Currently on the sixth floor of the Museum of Modern Art in New York City, the museum is presenting "The Artist Is Present," a retrospective of work by the Yugoslavian performance artist Marina Abramovic. There is a busy room providing pictures and videos that make up a cacophonous visual biography -- here Abramovic is eating a raw onion, there she is with a snake on her head -- and there are the interactive pieces. In addition to the live nude performers (many of whom have complained about inappropriate advances by museum-goers), these works help a viewer move from the visual sphere and closer into Abramovic's mind.
However, the experience "is much more than a staring contest," noted Dimitri, seated on line next to me during my more recent visit.
A graphic designer and photographer from New Jersey who'd come ready to wait for the day, Dimitri became interested in "The Artist Is Present" after seeing the live cam online, and subsequently creating his own version with screengrabs.
Dorel, a New Yorker who'd also been waiting since the museum opened that day, was visiting with her 16-year-old daughter. She too was sucked in by the web cam, which her daughter had shown her. It was her third visit to the show. The first, she said, was overwhelming, and on the second visit her daughter was "the one who kind of got it." Now she was back again, but with a bad sunburn, so unsure whether she'd endure the wait for an actual audience with the artist.
What is it about this woman in a chair? In New York City each day, millions of people sit across from other perfect strangers on subway trains. Here, doing just that, the viewers often start to cry. Like the woman shown here; it took her 189 minutes before she broke down in tears. Though others crack much sooner. And they all wait in line to do so. The sitting becomes part of the experience. I found myself staring at Abramovic from afar, in her long white gown and powerful side braid, wondering trivial thoughts that slowly built up and ran around my brain: Was she beautiful? I couldn't decide. I guess all faces look the same, I thought then, two eyes, a nose and a mouth. Do they look the same to her? Does she have face nausea from looking at too many people?
Sometimes, I noticed, she would close her eyes and bow her head, inducing the current fellow sitter to leave. Did that mean she was tired of that particular person!? Or maybe she was just trying to egalitarianize the line.

With no answer for my own thoughts during the first visit, I started talking to the patient people waiting around me – Kevin, 36, was visiting from Rhode Island and was, like most people I talked to, prepared to stay until closing time. For him, the waiting was part of it – "I've been to MoMA a ton of times, and I've never sat and just people watched, and contemplated," he told me. Abramovic, it seems -- by inducing viewers to watch her -- has also led them to notice each other more.
Of course, there are always exceptions.
For my part, though I never got to stare deep into her eyes, thanks to
Susannah Edelbaum lives in Brooklyn. She's covered gallery shows for Art Cat and more gallery shows, plus fun fashion stuff, for Gen Art Pulse.












Comments:
Add a comment
Saturday 08 May
By Cassandra
I particpated in a similar exercise many years ago in India at an ashram outside Bombay. 180 of us sat in pairs staring into each other's eyes for half an hour before moving oon to the next pairing. To this day I'n not sure of the mechanism at workm but I do know it was iintensely moving .... after a time one had the sense of going beyond the body into the other person's soul. There were tears and many connections made in that small space of time.
Interesting to see this exericse repeated in quite another ... and more public settiing .....
Reply
Tuesday 11 May
By brittany
umm yeah i dont get this at all
Monday 10 May
By Alisa skinner
Being with another while looking into the others eyes, we realize we are One.The tears release our fears, our feelings of isolation and loneliness in a world where human emotions are something to manipulate, coerce and commercialize for capitol gain.
Tuesday 11 May
By Jan
It was the viewer who had the tears. The sign next to the model read, "Yep, I voted for Obama."
Tuesday 11 May
By Tavita
I too participated in a similar exercise during a workshop here in Puerto Rico. I agree with you. It's so intensive to see beyond the body... see your partner's soul (In my case was a stranger who sat in front of me) then see your own soul... I saw my fears, my sadness, my strengths... uff... it was moving...
Maybe this artist got the idea from some kind of exercise like the ones we participated...
Tuesday 11 May
By PANTYsniffer
looks like potsie webber
Tuesday 11 May
By sugarcreekchile
So it is to be able to present ridiculous exhibits like this that MOMA has sold off paintings it owned by Pablo Picasso and Jackson Pollock and that taxpayer's money through federal funding is being wasted on. A collage of her eating an onion, putting a snake on her head, etc., nude performers, and sitting in a chair staring at people. If that's art then my husband should get federal funding as he chomps raw onions, my kid should get federal funding because he's an expert at sitting silent with a blank stare on his face when you ask him about something, the local strip club should get federal funding as they have nude perfomers and let's not forget to fund all those snake handler churches. Surprise, we're all artists and we'll be happy to charge $20 admission like MOMA does for people to watch us.
It's amazing what passes for art and what gullible people are so willing to applaud. The Picasso and Pollock are gone and Abramovic is laughing all the way to the bank. I just remembered my cat litter box needs dumping. Maybe, I should just sell it to MOMA since it's a piece of contemporary art created by extremely creative felines.
Monday 10 May
By Kevintripod
WTF ????
Reply
Monday 10 May
By Worddriver
What drives me nuts about this article is not the subject matter but that the writer can't write proper English. You wait "in" line, not on line, unless there is actually a line physically drawn on the floor. The pronoun for a web cam is "that" not "which." Augghhh!!!
Monday 10 May
By Mark
This is stupid!
Reply
Monday 10 May
By Billy
I have better idea! We could spice things up a bit by placing a toilet bowl full of water with one single turd floating in it directly betweent the two of them and see which one of them can stare at it the longest. The first one to start crying and flush it, loses...
Monday 10 May
By jredsj
And this passes for art? I could put my garbage can up there and say its art.
Reply
Monday 10 May
By Alex
Hey jreds, please don't do that! Someone else has already claimed his garbage can to be a work of art. I saw one on exhibit years ago. You might be sued for "theft of artistic creative thought"! :-)
Monday 10 May
By blarg
how existential...
Monday 10 May
By poot
first, jred, you have to be intelligent enough to grasp the concept of "art." I'd suggest you figure out that part before you make snotty, unintelligent comments.
Monday 10 May
By Raven Black
It has been done!!!!!
Monday 10 May
By Kelly
Been done!
Tuesday 11 May
By Christi
yes this is art... Such as a painting or music even dancing.. Art is a a form of expression.. Think outside of the box
Monday 10 May
By D. Robersen
WHAT A LOAD OF BULL!
Reply
Monday 10 May
By savagemouse
I don't get this.
Reply