The world was introduced to the SarcMark yesterday, a new piece of punctuation designed to help us convey sarcasm in writing. The @-like swirl with a period in the middle is intended to be used in place of standard end-of-sentence punctuation, because, as the SarcMark site states: "With the spoken word, we use our tone, inflection and volume to question, exclaim and convey our feelings. The written word has question marks and exclamation points to document those thoughts, but sarcasm has nothing!"
At first I thought, Well, that's stupid.
Probably because I have yet to meet an emoticon I like. Simply put, I think if the person you're IMing, texting or emailing can't pick up your tone from contextual clues, you don't know this person well enough to be sarcastic with them in the first place. Or maybe they're just too dumb -- SarcMark or not.
But I found, after a phone call with Paul Sak, the older half of the Michigan-based father-son duo who created the SarcMark, my opinion had changed.
As Sak explained, there's an inherent problem in the fact that written words lacks hand gestures, inflections -- all the fun flourishes that lend verbal communication its nuance.
"In the written word, it's more black and white," says Sak. "A sentence with a period at the end means one thing, but replace it with an exclamation and it takes on a whole new meaning."
And, sure, you could italicize your sarcastic remarks or add a parenthical LOL or j/k, but those, says Sak, make for a convoluted, ugly sentence. And I agree -- the ugly asethetics of emoticons (especially when they start blinking and swirling) fuel my disdain. But what he did convince me of was this: No matter how good a friend someone is, sarcasm just doesn't translate well in type. And somehow I find Sak's little Sarc not nearly as offensive as an emoticon.
It's almost insulting -- using one suggests that you don't know me well enough not to have to translate your every emotion and joke. And then you have the issue of how to punctuate the end of your sentence: ":)." is awfully cumbersome. Plus, let's face it, throwing one at the end of an otherwise passive-aggressive email doesn't soften the blow: It's the coup de grace that convinces me beyond a doubt that you're being a B.
But, since so much of communication today is via the typed word, I need something. And there's a lot to like about the SarcMark.
For example, I like that Sak and his son took pains not to stray too far from our existing punctuation: ! ... , . ; ? :
A closer look reveals -- with the exception of the dash -- all the marks have one thing in common: "It was important to us to create a mark that includes a period," says Sak. "It comes at the end of the sentence and fits nicely."
It was actually Sak's son Doug, now in his mid-30s, who first conceived of the idea eight years ago. Initially, his father was confounded. "Why would you need that?" Eventually, he came around, and the two founded Sarcasm Inc.
First came the design of the SarcMark, then came the software (available at www.sarcmark.com for $1.99), which allows almost any Windows user (they're still hard at work on the 32-bit Windows 7 version) to insert one into her writing simply by pressing CTRL + .
"It's as easy as capitalizing a letter!" enthuses Sak.
The software is also available for Blackberries; Mac and iPhone users may soon have a SarcMark in their futures, too.
I also like the fact that the new-on-the-scene Sark could have another interesting application: Closed-captioned TV, where it would convey a sarcastic tone of voice in newscasts, sports games and other captioned programming.
While I first thought that the SarcMark was just another clever-but-pointless "Web 2.0" scheme -- similar to the tumblrs-turned-book-deals or Twitter-turned-TV-shows (or both, even) -- I'm actually digging it. The fact that it's not spelled "Sarcmarc" helps, too.
Whether it will find a lasting place in modern language can only be left to time, but I have faith that if Lolspeak, emoticons and abbreviations of already short words can endure, the SarcMark can, too. Then again, I've always been an optimist

(On a side note, check out the SarcMark commercial)
More Good Stuff on the Web
A dude's plea -- Girls? Stop doing this on dates (Lemondrop)
Should you keep a great guy if the sex is bad? (Lemondrop)
Amazing timewaster game ... You won't be able to stop playing (Lemondrop)












Comments:
Add a comment
Thursday 14 January
By lamberto
"It's almost insulting -- tacking [an emoticon] on suggests that you don't know me well enough not to have to translate your every joke."
but the sarcmark would do exact same thing -- translate an otherwise unperceived joke.
