Growing up, I loved Carrie Bradshaw so much I wanted to be her. I watched so much "Sex and the City" that when I was 18, I turned down an offer from Smith College to attend a college-of-last-resort in New York City and live the dream: Life as a single, upwardly-mobile, city-dwelling woman writer. Of course, within a year, I figured out that most of Carrie Bradshaw's life was fantasy -- writers in Manhattan take the subway almost exclusively, buy their designer clothing at Housing Works, and drink those $15 cosmos sparingly -- but I loved Carrie nonetheless.
Yet I probably won't go see the "Sex and the City 2" movie. Let's face it: "Sex and the City 2" looks terrible.
On the whole, there has been a real mismanagement of the SATC brand. When the show debuted in 1998 on HBO, the opening credits teased New York City skylines themselves; in fact, "Sex and the City"'s reverence for the city could be likened to the way it's lovingly illustrated in Woody Allen movies.

The initial episodes, which opened with men and women discussing their genuine confusion about the opposite gender, channeled Nora Ephron -- discreetly feminist and upscale. The show was an HBO exclusive, meaning you had to find a rich friend to invite you over; if she was a great friend, maybe she'd offer you a cosmo. Mikhail Baryshnikov, the legendary ballet dancer whose likeness is forever preserved in one of Annie Liebovitz's most well-known portraits, made an on-going cameo in season six as Carrie's second-to-last love interest, Aleksandr Petrovsky. And "Sex and the City" had such selling power that it elevated Manolo Blahnik, Sushi Samba -- even Magnolia Cupcakes -- to icon status.
Today, "Sex and the City" is not catapulting other businesses to fame; it's a business in and of itself, and one that's become lowbrow and silly. Any artistry in "Sex and the City" is being squeezed out in the name of churning out another supremely high-grossing movie for women in a supremely down economy. With these films, "Sex and the City" has effectively been lobotomized. And it's not sexy to watch.
Whether it was Charlotte going "Poughkeepsie" in her pink Adidas track suit during a trip to Mexico in the first SATC movie, or the sequel's inclusion of a trip to Abu Dhabi in lieu of a more sophisticated plot. One of the movie posters bears a giant "2" upholstered in silver aluminum mesh; in the trailer, Carrie tells Big that their relationship needs more "sparkle."
But the last thing "Sex and the City 2" needs is more sparkle; it needs its integrity back. In fact, the entire film franchise (a third is already rumored to be in production) is a definitive shift from the highbrow nature of the TV series that professional women loved to watch -- and women's studies professors lived to dissect for what it revealed about women's lib. That was five to 10 years ago. Today's "Sex and the City" makes "Bride Wars" look like quality cinema.If you don't like the SATC rerun that's on TBS, you can watch the one simultaneously airing on the CW. Thus, the "Sex and the City" fan base has shifted, perhaps to a much younger audience. At the opening of the "Sex and the City" movie two summers ago, I was shocked by the behavior of the audience: A cell phone went off once a minute (more than once, someone answered their phone), the text message alerts never stopped, and the audience conversations continued at a dull roar until the credits rolled.
Even New York City itself is feeling the SATC aftershocks: Bleecker Street is littered with cupcake wrappers every day between 11 and 4 -- the remains of legions of teenage fans visiting Magnolia Bakery. Fine -- if "Sex and the City" has adapted to appeal to younger women, or bring in a wider audience, more power to it. But appealing to younger women doesn't require dumbing down until the brand itself is unrecognizable.
That's why I'll be boycotting. Sure, it's normal to want to see how Carrie's closet is stocked this time, what in the world brought Aidan to Abu Dhabi, and whether she'll merely run into -- or recycle -- her ex. But women also need to sustain a certain level of outrage that this quality television show got such a bad makeover on its way to the silver screen that I'm sure the original Carrie wouldn't recognize it.
Liz Funk is a New York–based author, freelance writer and speaker. Her first book, "Supergirls Speak Out: Inside the Secret Crisis of Overachieving Girls" was published last year by Simon and Schuster.












Comments:
Add a comment
Monday 17 May
By Kayla
I agree! I was so disappointed at the first trailer I watched for SATC2 that I am not at all excited to see it. I also miss the TV show so much.
Reply
Monday 17 May
By lvdwillia
I am elated to see Aidan back, so I look forward to seeing the sequel. During the regular series I couldn't watch the show for quite some time after Carrie cheated on Aidan with Mr. Big.
Reply
Tuesday 18 May
By g
Has everyone lost their mind? It;s a film!!! Do you debate the realities of Batman? No! It's a film. If you ever thought it was going to be real...well Americans are dumber than I thought. It's a film.
Reply
Friday 11 June
By amy k.
uh, have you ever seen the geeky forums where people DO debate the realities of Batman, Star Trek, Star Wars, etc? This is a proud Internet tradition!
Tuesday 18 May
By Courtney
I'm not excited about the movie, either, and I...think...I agree with this article...? I don't know, I'm not sure. I don't want to see the movie because I think it's gotten crazy-unrealistic and like one big commercial and just oozing with cheesiness. Is that what this writer thinks? I can't tell, I feel like no point was ever made during this confused, all over the place post. Does she know why she doesn't like SATC anymore?
Reply
Wednesday 19 May
By classymom
Well, I have to admit that I am a fan of the SATC tv show...but as I was chatting to one of my friends, I brought up the following questions: How do 4 successful social butteflies not have any ethnic friends in NYC? Why is it that these four great "friends" almost ignore Miranda being a single mom ? etc etc.. When you really think about it these characters are the most narcissistic women !! And why is it that these women talk about being sexually liberated but you rarely if ever hear them ask a man about his sexual past BEFORE they sleep with him or ever see them demand a condom ?? But, i remind myself that it is for entertainment...plain and simple. :)
Reply
Wednesday 19 May
By Virginia - Only The Good Die Young - But I'm not that good!
It's called Sex and the City... Why are they leaving the f***ing city? I completely agree with you. However, I'm 18 and have been watching the show since it started (Thanks to my sister who is a dozen years older than me~She actually is 12 years older than me!), but I turned off my phone when I saw the first movie. What I really enjoyed about the first movie was that whole thing about Love being the only label that mattered. My mom really appreciated this as well and called the movie 'sweet'. I didn't think she'd like it since she hates designer things, but she actually enjoyed this designer movie!
Reply
Friday 11 June
By Amy K.
hear hear, liz funk!
Reply