Call it a literal battle of the sexes: Researchers just revealed that the male Y chromosome is more evolved than ours. The discovery -- unearthed by a female MIT researcher -- shows that the Y chromosome has advanced so much over the last 6 million years that there's now a 30 percent difference between the male genetic code and that of chimps, our nearest ancestor. For the rest of the human genetic code, there's only a 2 percent difference.
Naturally, the findings have men cheering and women scoffing in disbelief over the idea that males could possibly be more advanced. But the researchers caution that just because man's genetic code has evolved doesn't mean his behavior has.
Y Marks the Spot
Jennifer Hughes and her MIT colleague outline the new study in the journal Nature. You can read the full scientific jargon of the two-year research project here.
The abridged version: The Y chromosome rocks because it isn't part of a pair like the rest of our 44 chromosomes, meaning that when gene mutations occur, there's no matching chromosome to overshadow them. But it also has to do with female chimps being little hussies when in heat. By mating frequently with many partners, the females force the males to produce the most and best sperm.
And while 6 million years seems like a long time to us, the changes Y has undergone in that span would take other chromosomes about 310 million years to get right.
This news is remarkable for science because researchers previously thought not only that the X sex chromosome was evolving more rapidly than the Y, but that Y was in danger of becoming extinct all together. So, the news is obviously a self-esteem booster for the previously underachieving, close-to-dying male gender.
The Mudslinging Begins
But thanks to headlines like "Are Men More 'Evolved' Than Women?" neither gender is acting very evolved in its response to the study. Check out these comments from the Huffington Post's piece:
Joan1111 says, "In general terms ... men may be more evolved than women, but they just don't behave like they are. Evolution doesn't necessarily equal emotional maturity."
Suemag adds, "The gender that scratches its' balls and pees outside is NOT more evolved than mine."
Tazirai says, "It's funny that an article comes out.. kinda in defense of men... and it's criticized, because of it's defense of men. We just can't win for losing lol."
Genetics aren't the same as behavior, so Y's rapid advancement doesn't mean men are acting any more advanced than women (nor does it mean their brain power now trumps women's). And even if more gene mutations occur to separate men from their chimp ancestors, we won't see the outcome of the changes in our lifetime.
But the men do deserve a hand for rallying back from near extinction. Somebody cue "I Will Survive."
More Good Stuff on the Web
A dude's plea -- Girls, stop doing this on dates (Lemondrop)
Should you keep a great guy if the sex is bad? (Lemondrop)
Amazing time-waster game ... You won't be able to stop playing (Lemondrop)
5 reasons why living alone rules (Lemondrop)












Comments:
Add a comment
Monday 18 January
By Ozymandias
Cockroaches are more evolved than Homo sapiens. 'More evolved' doesn't necessarily mean smarter or even better, it just means a group or species is more adapted to the environment. If the environment changes, the specialization of the mutations might actually be a disadvantage. I'd also like to point out that we're all human, so what's the damn point in bickering? I'm curious to know if the article is talking about ALL Y chromosomes (as in, cross-species), or just human males. However, I am apparently not curious enough to read the actual research paper. It sounds like she's just talking about human males though...
Reply
Monday 18 January
By Joanna
OZIEMANDIES....
You could not be more accurate.
I am so tired of this transparent crap. Have you noticed how every day there is a new battle of the sexes topic? ANYTHING to keep the battle going
Additionally, So many opportunusts, like the writers on this one, try to keep divisons of all kinds going. Like, my religion is better than yours.... your political party or my political party....your state or my state...it just goes on.
Last week..." MEN PARK THER CARS BETTER THAN WOMEN".
AND WHAT??? Does it mean they get an award?
These so called studies have nothing to do with science or accuracy.
These opportunists are all sluts (male and female) because the Bottom line...
it's all about MONEY...and the more they can get you to fight with each other over it, the more they make.
Monday 18 January
By Nick
Being more evolved, for one thing, might mean being more succinct in your writing!
Monday 18 January
By Tom Klein
Gee...after decades of standardized testing, comparative IQ tests, centuries of of male scientific accomplishments, centuries of magnificent sculptures, paintings, literature, fashion, an unbroken string of male chess champions, Nobel prizes in scientific fields, breathtaking engineering feats, medical and pharmaceutical advances and everything else, someone's finally figured this out? Wow.
