The end is rarely easy. And, God, can it be awkward. Personally, I don't apply specifics for each gender on how to end a thing (a "thing" being anything that lasts a couple months or seven dates, give or take; ending a "relationship" is a whole other bag of misery). When it comes to the end, whether you're a man dumping a woman, a woman dumping a man, or a gay dude dumping a gay dude, you want it to be as humane as possible. But which method of ending a "thing" is most humane? Let's have a look, from least to most kind.
The "Treaty of Versailles" Breakup
You don't like the other person and don't want to have sex with him/her anymore, but you feel bad; (s)he's "a good person" and you want to break it off like an adult. Bravo. You know what's not adult? Forcing someone to listen to platitudes and compliments while you crush them into a fine paste. It's the "nice" breakup that isn't.
"I enjoyed spending time with you"? Are you talking to an exchange student on the way to his/her departing flight? Just sack up and stop being so "nice."
OK, I know there are mitigating factors -- like if you were set up by someone important to you, if you have mutual friends, if (s)he's got something of yours you really need back. But regardless of the circumstances, it is rarely, rarely a good idea to spend a ton of time talking it out.
Because honestly, what is there to say? Does anyone really want to be complimented by somebody who doesn't want to bone them anymore? Once, a woman told me I was the most "emotionally available" man she'd ever met while breaking up with me. Uh, thanks?
I'm guilty here of the opposite: defaming yourself in the name of kindly dumping the other person. (I have a habit of drunkenly telling women I'm "dangerous" and "nothing but trouble," which are half-truths which really only imply "you're lame.") Everything said during a Treaty is code for "I don't find you sexually attractive." If you found your partner sexually attractive but had other reasons, you'd have to employ a different method, like the Slow Fade or the Lights Out.
The Lights Out (aka the "Michael Douglas")
This is the Treaty's polar opposite, replacing the lengthy detente with the sudden and complete heartlessness of Michael Douglas (pre-Zeta-Jones). One day you think everything's fine, the next you're staring holes into your phone and wondering if you should call the police.
Look, the Michael Douglas happens. If you're thinking about employing it, realize that you also probably need to distance yourself from any mutual friends or acquaintances and any bars you've frequented as a couple. People can react badly to the Douglas, saying mean things when they see you in public. With the Treaty, you make awkward small talk if you see someone again, but the Douglas can breed tense, potentially violent interactions.
But here's the beauty -- first, it's just over. Period. Like death. Second, if you're cruel enough to pull a Michael Douglas, the other person might actively avoid you. I still refuse to get near this bar where I met a girl I really thought I liked -- all because she gave me the fully flared nostrils of the Douglas. Now I can't see her -- I'll be unable to handle the pity in her eyes.
The Slow Fade
How many times I have used the Slow Fade? I couldn't even count. How many times have I had it used on me? A ton.
First, you cancel a date. (The moment someone cancels a date with you and doesn't either seem genuinely sorry and make up for it with plans for an extra-meaningful next date or have a hospital bracelet for an excuse, it's over. ) Then, it gets really, really busy at work. Like, insanely busy. Your weeks become "crazy." You'll hang out soon, really soon, just once the dust settles. Oops, you're headed out of town to see the family!
And ... scene.
Now, the Slow Fade is sort of disingenuous. But. You're distracting him/her from the pain by making a big production of wanting to see him/her, if only things would settle down. The hope is, by the time (s)he figures out what's happening, (s)he doesn't care as much. Which is why it's my preferred method of pulling out.
None are perfect, however. What's your breakup method of choice? (I once heard of the Minnie Driver, but I've never had it explained to me.)
Why a guy picks her (And not you)
[Redacted] writes for Lemondrop when he's not breaking fragile hearts and avoiding Victorian diseases all over the Eastern seaboard. You can send him hate mail and love letters here.













