You know what really sucks for us guys? When we slip up and accidentally imagine being a single woman. Not because being a woman or being single is terrible, mind you. But because occasionally we remember that, as men, we don't have to explain why we're alone with the sheer maddening regularly that you all do. This thought has occurred to me at various points in my life but was made crystalline while at dinner this past weekend with my close friend, S.
S and I are both unmarried, uncoupled and in our 30s. Now, this makes sense for me. I'm slightly unhinged and haven't been on a third date since there were only two "Shrek" movies. There are only a few things I know with utter certainty: Grape Nuts contain neither grapes nor nuts, unicorns are real, and I'm only good at strange, psycho-sexual affairs that end in mutually assured isolation. But my friend S? She's gorgeous, smart, successful and funny.
I found myself wondering, Wait a damn minute, why is she single?
Then it hit me. Why is the sheer fact that she's a beautiful charming woman who's alone worthy of questioning? Why am I not asking why my charming and attractive friends are in relationships (or why my less attractive, less charming friends are)? There's a huge world out there of interesting people who shouldn't have to condemn themselves to a two-person chain gang digging trenches in their conjoining manacles so people don't wonder what's wrong with them.
Of course S wants to meet someone special. Relationships exist because being we want to love and be loved. We want someone to care about us, and we want to care for someone in a way no one else on Earth does. It's all as human as treating airport employees as if they have some providence over your delayed flight: "But the weather's fine -- why is it saying we don't take off until nine?"
Maybe You Haven't Met the Right Guy Because I'm What's Out There
Sure, you do get used to being alone after awhile, and sometimes in a good way. S and I talked about how our protracted singledom made the thought of actually having to date someone seem as strange and confusing as the choices my stupid cell phone's predictive text makes. (I'm trying to say "cool," you idiot phone, not "jazz." Why would I respond to my friend's text about getting a huge promotion with "hey, jazz!"?)
But while in my case, the problem may lie with me, I firmly believe that S just hasn't met anybody who does it for her. She has a great job and she's well adjusted and doesn't "need" someone to complete her. Me? I'm a huge mess, but my friends and family regard my single status as proof of my intelligence, patience and independence. I'm a man, and I don't have elephantiasis or a soul patch, so clearly I'm single by choice.
But S? She can count on being perceived as being too picky, too difficult, too proud. She can count on people asking if she's considered Match.com and if not, why not? And even worse, she can count on the news of her single status being met with the shock that usually attends the visage of the Virgin Mary appearing in a shrimp basket at Long John Silver's. Two things here: There should be no such thing as quick-service seafood, and my friend shouldn't have to take the time to explain herself to disbelieving mouth-breathers who refuse to live in a world where stunning blondes aren't rolling their eyes at their fat husbands.
Picky vs. Unwilling to Settle
Although she gets sad and feels lonely occasionally, and although she wants a family one day, she won't fake-laugh her way through life with a genuinely unfunny man because he's pretty swell otherwise and it's time. Disabusing someone of why a charming and smart woman like herself is still single shouldn't require the time it takes to explain string theory, yet S is constantly required to explain herself. (I would guess this goes for millions of single women out there as well.) This is such bullsh**.
S has remained single due to not settling for the cavalcade of men she's had in her life who weren't right and because she hasn't let the pressure of society, family and friends constantly asking her "Why are you still single?" get to her. She won't choose Mr. Good Enough, no matter what Lori Gottlieb says in her book about settling, because she's acutely aware of the epic chasm between Good Enough and Truly Good.
Speaking of that book, let me get this straight, Ms. Gottlieb: A woman no longer in her 20s should apparently deign to cohabitate with someone she's not really into because a single women in their 30s and beyond who want a relationship based on real love and true friendship and intellectual compatibility are unrealistic?

No offense Lori Gottlieb, but F you. Thank God you're not a playwright and weren't alive in the 16th century and that your existence didn't cancel out Shakespeare's, because I'm pretty sure "Some Guy and Juliet" wouldn't have had the same emotional resonance.
Advantage: Dudes
As a man I'm entitled to a certain idea in my head of the kind of woman I want to be with, and -- poof! -- I'm a romantic. As a woman in her 30s, S has a certain kind of idea in her head of the kind of man she wants, and -- voila! -- she's unreasonable.
In truth: S is the romantic. It's really the thing that turns people like her off from online dating. There is truly nothing wrong with it; it's a medium to meet people and as good a way to do so as any out there, probably better than most. But it's undeniably unromantic and increasingly specialized, involving algorithms and long questionnaires and has all the charm of being set up by that robot Jinx from "Space Camp." Where's the mystery? Where's the unimprovable feeling of something akin to fate having a hand? "If I hadn't stopped to tie my shoe, if I hadn't decided I needed to buy a cantaloupe, if I hadn't contracted acute paralysis of the liver in Ecuador and ended up hospitalized next to so-and-so ..."
