This month, Glamour's June cover features three models in swimsuits bearing the headline "Curvy? Skinny? It's All Good!" with an accompanying feature on the models and a sexy summer swimsuit spread inside. Glamour makes an interesting pitch: One of the women is sought-out plus-size model Crystal Renn, one is a 29-year-old mother who was one of Prada's token "curvier" models at their spring show, and one is a traditionally beautiful Sports Illustrated model who is blond and has "big boobs" and is married to tennis pro Andy Roddick. Only problem: It's a little hard to tell which model is supposed to be plus-size.
Attribute it to the lull between cups of coffee, but this writer had to check the caption and verify hair colors to distinguish: "Oh, that's Crystal Renn." If one closely scrutinizes the cover photo, one can see that Renn is a little larger than the other women ... but not at all large enough to devote the magazine's cover to making a point. (In fact, an outline of Renn's ribcage peeks out on the cover photo.)
Memo to Glamour: There is really nothing revolutionary or subversive about running photos of three hot models in swimsuits, with long hair, big boobs and undimpled, cellulite-free legs.
Besides, this Glamour feature feels like a repackaging of previous spreads and features on loving your body at every size that
the mag ran in February, last November, last September and last May. This isn't a huge problem -- Cosmopolitan, for example, is definitely guilty of recycling their sex advice -- but just as Cosmo has sex tips, is Glamour's preaching of the importance of using a wide variety of models, then running photos of small to average-size women becoming their calling card?To give Glamour some credit, it's great that they're not making like Ralph Lauren and showing us Photoshopped photos of models whose heads appear wider than their waists or putting Heidi Montag on the cover to talk more about her 10 plastic surgeries in one day.
But Glamour readers seem to be expecting more. On the Web version of this month's cover story, the third commenter on the post, named "Conflicted" wrote:
"It's disappointing how thin Crystal is. For a cover and editorial supposedly showing variety, there is actually very little body variety here. Crystal doesn't even look like a size 12 (and a size 12 is pretty small anyway). If you'd used at least a size 16, like the model in the Lane Bryant commercials, that would have offered an actual range of figures."
Minutes later, a fourth commenter wrote:
"I have to admit I'm disappointed with this as well. Crystal is very beautiful, but there truly is very little variety here. As for the 'curvier' models at fashion shows, it seems to me that it was just skinny women with large breasts. It would be nice to see a woman with some hips or booty every once in a while!"
Crystal Renn -- that's her as she appears in the shoot, above -- herself told Glamour, "Women will accept themselves when they see more [body] types ... This is the new normal." And she's right: She looks like a normal, healthy woman, which means there's room for models a little smaller -- and a lot of room for models larger -- than she is.
Don't worry, Glamour -- there's more than enough space on your cover for a size 16.
Liz Funk is a New York–based author, freelance writer and speaker. Her first book, "Supergirls Speak Out: Inside the Secret Crisis of Overachieving Girls" was published last year by Simon and Schuster.More Good Stuff on the Web:
Is There a Connection between Food and Sex?
I'm the Daughter of a Serial Killer
10 Things You Should Never Say To A Guy











Comments:
Add a comment
Thursday 06 May
By tl
BRAVO!!!!!!!
Thursday 06 May
By sc
Those three girls aren't even close to being plus size. give me a break, they just look healthy not like skeletons, but plus size not even close.
Reply
Thursday 06 May
By Laura
I agree with 'bunny'. What defines a 'real woman'? We come in ALL shapes and sizes! Clearly, Crystal is 'larger' than the the other girls, no one has to squint to see that, but she still looks heathly AND so do the other girls! A size 12 can be healthy or unhealthy, just depends on your height!
Reply
Thursday 06 May
By robin
ummm...who cares?
Reply
Thursday 06 May
By tl
The model on the left is CLEARLY the plus size model. Look at her stomach, which she is clearly sucking in. It's so obvious. Stop making a big thing about this.
Reply
Thursday 06 May
By terry
its amazing how many fat women are out there who need to defend their fatness. there are guys who like fat women. its a personal choice but because theses guys have mental problems i hope the fat women dont trick themselves into thinking that being overweight is normal
Reply
Thursday 06 May
By GypsyLady
Um, ti, is your stomach perfect? Do you expect every woman to be perfectly toned and flawless in every way? The 'plus-size' model who is just as lovely as her more slender fellow models does not have a big stomach. The photo shows more of her stomach than the other ladies, but that is because that is how they are angled in their poses, not because she's 'sucking in'.
And, no, I'm not a fat person trying to defend my flab. I'm perfectly normal weight and average height, and totally willing to admit I'm average physcially. But I take care of myself and work out 4 times a week. Do I judge others if they are not physically flawless? Of course not, because I'm not either.
The reason why it's treated as such a big deal is that how we view other people's bodies as everything to do with how we view our own and our concept of beauty.
Reply
Thursday 06 May
By Sarah Bee
seeing all the comments on here make me sick. Being small does not mean you look bad or boyish, and being "curvier" does not make you fat.
Im a size zero, and im hot...screw everybody who says skinny girls arent. Women are beautiful and you are just as bad as the critics to say anything below a size six or a size TWELVE is not a Woman.