Comments:
Add a comment
Wednesday 09 December
By Joshua5
How you break up with someone depends a lot on how long you have dated and how much intimacy you have shared. It is definitely NOT ok to use the slow fade with someone you have dated exclusively for six months or more. After six months, the other person has invested a significant amount of emotional energy into the relationship and they likely have bonded to you. In this case, the only way to go is a quiet, private place where you can talk face to face. It's going to hurt for sure, but at least they can deal with the devastation in private and start to move on knowing that you will not be back.
I dated a guy for a year. We traveled together and spent holidays and weekends together. In short, we were very close. He went back to school to learn new technology, and I started to notice a coldness to our interactions. When asked if he wanted to talk aka break up with me, he said everything was fine. Then one night he freaks out on me because I touched the hood of his car, and throws me out of his house. Later he said he felt he just did not have time for our relationship and needed to focus on work and school. "I need a break," he said. Don't do this to people. Just be honest and say it's over. Because otherwise it gives hope. Well, he could have told me it was over when I asked to talk instead of saying it was fine. I really thought he was just tired from school. EMOTIONALLY VIOLENT...OUCH!!!
Reply
Wednesday 09 December
By joshua5
To the person who implied it is ok to harass and stalk someone just because they had sex with you and now don't want to have a long-term relationship, are you crazy? Own up to your actions, and stop trying to justify bad behavior. You and you alone are responsible for what you do with your body and with whom. If you feel that you don't want to be sexual until you have some type of commitment, then wait until you have one.
It is well within the social norm to have sex a few months into a relationship (or sooner for some). But sometimes after spending a few months with someone you discover that you're not that into them anymore. It happens, and it does not mean you were using that person just for sex. Just do the breaking up privately, kindly, and definitively so they don't waste time waiting for you. Don't ever say you "need a break" because we all know it's bullshit and it insults the other person gravely.
Reply
Wednesday 09 December
By Dalt
So true! Great to see some honest writing from a guys perspective!
Thank you Lemondrop!
Reply
Wednesday 09 December
By Super Slow Fader
The Slow Fade is the best, because quite often if you run into the woman again, or going through a dry spell then go to flipping through your black book. since she really has no bad breakup memories, Easy Booty Call :)
Reply
Wednesday 09 December
By Ali
Haha, the slow fade the author describes is what happened to me to a tee! The worst slow fade I've experienced was from this jerk I dated for three months. Everything was going great. Suddenly, after he returned from a wedding, the texts, emails, and phone calls started slowing. He was supposed to visit me during the week but said he was too busy (red flag number one). Work suddenly was crazy busy and he didn't have much time to talk or see me (red flag number two). Then, he was out of town that weekend visiting his family (red flag number three, and exactly like the article!). Finally that weekend I had had enough and, since he was being a jerk, I texted him for the name of a guy I liked who I met at a party we went to (kind of low, I know, but he deserved it). He replied that he didn't have the guy's contact info (so sure) and asked why, exactly, I wanted his info. Umm, because you've been blowing me off..?! Finally, I got an email later that weekend where he said that, since it seems as if I wasn't interested anymore, it's best we move on. You were the one not interested any more, jerk, not me! The email was kind of confusing and I thought there was still hope, and he was like, look, I'm sorry it didn't work out, and that was it. Then he had the nerve to email me a couple months later when I reposted my profile on a dating web site to say hello. I wasn't going to reply but told him what I thought of his cowardly way of breaking up with me. Not even a phone call!
Please, guys, do not do the slow fade. It really is disrespectful, confusing, hurtful, and degrading. If he could have just called me and said, "hey, I'm dating someone else, sorry" (which I know is what happened), my respect for him would be 100 times what it is now - which is zero.
Reply
Wednesday 09 December
By ek
Funny...the guy who asked me to check this out started to do the slow fade on one of my friends. He canceled a date at the last minute and she packed up his shit and left it in a brown bag on his doorstep (awesome). Now they're married.
I'm a pretty direct person and I just went through a breakup without any sugar coating and it was brutal. Can't there be something in between harsh words and games?