Perhaps S needs to "put herself out there" more, as she's often told. Perhaps when push comes to shove she'll have to online date, or pick up some hobby that puts her in contact with different people, or learn how to animate yarn into a handsome prince. I really have no idea. All I know is she's great and she's single and, for the most part, she's happy. We all get lonely. People in couples are not immune. Some would argue there's nothing worse than being lonely in another person's company. Ask anyone who's ever dated someone they didn't really love or spent time on a New York subway.
The next time someone asks S why she's single, I hope she responds, "Because I haven't been lobotomized yet, you miserable bastard."
Even if it's her mom.
[Redacted] Guy is Lemondrop's anonymous single guy writer. He likes Steak-Ums, gardening on his roof deck and corresponding with serial killers. You can send him hate mail and love letters here, and follow him on Twitter.













Comments:
Add a comment
Wednesday 30 June
By Vanessa
HELL YEAH. Sock it to Lori Gottlieb, and every mothereffer that that thinks it's a woman's civic duty to settle for any decent man that will have her. May diseased cows urinate on them.
Reply
Saturday 03 July
By bunny
You are welcome to your shriveled ovaries. I can take the cow urine... been there done that (literally... it is not as bad as you imagine). Women are the sexual gatekeepers, and often (more often than not) are the relationship gatekeepers. If a woman goes through her sexual prime of 16-30 and can not find someone from the tens of thousands of interested men she encounters, then she is picky. Most women are too ignorant to even know that they have a selection of tens of thousands, but it happens to most women. They just cull their choices down without so much as a first thought. dating services, pubs, clubs online dating... all have many rimes more women than men, and most of the men are actually willing to settle pretty low to have anyone. This is why the average woman has been found to inflate her "10 scale" by an average o two points. A five believes she is a seven, and has a chance at a nine. Because she believes she has a chance at a nine, she refuses to settle for a five or a six or a seven. Daddy was lying when he said you were the most beautiful princess in the world... give one of the other 9999 other guys half a chance and you may find that you meet Mr. right. You are the gatekeeper, if no one is going through, you are not letting anyone through.
And the comeback is that I am single and will always been... Mutually happily married for a decade, and had a long line of women before that.
Saturday 10 July
By drew
especially since our world is so over populated, why the drive to BREED!?
If only people were allowed to not have babies and feel good about it, we just might have a better world to live in
Tuesday 13 July
By Vanessa
I apologize for not responding sooner; I haven't checked this email account in a while.
Man, sometimes I wish my ovaries were shriveled; then I remember not to rush my life. Though, I do look forward to a time in the far, far future where ideally I will have established myself in my career after decades of hard work and settled down to a slower pace of life, with wilted ovaries and raisin genitalia. However, that's a different and unfinished story.
“Bunny”, the spirit of this article is not about the narcissistic women that waste away their lives actively searching for men with ridiculous expectations and shallow judgement, as you describe. (Let's not forget that men are by no means an exception to conceit and unrealistic standards.) It is about single women (this applies to men, too) that enjoy life and occasionally feel pangs of loneliness, but overall find satisfaction without a partner. It doesn't mean they don't think it would be nice to have one; every non-sociopath wants to be loved and understood. It is about women that would like a companion, but it is not an all consuming desire and they'd prefer that life grant them the opportunity to meet a significant other. But sometimes even when two compatible people meet circumstances prevent either party from ever knowing the other well enough to see their compatibility. They don't get a chance to develop their potential romantic feelings because they never realize that potential exists. Realistically, no one meets the tens of thousands of people you hyperbolically describe, unless they flip through a massive dating site (filled with as many men as women, as they are) and superficially judge people. While networking makes meeting people easier than ever; it doesn't make it easier to know people. An internet profile or a speed date shows more of how people want to be perceived while they're on their best behavior; they do not show the actions that demonstrate who a person really is. Inner circles comprised of friends that people really know are small, so realistically opportunities for real intimacy forming are limited; which makes it especially hard for busy women/men that are not actively seeking mates to find one. And this is where the point of diversion between men and women comes in; the reason the article exists.
The above paragraph easily applies to men and women alike, the difference lies in society's reaction to singledom in the 30s regarding gender. As the article explains, society finds it acceptable for men to be single and gives them positive justifications for it; while for women they're negatively judged for it. What this article is saying is that no negative assumptions should be made period! (And perhaps no positive ones, either- though as with most things to do with the human psyche the negative is more powerful and influencing than the positive.) Live and let live, etc, is the point. But live and let live is not what's happening. People make assumptions about single women in their 30s, that they're “picky” and “refuse to settle” because they think they're “the most beautiful princess in the world.” Your response is a perfect example of the counterproductive thought process that this article picks apart and destroys. The word choice “refuse to settle” in particularly speaks as though women are resisting something that's required of them; nowhere in the body of women is there a clock that goes off that requires her to “settle” with a man in a house with a white picket fence. You say that “most women are too ignorant to even know that they have a selection of tens of thousands”. In addition to the impossibility of knowing tens of thousands of people (disregarding location, relationship status, age difference, moral beliefs) you make the assumption that most women are easily compatible with that many men and vice versa; which beyond being irrational, is ignorant.
