Turns out men at ESPN can't tell their female colleagues What Not to Wear on-air.Hannah Storm, left, co-host of "SportsCenter" has been known for sporting some pretty un-newscasterly outfits, but it was these boots -- red, knee-high, kitten-heeled -- that sent her colleague Tony Kornheiser, co-host of ESPN's "Pardon the Interruption," walking after he took aim at her outfit on his Feb. 16 radio show:
"I'd like to point out Hannah Storm in a horrifying, horrifying outfit today," he said. "She's got on red go-go boots and a Catholic school plaid skirt way too short for somebody in her 40s or maybe early 50s by now."
He then compared Storm to a "sausage casing," before recanting: "I mean, I know she's very good, and I'm not supposed to be critical of ESPN people ... but Hannah Storm today, come on, now! Stop! What are you doing? It's what I would call a Holden Caulfield fantasy at that point."
The facts: Hannah Storm is 47. Kornheiser, despite lobbing an apology soon after his out-of-line comments ("I'm a troll, look at me. I have no right to insult what anybody looks like or what anybody wears!"), was suspended by the network today.
And while we consider his "time out" one small slap for a man who stuck his fashion opinions in where they don't belong, and one giant boot stride forward for womankind, not everyone is inclined to agree with us.
"A big part of Kornheiser's shtick is making jokes about media personalities (including himself)," wrote our friends at Fanhouse today, "and if Kornheiser isn't allowed to have fun at the expense of ESPN colleagues from time to time, both his radio show and 'Pardon the Interruption' are going to be a lot less entertaining. From that perspective, the suspension is probably a little harsh."
In truth, the rant raises many an issue -- and not just how long Kornheiser should be forced to cool his heels.
Is Storm too old to wear what we would argue are regrettable get-ups on anyone? Is any woman for that matter? And what sort of message does Kornheiser's "shtick" send to Storm's three daughters -- and the millions of women out there for whom she's one of the lone female sportscasters they see on ESPN?
Because, for us, that's the crux of the issue: While we, too, would prefer to see those tacky red boots burned, the thought of a male colleague policing a 47-year-old woman's wardrobe -- especially a woman who has broken numerous barriers in sports journalism -- is enough to make us swallow our pride and stride around in icky hooker boots in support of her.
Then again, maybe the boots themselves are to blame. After all, the last time a pair of tall boots sent this many tongues wagging was 2005, when then–Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice sported black knee-high heeled boots to Wiesbaden Army Airfield in Germany, birthing a million fashion critics concerned about her "sexy" footwear.
What do you think: Is Hannah's on-air wear too out-there? And was Kornheiser's rant flat-out sexist -- or purely provocative?
More Good Stuff on the Web:
Babies FAIL Too (My First Fail)
Not an Ergonomically Correct Office Chair (Monday Through Friday)
Just How Dumb is The Learning Channel? (Cracked)
How to avoid getting your heart broken, once and for all (Lemondrop)
Katie Hintz-Zambrano is a San Francisco–based freelance writer covering fashion, music and health for AOL's StyleList, Style.com, Elle.com, Details, Nylon and Vibe. Although she supports Hannah Storm's right to wear tight, knee-high red boots, she much prefers ballet flats and Jack Purcell sneakers.












Comments:
Add a comment
Tuesday 23 February
By itchybits
The outfit was regrettable indeed! Her outfits shouldn't be grabbing the attention - shouldn't it be what she is saying? Doesn't she have a stylist? The men are dressed conservatively and so should she. While she has broke ground she isn't doing anyone favors dressing like that. A woman in my office wore an almost identical outfit on our first dress down Friday. Oh my god they re-wrote the code shortly thereafter.
Reply
Tuesday 23 February
By kait
i dont think women should be sportscasters at all. i am a women, who watches sports, and i hate the women sportscasters.
Reply
Wednesday 24 February
By Joseph Ebey
Agreed - Unless it is a woman's sport where women athelets who once played the game are reporting.
Tuesday 23 February
By BethInNY
I adore Tony Kornheiser, and think that his suspension is a shame. Hannah Storm did look horrifying. She should be proud that she's broken so many barriers in an intensely male-dominated field, but she made a poor choice in wardrobe, and just because she's a woman doesn't make her immune to criticism. The PTI guys often criticize the sartorial flubs of sports figures (Rex Ryan recently came under fire after exposing his terrifying belly while switching shirts at a hockey game), and it's funny. As far as I see it, Hannah Storm has a right to dress herself, and Tony Kornheiser has a right to point out if she looks ridiculous.
It may not be nice for Storm's daughters to hear or read this story, and they may not find it funny. But what kind of message does Kornheiser's suspension send? That men and women are to be treated differently, and what is acceptable for one gender is unacceptable for the other. And that's not a feminist message that I want my (future) daughters to have to accept.
As the photo at the top of this article shows, Storm normally looks fantastic. I haven't heard if she has made an official comment in response to this to-do; my hope is that she will laugh it off and continue doing her job, minus one pair of awful boots and one tacky skirt.
Reply
Tuesday 23 February
By SJ
As a female, it aggravates me to see women sportscasters dressing provocatively while their male counterparts dress pretty conservatively. It seems that women sportscasters are only on-air as eye candy, not as legitimate sources of sports news. I don't think Kornheiser's comments were meant to be sexist, just provocative. If I were Storm, I'd only be irritated that I wasn't around to throw a dig back to Kornheiser.
Reply
Friday 26 February
By Lilacs
You're right, she looked more like a hooker. Is she bragging about sleeping her way to the top? Was this a visual hint to some upper level network honcho that she was just dressing up to his opinion of her?