Reply
Wednesday 09 December
By dcbowl
so as it turns out i had the slow fade happen to me twice by the same girl. both times it started out by 'our' work schedules conflicting. then on days we were able to be together plans changed for her due to her bipolar friend her family or getting called into work. when we did get to go on a date it was terrible. it progressed for so long because i am an 'understanding guy' but eventually i got sick of it and got into a fight resulting in a breakup. until now i thought that we had a connection but couldnt understand why we couldnt work out but now i realize that she was a manipulative bitch.
Reply
Thursday 10 December
By silverchalice
I think I'm in the midst of a slow fade. I've been in an LDR with a guy I met at the end of the summer. We've seen each other since. We used to email and/or text frequently, like several times a week ( neither one of us are phone people).. We've also seen other since we initially met.
Several weeks ago he said it would be nice if we could get together for New Year's. i booked a non-refundable ticket with an outrageously high change fee.
Contact from him diminished to once/week. After boldly telling him I think he's just not that into me, I got an email telling me they got a major project at work with a specific deadline that he shared with me. After that deadline, he's fairly sure he'll be laid off from his job.
it sucks. I wish he'd just be up front with me. I'd pay the change fee to book a flight back to spend the Christmas/New Year's holidays with my family.
Overall, I just wish folks would be honest with one another. While yes, it may hurt in the short term, we can more readily move on with our lives.
Reply
Thursday 10 December
By Hayley
Definitely a supporter of the slow fade, but it has to be an obvious, identifiable slow fade. Like, a tacit but understood break-up. And if someone calls you out on slow-fading, don't deny it and reassure them that you'll see them soon. (This has never happened to me... Right. Anyway.) Just fess up that you don't feel like dating.
That being said, if you think you are getting slow-faded, you probably are.
Reply
Friday 11 December
By Nurner
I have used the "Treaty of Versailles" in all of my break ups and now I am feeling guilty about it. You are so right in saying that it is the nice breakup that isn't. Is there really any good way to break up with someone?
Reply
Saturday 12 December
By Five Apples
There is a variation to The Slow Fade that works in a similar manner - one that I preferred as an inexperienced young man. I'm not sure that I know a formal name but maybe the author of this article can do some research and give us one in a follow up piece. In this break-up method the ultimate goal is to avoid being the bad guy who initiates the split, so you treat the other person like a doormat until they get so sick of you that THEY dump YOU. Unfortunately, there are at least two flaws with this program; 1) in an effort to not be the 'bad guy' for dumping the other person, you become the bad guy by purposely becoming an A-hole & 2) if the other person has even a smidge of insecurity, there is a chance that they will begin to work even harder to please you, trying to keep the relationship together.....which becomes an even bigger nightmare.
Best bet, do it like a band aid and don't look back. The other person will appreciate that more in the long run.
Reply
Monday 14 December
By kate
Having just come out of a long "serious, exclusive-relationship" with a man, who sort of pulled that, I have to comment that it is an absurd way to treat another person. I am left mystified. I would understand, "I am into this relationship anymore..I don't think I love you, or am in love..this is not quite working out.." but to talk about a future..to be possessive, to call daily, text all the time, make claims of love you..one and only's and deny any doubts...then to just cancel important plans, insult pride, and one day, literally vanish...without a word...without an explanation.....(and to later act pissed..as if I did the breaking up...because I had to be the one to actually say something...by e-mail of course..call screening of course..)
cruel to leave someone in a confused state.
Reply
Wednesday 23 December
By Tim
You completely overlooked the passive-aggressive dump, where you can't bear to hurt the other persons feelings so you make them dislike you somehow and eventually dump you. It's the worst, and I've done it too many times, but I just hate being the dumper, I'd rather be dumped.