You make the assumption that my “comeback is that” you are “single” and always will be, dead wrong. I don't give a damn what your relationship status is or what your history, having overly simplified thoughts colored only by stereotypes never stopped anyone from marrying. Unfortunately, it only makes it easier for the people that have those thoughts to convince themselves that they're right. The simpler the generalization, the easier to self-justify. This response has not a damn thing to do with you and everything to do with with fruitless attitudes about women that make our society a less enjoyable place for both sexes.
If you excuse me, someone is trying to stick their man parts through the hole in my gate, and I must keep up my duty as “sexual gatekeeper” and quickly decide if I should lead them to the entrance with glow sticks or hack off their genitalia with a rusty saw!
P. S. A woman's sexual prime is age 35.
Wednesday 30 June
By maria
I totally agree!!!! we shouldnt settle just for any guy... we hav the rite to choose the rite guy... And like S. i'm romantic too and i hate online sites to find a guy because there is just no romance and mystery in there.
Reply
Wednesday 30 June
By Jenna
thank you! I'm only 21 and I'm getting the "why are you single" stares. My friend's 20 and at a cousins baby shower got, "Are you getting married soon?"
Reply
Thursday 22 July
By Chas.
20 year olds with babies just want to drag you down into the boring world they're in. Enjoy your life, your 20s are the best time of your life. Don't settle for anything that you don't want.
Wednesday 30 June
By sanrita
"Underneath our clothing, we're covered in scales."
Reply
Wednesday 30 June
By Virginia
sanrita
Love BJ!
Wednesday 30 June
By Lauren
Are you the only guy who thinks this? just curious...
Reply
Wednesday 30 June
By Lonely In New York City
this piece is soooo jazz. lemony droplet will you date me?
Reply
Wednesday 30 June
By David S.
I will agree women likely have to explain being single more often, but to me that pressure comes far more from their female peers than any male out there, with the exception of male family members perhaps. I think men get the "look" more if they are single past a certain age, with everyone wondering if the are gay -- and there is nothing wrong with that if they are. My brother is 36 and never married. Frankly, if he is gay, I think my family would find him far more interesting than we do now. But he dresses badly and is a computer geek -- I'm guessing he's just a hopeless straight nerd. Anyway, if you don't want to be married, stay single. It's 2010, not 1910.
Reply
Wednesday 30 June
By dragon_girl441
Whenever I tell a guy I'm single he always responds with, "Why?!" I don't understand why they bother asking. What do they think I'm going to say? Basically I'm single because nobody that I like has asked me out. Simple as that.
Reply
Wednesday 30 June
By phillysgirl14
"There are only a few things I know with utter certainty: Grape Nuts contain neither grapes nor nuts, unicorns are real, and I'm only good at strange, psycho-sexual affairs that end in mutually assured isolation."
You forgot to add that the Zombies ARE coming and God help anyone that's not prepared. Aside from that you're spot on.
Peace, Love and a Pocketful of Sunshine!!
~~Shasta
Reply
Thursday 01 July
By Feckless Troglodyte
With women outnumbering guys in college, society is gonna have to reconcile with the fact that the average quality of women is going up while the average quality of guys is going down. I predict an increase of women like S over the next decade, which will eventually reduce the stigma associated with being a single woman.
This is, of course, horrible news for fat and lazy guys like myself, who watch too many sit-coms and hope to find a smart and beautiful girl willing to settle.
Reply
Thursday 01 July
By Feckless Troglodyte
With women outnumbering guys in college, society is gonna have to reconcile with the fact that the average quality of women is going up while the average quality of guys is going down. I predict an increase of women like S over the next decade, which will eventually reduce the stigma associated with being a single woman.
This is, of course, horrible news for fat and lazy guys like myself, who watch too many sit-coms and hope to find a smart and beautiful girl willing to settle.
Reply
Tuesday 13 July
By J
I don't know that the quality of man has gone down. I do agree that the women go up though...
As for finding a woman to "settle" for you or anyone like you - what i have found as a woman and as I have gotten older (30) is that I am not looking for Mr. Dashing, Mr. Right or Mr. Gorgeous. I am looking for Mr. I will show how much I love my girlfriend/wife/mother/etc, Mr. Respectful, Mr. Best Friend when you need me...oh, and Mr. I will clean up after myself at least half the time.
Thursday 01 July
By Kaya
Hate to break it to you BUT Romeo was that "Some Guy". The dude was in love with another girl just moments before meeting Juliet. How romantic is that?
Reply
Thursday 01 July
By James
Nobody should ever settle. That's why I hate that song 'Love the One You're With'. Completely idiotic!
Reply
Friday 09 July
By paizlea
James, you know that song isn't about long-term relationships, right?