Reply
Thursday 14 January
By Erin Scottberg
@lamberto To me, there's a difference between punctuation and adding extra characters to your sentence. Just like even your best friend knows the difference between "yeah" and "yeah!" the ! adds extra emphasis. I think the sarcmark could be of the same use without cluttering up your sentences. And emoticons are just too damn cutesy for my liking
Thursday 14 January
By Tony
Sarcasm has always been hard to convery ofer the net, but how is this really going to be practical? Can it be made with normal keyboard keys? like ASCII?
Reply
Thursday 14 January
By Tony
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ASCII
Thursday 14 January
By Tony
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ASCII
Reply
Friday 15 January
By John
No! I hope this does not catch on. I met a chick who would put joke after every unsuccesful attempt at humor. Needless to say, I refused to even text her anymore. Unfortunately, all it takes is for some teeny boppers to get a hold of this and it will spread like wifefire!
Reply
Friday 15 January
By Sandra
Years ago, someone proposed the Interrobang, a punctionation mark that's used for a statement that's a question but also an exclamation. As in, "Are you serious (Interrobang)" or "You're going to do what (Interrobang). I like the idea of a sarcmark, just not sure I want to pay for one (smiley).
Reply
Friday 15 January
By Joe
Oh I'm sure this will catch on! After all, we're sending more and more of "ourselves" to people via some form of text. This is bound to happen becuase we just don't spend close to the same amount of time actually talking with others or spending personal time with people, more and more is done over the net. After all, actually talking to people is so much trouble today! Go over to a friends house and play cards?!?!?! Are you serious?!?!? Wont be long and people will be able to conceive over the net...just download here. All we need is one more thing to take the need of personal interaction out of our lives!!!
Reply
Friday 15 January
By dara
If you need to come right out and say "hey look a me Im being sarcastic" you arent doing it right
Reply
Friday 15 January
By Midwe
I like the good old fashioned eye roll @@
Reply
Friday 15 January
By mcbrion
I think using ANY emoticon until one is sure one "knows" the other person can cause problems. It's not so much what YOU write, but what the person on the other end is "hearing." No matter how good the intentions, sending written communications to someone who is highly insecure, for example, is going to trigger that person's internal securities. A simple line like "Hey, I see you're online again" which could mean you're happy to see them online could have the other person thinking that you're saying "Are you in here yet again?!?!?!"
People read not with their eyes, but with their own emotional balance, and if they're inclined towards fear, anxiety, anger, they will immediately latch onto one of those emotions FIRST. Happy or joyous is not their style, and they will immediately project onto you what's going on inside them. Even the smiley icon can have them thinking you're being sarcastic with a smile to hide it, when your own intention -- and emotion -- is quite purely happy. Emoticons are tricky if people don't know the "you" that you are inside.
Reply
Friday 15 January
By Get Educated!
Instead of trying to invent or use symbols designed to convey information that your pitifully small vocabulary cannot, why not just improve your language skills? Using real sarcasm (or humor) would be preferable to using a symbol that tells the reader, "Hey, I meant that to be sarcastic (or funny)."
Reply
Friday 15 January
By Fosure
I like the idea here but I am not going to pay money for an emoticon. I can use other things to convey my sarcasm just as easily for example this :| or this -__-
Reply
Friday 15 January
By g
Jeez, gimme a break.
Dunno what's worse; egomaniacs who've just gotta make up a new word or term so they can coin a phrase, or one more stupid thing to sell that idiots will buy.
Reply
Friday 15 January
By themeeker
Nice try, but I'm not buying it. On second thought...it's a pretty pathetic try :)
Reply
Friday 15 January
By august
Seems to be promoting being nasty.
Reply
Friday 15 January
By CAROL
IS THE SARCMARK GOING TO BE ADDED TO THE KEYBOARDS NOW???
Reply
Friday 15 January
By Miking821
Am I the only left handed person that noticed the sarc-mark is a very right handed thing to write?
Reply
Friday 15 January
By Amy
Seems like the examples in the commercial weren't really sarcasm.
Reply
Friday 15 January
By Pat
Hey folks, everyone has to make a living. I'm not paying for it but do admire people who come up with these things. Kids will buy anything to be different, it'll sell.
Reply