Fact: I want to be a successful businesswoman. I never want to feel like I have to rely on a man to pay for my clothes, travel, entertainment, food, housing ... anything. Which is not say I don't enjoy receiving gifts, but when it comes to my relationships, I've made a conscious decision to strive to be the breadwinner.I think it's important to preface this whole philosophy with a little background information. I grew up in small-town New York where almost every one of my friends' mothers was a stay-at-home mom. My mother, on the other hand, was a high-powered businesswoman taking over the accounting world one high-wealth client at a time. My dad became the person my younger brother and I turned to for help with our homework, the regular fetcher of forgotten items at home, and our ride to soccer practice on weekends.
All that is not to say that my mom wasn't present or influential in my life. Despite having a stereotypical "man's job," my mother was not an overworked, tired, bitter woman who did not have time to get to know her kids because she was too busy taking care of her tumbler of scotch.
On the contrary, my mom is one of the most wonderful and nurturing people in my life. It's clichéd, but as a young woman I see a lot of my peers looking to textbooks and history books to find inspirational women to admire. I draw inspiration from all that my mom has accomplished in her career and her personal life. (So, take that all you aloof working dads! You can have a relationship with your kids and be a successful partner at a firm!)
My desire to be the breadwinner in my romantic relationships may very well have started with my mother's influence. Her advice, in a nutshell? "Don't rely on anyone other than yourself." It might also have something to do with my own desire to be successful, but what I really think it's about is ... sex.
The May 2010 issue of Marie Claire featured a cover story in which author (and alpha woman) Judith Newman profiles several women who are frustrated with being the sole breadwinner in their relationships. A recently divorced publicist is quoted as saying, "When my husband stopped having sex with me, he said that my haranguing him about his lack of income killed his desire [to sleep with me]."
Along the same lines, Wharton Professor Betsey Stevenson published a paper titled "The Paradox of Declining Female Happiness" (yikes) in the National Economic Bureau of Research, explaining the contradiction of female happiness and success. She begins on a positive note by saying that, in the past 35 years, the lives of women have improved dramatically on many levels. She also calls to light, however, the fact that the "measures of subjective well-being indicate that women's happiness has declined both absolutely and relative to men." While quality of life has improved, statistically, female happiness is on a downward trend.
Stevenson's research and Newman's article seem to point to the conclusion that women simply can't be successful in both the boardroom and the bedroom, but I beg to differ. I think we can have it all and be happy about it. The women in Newman's article seem to belittle their lovers rather than encourage and respect them. Women fought for years to enter the workplace when everyone told us we didn't belong there. Why should men be denied respect and understanding if they choose to bow out of a traditional workaholic role? And, if examined with that thought in mind, is it not these women's own fault that they are starved for sexual stimulation? If, on the other hand, they embraced the new "family unit," would their husbands not also aim to please, just as the stay-at-home moms of decades before us have done?
You see, the more I thought about why exactly I had an urge to bring home the bacon, the more I realized that, in addition to wanting a decorated career path, all previous personal field testing has proven that financially challenged men are significantly better in the sack.
The unemployed -- or otherwise fiscally lean men in my life -- have been willing to do whatever it takes to make sure I'm happy in bed. If you can't slap down the plastic to pay for dinner, you better know how to make it work for dessert. Previous encounters with suits and money clips have proven that these gentlemen are more concerned with their own climaxes than mine. How many times have you heard your girlfriends say, "This weekend Wesley took me to Jean Georges and I totally repaid him with a 45-minute blow job." Well ... I want that blowjob!

For so long it's been assumed that a woman needs to acknowledge and reward her male counterpart's hard work. I am more than willing to put in the hard work to be the Mrs. Don Draper to my Mr. Betty in exchange for his love and support.
Now some might worry that this might emasculate a man, and it very well might. But, frankly, I don't want to be with That Guy. The man I want to be with would be totally OK with a successful, powerful woman by his side; the man I want to be with won't have a problem if someone accidentally puts "Mr. and Mrs. G. Cecile Cooper" on a table assignment; the man I want to be with especially won't mind having to ask me for an allowance to buy a new HDTV. I want the man who not only has his own goals and dreams, but wants to wholeheartedly support me in mine. And I don't want to pressure my lover into taking a job he doesn't feel passionately about just because of the inflated salary and dreams of a dual-income home. I have no problem with providing for the both of us. Plus there's a significant added bonus: great bedroom activities.
Marie Claire may say that it's difficult to balance power and femininity, but I say that a strong, intelligent and successful woman is a beautiful woman. I mean come on, it's the 21st century and women have worked hard to succeed in the workplace.
Frankly, we're ready to start reaping the benefits -- including receiving obligatory oral sex.
With all these facts and opinions, the last thing I can say about wanting to be a breadwinner is that I'm currently taking applications for a caring, kind, humorous, good-looking and financially challenged man to spend my nights with. Overachievers -- at least at the office -- need not apply.
G. Cecile Cooper writes for It's Not Okay to Look where she and her co-writer, Virginia Clarkson, dish on dating disasters, male fails and general dating follies told through the eyes of two Brooklynites.
More man/woman debates on Lemondrop:
+ Marry Him: The Divisive New Book That Urges You to Settle
+ Why I Vote We Abolish The Words "Husband" and Wife"
+ I Fell Too Hard for My Craigslist Sugar Daddy












Comments:
Add a comment
Wednesday 14 April
By roxy
about time someone said it! i totally agree that a strong, independent woman is beautiful, made even more so if she has money in the bank. i too have also found that guys who are low on cash feel the need to work harder to get me off, and it is so worth paying for the date for
Reply
Thursday 15 April
By Virginia
"Frankly, we're ready to start reaping the benefits -- including receiving obligatory oral sex."