Tuesday 23 February
By rachel - MMAHotStuff
Wow, kait. That's so sad. I think women can do anything they want to for a career. As can men. Having said that, maybe you should stay off the internet and go feed your horses so they can pull the buggy tonight.
#JustSayin
Reply
Wednesday 24 February
By Rhonda
Nuh uh! Feedin' the horses is men's work! She needs to get in thar and wash up 'em dishes afore her man comes home.
Wednesday 24 February
By Bran
I don't know, Rachel. I hope I never live to see a male Hooters server. But I agree with you. With most professions (Hooters excluded) there should be no gender discrimination. Especially nowadays with the profession of sportscaster. Women are far more into sports today than they used to be. Hell, I wasn't into watching football until my wife got me into it! I don't watch ESPN, so I don't know whether Hannah Storm is a good sportscaster or not, but what I am sure of is that there are women out there who are just as knowledgable about sports as men are, and if they want to be a sportscaster then more power to them.
Tuesday 23 February
By Kay
The mechanics of the outfit were fine, skirt, sweater, boots, it was just the plaid skirt looked a little gooby for my taste but I would never wear a plaid skirt or pants. The critic was out of line absolutely! As to her age, seriously, she clearly takes care of herself, she is not old, her breasts were not hanging out or forced into a too tight top, the skirt was an acceptable length. In our forties is when a lot of us finally are comfortable and confident in our own skin, not only that, it won't be to many more years before youth is gone so I say more power to you! Enjoy your last years of youth, I know I will enjoy mine.
Reply
Tuesday 23 February
By Babette
She's the "Cougar" on ESPN, isn't she? hahahah!
Executives should BE PROMOTING Tony Kornheiser! Now that his very humorous joke has gotten so much attention, ESPN can be assured their ratings will increase! Besides, had he criticized a MAN, would it be such an issue? As long as they are Equal Opportunity Offenders, they're A- OK in my book!
Reply
Tuesday 23 February
By MicheLe E.
I'm not fond of females sportscasters but if they can do the job professionally, that's fine. The females should he held to a female/feminine version of the dress code applicable to male sportscasters. I know I certainly don't want to see a male in a muscle shirt or tank top.
The red boot/red plaid skirt combo was fine.
Reply
Tuesday 23 February
By kait
womens sportscasters are only on television to look at (and quite frankly they dont look that good anyway) and it seems to me that most female sportscasters haven't a clue as to what they are doing and oftentimes say the most aggravating ridiculous things. i just dont like them. i am entitled to my opinion and there was no need for your rude comment.
Thursday 25 February
By BG
I actually own a pair of boots like that. I would never style them thusly, but I must still defend the ownership of red boots. Red boots are awesome, so there.
Now then. That was some terrible styling. Regardless of whether you think it was age appropriate, it's simply a bad outfit. It should have been screen-tested beforehand and obvious wasn't. It doesn't fit on the set and more importantly, it doesn't look professional. It looks like a juniors outfit from Sears, something matchy-matchy you see on a 13 year old, and I don't think she should be immune to criticism for it.
But I do not understand what is up with the nature of those comments. The skirt is too short for a sportscaster, but NOTHING about it says "catholic school girl." Similarly, nothing about the boots says "go-go boots." This outfit doesn't make her look sexy, it makes her look like she's trying too hard to look young, so why did he feel the need to throw in all these sexually charged comments? It makes him look like a sleeze. All that's missing is, "and look, it's red! Hookers wear red!"
A suspension is a bit harsh, but I do think he wandered too far away from joking criticism for comfort.
Reply
Wednesday 24 February
By critic#1
You're missing the point. Screw the outfit. Who cares? The point is that he would'nt have been suspended if he had made an equally harsh comment to a man. That's the sexist part. If she can't take it, maybe she should go work for Lifetime or something. That way she won't get her little feelings hurt.
Equal means equal. No double standards.
Wednesday 24 February
By maryncland
The outfit with the red boots wasn't all that bad I don't think but also wasn't the best. I don't see what the big deal was. I also didn't see the need for Kornheiser to go on a rant about the outfit either. It seemed a little much for something so simple.
Reply
Wednesday 24 February
By Frank
Katie:
You were quoted as referring to Hannah Storm as "a lone female sportscaster at ESPN". This statement, if accurate, is much more damaging to Linda Cohn, Suzy Kolber, et al., at ESPN than Tony Kornheiser's opinion of Storm's choice of attire.
Reply
Wednesday 24 February
By fred
Past her prime and afraid to admit it ... when u dont know sports and dont qualify for SI swimsuit, u either make a spectacle of urself or do the news in a non-major metro account .. Weather channel won't accept u unless u plan to get pregnant
Wednesday 24 February
By Jerry C
Come on ESPN, this is much to do about nothing.
Reply
Wednesday 24 February
By Larz
Yes, women are capable of doing almost anything, but that doesn't mean they should.
Sports are dominated by men on both sides of the TV for a reason -- they are physically superior athletes. Consequently, most people don't want to watch women's sports (example: the WNBA only survives because it is subsidized by the NBA -- otherwise it would be bankrupt.) Likewise, most people don't want to hear women opine about a predominant male activity.
Women sportscasters are on the air for one reason: discrimination laws. What most people don't naturally want has been forced on them by law. So, the broadcasters make the best of a bad situation and choose eye candy. That way, the men can check them out while the women comment on their fashion choices. Meanwhile, the female sportscasters are busy asking the coaches and players how they feel, and the men get on with business as usual.
We don't want them doing play-by-play in the NFL, but some of them make great fighter pilots. Such is the hard truth.
Reply