Reply
Monday 18 January
By Mo
I don't know where you're getting your information on standardized testing and IQ tests, or whether you're just throwing a bunch of crap around (Hmmm, kinda like the chimps do!), but many of the accomplishments made by men, while amazing and great, does not mean that women are incapable of doing such things. Men, up until the last 100 years have been oppressing women (and in some countries still do), by claiming that we are the inferior sex. So if you are going to say that it's obvious that men are more evolved because of the accomplishments in art, science, fashion, etc., maybe you should realize that women only have equal rights up until recently. I think we have done pretty well for ourselves in that last 100 or so years. So, Tom, get over yourself. What have YOU done lately?
Monday 18 January
By MSO
Be careful. This article is about genes related to difference in gender, not brains. The advancement is in producing more successful Y genes that don't easily succumb to things like potentially bad mutation. X genes have some built in advantages that Y's don't (do your research homework), so the increased evolutionary rate on Y's is good for human beings. The human males are more likely to generate more healthy future offspring. Less likely as a gender to "die off" though a weakening in their genetic make-up.
Regarding Tom Klein's comments:
"Gee...after decades of standardized testing, comparative IQ tests, centuries of of male scientific accomplishments, centuries of magnificent sculptures, paintings, literature, fashion, an unbroken string of male chess champions, Nobel prizes in scientific fields, breathtaking engineering feats, medical and pharmaceutical advances and everything else, someone's finally figured this out? Wow."
...which are not about the point of this article OR the research, my comment is A) who are the people who have set up those tests, and wouldn't they set them up to measure features/abilities they think are important about themselves (males); B) the 'centuries...' bit is because the social (patriarchal) society set-up was geared to supporting and promoting males (again, do your homework).
Seems like if the women had been supported and advanced and lauded the same way in the last centuries, some buckethead would be posting an ignorant statement in that direction, too. Please folks, be proud of who you are, but don't think you should be the all-powerful and mighty whatever over others. Those who do that show they have to invalidate and demean other humans to achieve their 'superior' status. We all come into this world and go out of it the same way. Have respect for your fellow human beings and think before you post.
Thanks for reading this, and for thinking.
Monday 18 January
By Shawn
If Science has proven the Moon Moves away from the Earth each year and also that if the Earth was millions of years old that we would not have a moon then why do we still have one? Maybe Science is wrong about the Millions of years idea?
Tuesday 19 January
By sharilyn
You think all those male achievements had to do with what sex is smarter and nothing to do with power imbalances?? Nothing to do with social structures and gendered roles that prevented women from participating?? I can't believe someone would type or believe something so uneducated and ignorant.
Monday 18 January
By Bob
GOD made man!!
Reply
Monday 18 January
By Mo
What exactly is your point, Bob?
Monday 18 January
By Al
Mo...What part of Bobs statement dont you understand???...
Monday 18 January
By Jeff
Who made god?
Monday 18 January
By GretchenLou
God as the Holy Spirit moved over Mary, a woman, and Jesus was conceived. Man had nothing to do with it.
Monday 18 January
By tennwilliams
not wanting to start a whole faith versus science debate, but I'm curious as to how exactly chromosomes and DNA were analyzed 6 million years ago to have comparative data for current studies. I guess the cavemen, having started their overachieving ways, had microscopes and labs back then also. Kinda ruins all the Geico commercials for me knowing the cavemen were that smart.
Reply
Monday 18 January
By Jeff
tennwilliams it's actually pretty simple. Our ancestors shared a similar genome with us, so by analyzing the difference between our current genome and one without the myriad mutations of the last 6 million years (which can be determined by the fusion of retroviruses in our dna as timeline markers for example), we can figure out how many mutations stuck and of which of the 23 chromosomes it occured in. I know it's not as exciting as the idea of cavemen running genome sequencing labs, but it is what it is.
Monday 18 January
By tennwilliams
thanks for the explanation Jeff. I guess I just forgot that we used to be monkeys. I always do that!
Monday 18 January
By Rico
"I guess I just forgot that we used to be monkeys. I always do that!"
We were never monkeys. You're misplacing a branch of the evolutionary tree. Monkeys are more our cousins than ancestors. If anything, in your nomenclature, we used to be what are called proto-apes, or proto-humans.
Apes, monkeys and humans have a common ancestor. That is not the same as saying that we were once monkeys. Even if you choose to not to accept the theory, at least know what it is you are rejecting.
Monday 18 January
By Da Crypt
Behind every successful man there's a woman. Care to guess what's behind every failure?
Reply
Monday 18 January
By dlsayremn
Does this mean that X didn't need any changes because it is a close to perfect as possible and the Y still isn't quite right?
A male.
Reply
Monday 18 January
By JestNow
Here come the losers LOL!!
Reply