Haha, right on, Cecile! Fantastic piece!
Reply
Wednesday 14 April
By Virginia
"Frankly, we're ready to start reaping the benefits -- including receiving obligatory oral sex."
Hahaha! Right on, Cecile! A hilarious read - Fantastic job!
Reply
Wednesday 14 April
By E.
So... basically, you want the power in your relationship. Ok. Have fun?
Reply
Thursday 15 April
By Black Iris
The author has some seriously outdated ideas about women and what at-home moms do.
1. If my husband made me apply for an allowance to buy anything, I'd leave.
2. If he demanded sex in exchange for presents, I'd punch him a few times on my way out the door.
I assume she's joking and would never actually treat a guy like a peon just because she earned more money.
And before you think you're completely different from an at-home mom, almost all the mothers I know cut back on their careers in significant ways. Not surprisingly most women earn less than their husbands. Most moms would rather not work full-time (this is even more true now than it was 20 years ago). So you don't have to actually stay home with the kids to end up with a husband who is the main breadwinner.
As for the question, do female breadwinners have better sex? It's complicated. Having a person who is at home probably allows a couple to have more time for sex. On the other hand, most families with an at-home parent have small children which works against having sex. But I suspect that if you could do a study and control for income and the age and number of children, you just might find that families with an at-home mom or dad were having better sex.
Reply
Sunday 03 October
By CatcherSei
I think the answer to your question also relies on the personalities of the people involved. I feel exactly the way the author does, and when I told my guy I'd gotten a job with a really good starting wage, he said, "Damn! Want to be my sugar mama?" and sex, for me, has played out just like the author described with both the fiscally lean guys and the better off guys I've dated.
But if you don't have the same goals as the author you're coming from a completely differently place so of course you'll be experiencing those scenarios differently.
Saturday 17 April
By Crystal Hair
A smile perked up when reading this.
Not by choice did I end up the main bread winner in my relationship. I just happened to fall in love with a man who made less than I.
The benefits of this arrangement include enjoying a man who seems to have enough attention, less stress (than an overworked "dream catch"), and endless creativity to nurture my emotional and physical desires.
In past relationships I've experienced dominant males attempts to employ power through financial strengths, and believe me it's not sexy nor does it keep me warm at night.
In knowing this, the love I receive from partner now isn't a result of my financial puppeteering.
Point Blank- I know I earn enough to support myself and most of him. So what do I need at the end of the day?
A man who takes turns doing both dishes and dinner, has no problem being my personal shopping cart/consultant when trying on clothes, (because he's next!) and most importantly someone who sees me truly as an equal.
But believe, he challenges me and attempts to show me who the MAN really is, in running, jiu jitsu, paintball wars, and baseball/basketball. (because again we do all those things together as well ! )
And Black Iris- drink a cup of "reality joe" This is 2010- If you think a husband doesn't want/expect an extra special spice in his chili, a perfect crease in his shirt, or wouldn't love a a little different twurk or bend while you're dancing in bed-, your dillusional.
After a hard day's work bringing home the bread, male or female it would be nice to come home to a full spread.
Reply
Monday 11 October
By Black Iris
Not sure how your comment relates to my post. Everyone wants a husband or wife who does nice things. My point is that anyone who expects to get what they want in bed BECAUSE they earn more money is an asshole. That applies to a woman who earns more, too.
Modern at-home parents don't put up with that kind of treatment.
Friday 23 April
By Eileen
Been there, done that! I went for power in the work place, and my husband stayed home with the kids - they tell me know he was always depressed and lying on the sofa. Get someone with his own career, maybe not so high powered, and own interests - what is wrong with sharing. Believe me it is easier psychologically if you know someone has your financial back.
Reply
Sunday 18 July
By tara
Well, well, well, sounds like a few women seriously mistaken.
In reality to make a man cook and look after kids while the women earns the bread is almost same as trying to make a man become pregnant and give birth. Its so unnatural and as others have commented he will be totally depressed in no time and connot deliver on anything let alone good sex.
Wake up girls!! Men are men and women are women. Cannot change their nature just because you think you can!!
Reply
Saturday 02 October
By Lisa
I totally agree. I think too many women settle for whoever is around or ready and I am too picky to do that. So I decided I needed to support myself to have any real options. I'm not interested in dating someone just because they are available. Also the guys who decide they are ready to settle down and have kids and want to choose the woman who is going to settle down with them and bare these kids (regardless of whether or not she is interested).... I suppose that's sweet but those kinds of come-ons make me want to run away screaming ...
Can we stop framing 'male internal clock angst' as OMG the world is going to explode (probably from the lack of white babies) because not all girls are interested (in me)? Modern girls have more options than barefoot and pregnant at 21 this means they are going to be more selective. That is just a function of economic demand. :)
@ Tara. You are a moron. ...
Reply
Thursday 12 May
By Mark
Just remember, the more you make, the less likely you will find a man, UNLESS you are willing to consider men who earn less than you.
Men have been happily marrying down for a very long time, with no hesitation. Women, on the other hand, are having trouble doing the same. Perhaps those "socially constructed gender roles" aren't as socially constructed as feminists once thought.
Reply