Reply
Friday 07 May
By TechCoquette
I think what's so frustrating about this is like Glamour is doing it now and patting themselves on the back every time. Like the picture of Lizzie with the belly pooch was so cool because it was just THERE! No "OH LOOK AT US! We're SO DIFFERENT!" Now it's just being used as a marketing tool which is annoying. Add that to the fact that Crystal is so gorgeous and so not fat, it's not like "oh look a model who looks like us!"
Reply
Sunday 09 May
By Myrmphred
Crystal may not be plus-sized in the regular world, but one must realize in the size zero dominated fashion world she is considered plus sized. I think she looks fantastic. She definitely does have a bigger bone structure than a lot of other women, and that's why she's "plus sized." Note that she is in shape!!! Her stomach is pretty flat and she looks healthy. She doesn't have rolls of fat falling over her swimsuit. I don't think the fashion industry should be using models with protruding ribs, nor should they use models with fat rolls. They should use models that look healthy, and I think all 3 look healthy. The whole idea of calling someone "curvy" when they are overweight really annoys me too. Curvy means you have big boobs, a TINY waist, and solid hips. NOT a bigger stomach than the rest of your body like so many women try to claim as curvy.
Reply
Saturday 08 May
By Advanced Colon Max
I think it's sad how they consider these women to be "plus sized". There are many real plus sized women who would love to have bodies like these women, it seems that the "plus size" is actually getting smaller as we move into the future and a new standard is set!
Kathy
Advanced Colon Max
Reply
Saturday 08 May
By Advanced Colon Max
I think it's sad how they consider these women to be "plus sized". There are many real plus sized women who would love to have bodies like these women, it seems that the "plus size" is actually getting smaller as we move into the future and a new standard is set!
Kathy
Advanced Colon Max
Reply
Thursday 13 May
By kelly
The cover and that single shot of Crystal are probably heavily Photoshopped. Unbelievable as that totally goes against the point of the article. She does NOT look like a size 12 in these photos.
Reply
Monday 10 May
By princessmommy
You really can not see a big difference between the three ladies,they aere all thin looking to me.BUT I have a 7 year old little girl and she is very small, but she already looks at magizines and thinks that if she eats a cookie or drinks a milkshake or just lives life like any normal chlid she will get fat and no one will like her.We need to think about our children and quit damaging their minds and bodies before they even hit pubertiy.EVERYONE IS BEAUTIFL NO MATTER THEIR SIZE......... QUIT STEREO TYPING:(
Reply
Monday 10 May
By Nicole
I was actually approached by Glamour last summer to appear in the dress your body section. I was pretty pissed at the end of the whole thing and chose not to appear on the Today show because the whole time I was at the shoot I was called "plus size girl"... Im 5'9" and a size16- I know thats not tiny but but certainly not PLUS! I shop at regular dept. stores and wear a size Large. I dont even shop at Lane Bryant or any plus size stores but they treated me like I was HUGE!! They made me wear a dress that I would never in a million years wear in real life, it was frumpy and covered everything. It was a size 20 at least and pinned the whole thing up the back to make it fit. Then they made me sit around alllll day while all the "skinny" girls went first. I just was so angry the way they man handled me, were so phony and then acted like they were doing me a favor by having me there. Just FYI to Glamour, if the average size girl is a 14/16 and she reads your mag to find out that you're calling her "plus size" she's going to be offended. It doesnt really matter what size you are as long as youre healthy so I don't see why they make such a big deal about having a normal sized girl in there. Glamour needs to remember that a size 2 may be average in NYC but in the rest of America it is not.
Reply
Monday 10 May
By tiffany
I completely agree that it would be so satisfying to regularly see size 16 women in magazines (and all visual media for that matter), without someone first announcing, "brace yourselves- we're about to show you a full figured woman, oh, but, its okay, she's pretty". and, i would love to see some women like me that look like 12 year old boys- its really unfair to think that just because i'm as flat as a board means i'm any less of a woman. (yes, i have birthed a child, so dont use that excuse either).
Reply
Monday 10 May
By Khassi
A blonde with big breasts? Where? There isn't one on the cover.
And Crystal is pretty, but she's not curvy, plus- size or sexy. Ashley Graham on the other hand... The fashion industry needs to realixe that these skinny little girld are not sexy.
To put it simply: Fail.
Reply
Monday 10 May
By mikevickisadirtynigger
There is a HUGE difference between curvy women and fat women. These cows get this idea that because guys like curves that gives them the OK to stuff their faces. Another thing, I get tired of hearing guys say that they like curvy women and not skinny women as if that's hip or different. NO guy likes super skinny chicks. We all love curvy women people.
Reply
Tuesday 11 May
By PANTYsniffer
more cushion for the pushin'
Reply
Tuesday 11 May
By LOL
They all look the same to me! Seriously, does anyone else think they all look the same? I take a step back and there's no difference. They all look small/medium-chested, slender, Caucasian, fair, strong jawline, etc. etc. etc. Very typical. And they're expecting us to see something some diversity? This glamour world has an obvious rigid standard....and it's BORING!
Reply