails? Never knowing where or what the women had their hands into over the course of their lifetime, how valid is that doctors conclusion?
We, as humans, do not know a fraction of what causes cancer OR how to treat it. Every doctor has their own opinions. Some work, and some don't. You can see that's true by reading the obituaries. There's no definitive answer.
It's just mind boggling that many women will be scared away from having their nails done, but yet they will still tan by the pool, color their hair, use deoderant and anti-persperant, eat processed foods, drink carbonated beverages, smoke, work under flourescent lighting, talk on the cell phone, clean without wearing gloves, and do any number of other random, every day things that could potentially put them at risk for cancer!
Reply
Saturday 24 July
By outre
Sigh.... UV LEDs are not necessarily safer.
UV LEDs still emit UV wavelengths. It just may be that depending on the quality of the LEDs the wavelength might be longer than 'true UVs' (so slightly less damaging) because the true short wavelength UV LEDs are far costlier to produce than near UV wavelengths.
It is more economical in terms of energy use, and doesn't emit heat as much but in no way are UV LEDs as safe as marketing people have made it seem.
Gel manicures are cured by a chemical reaction. It needs to be exposed to the correct wavelength. Regardless of how the wavelength is produced, old school bulb or LEDs it's still wavelength patterns that you are being exposed to.
You know those lights your dentist uses to cure fillings? Notice how they offer you goggles and they wear googles during use? That's UV LED and I'm pretty sure the nail salon LED lamps have higher number of LEDs in the array than those dentist curing things.
Reply
Wednesday 18 August
By daniella
Does anyone know the minimum wattage of UV light that will properly cure the shellac products?
Reply