Reply
Monday 18 January
By beck
this article was great, and the thing I most enjoyed about it was the humor and honesty with which the author faced an awkward issue.
and honestly the comments all yelling for his blood over the slow fade don't make me think less of him, they just make me think "wow, these people must have recently been on the receiving end of that and are just NOT letting it go."
let go of the bitterness.
first of all, the author specified in the first few sentences that he wasn't talking about a relationship. just a thing. just that nebulous pre-relationship unnamed thing that is sometimes fun and sometimes lame and really SHOULDN'T be all that invested. he didn't say dump your long-time girl/boyfriend by fading out on them.
in this context comments like, "I think we've outgrown each other" or "this isn't working anymore" just seem ridiculous to me. you haven't known each other long enough to outgrow anything. or really for anything to have even started "working" in any real or serious way. this is just someone you've spent some time with because you were attracted to them enough to think maybe you might want to get closer. oops, surprise, you were mistaken, it turns out there isn't anything there past that initial attraction that makes you want to dig in further.
at THIS point (once again, not in a serious relationship) in the dating scenario, all the slow fade is saying (i'm phrasing it like this because everyone keeps giving their translation of "what the fade is saying" as if it's Vulcan or something).... is that the person thinks you are mature enough and smart enough and, frankly, COOL enough to catch on quick and let go of something that really wasn't all that big a deal in the first place. they're saying "hey, this isn't something i'm interested in pursuing, and i think you are socially adept enough to read the subtext (because adults are supposed to not need EVERYTHING spelled out for them people), and i also think you are an interesting enough person that you have other options and this shouldn't be devastating to you."
that's it.
so please stop freaking out about how inhumane this is. yes it's lame. but any situation where someone is interested and someone else isn't....is lame. far and away from a situation we can all say we'd "rather hear the truth, straight to our face". i know i've been guilty of that statement. but that's crap. no one wants to hear that someone just doesn't like them, and NO ONE wants to say it. and it's pretty childish to not only consider yourself unable to pick up on others' hints, but to then force them to say cruel things they never wanted to.
i'm not saying it's the only way to break something off, but it's definitely not the worst, and if we all were as mellow as we pretend to be when we say "if he'd just been honest to my face, it would've been no harm no foul," then we all would've realized what was happening as soon as we felt the fade, shrugged, and moved on.
Reply
Wednesday 20 January
By M
Its really reallllllyyy cruel to disappear or fade on someone. I am having this happen to me right now and its making my life feel worthless and terrible, because i care about them. I hate that people are posting online how this is an ok thing to do. I can't believe people are so fucking terrible.
Reply
Friday 29 January
By vintage80s
beck... I completely agree with you! these blogs always end up off on the wrong tangent because people read into the article too much... or don't read it enough. I'm sitting here reading the comments saying to myself 'this is talking about a 'thing' not relationships people'. Though I get where people are coming from. I'm guilty of the slow fade for 'things' because, as you mentioned, we are adults and haven't invested much into it and should be able to understand the whole nuance of this without hand holding. When it comes to relationships however I'm more direct to show my respect for the other person.
Reply
Sunday 31 January
By esszet
The slow fade sucks, either way. I don't think the harsh and brutal truth needs to come out of the bag either, especially if we're just talking about a 'thing'... but there needs to be a middle ground between the cowardice on the one hand, and the brutality on the other.
I'm on the receiving end of the slowfade, and I have to say that it hurts tons. Not only are there the lame excuses, but people who want to use the slow fade have to realize that if the fade-ee is really into you, that they're going to interpret your 'busy-ness' as just that. They will hold out for you longer (while they wait until your schedule clears), and the ultimate break-up will on be so much longer, and so much more painful. This doesn't need to happen.
People, have a heart. Spare your date's feelings and just *tell them* that things aren't working out for you (even an e-mail is better than the slow fade!), but that you wish them all the best.
Reply
Thursday 04 February
By Liz
Slow fade is terrible. As mentioned by a poster. After 6 months or more, a bonding has occured. When the slow fade began happening to me I never thought it was happening. All I could think is that something happened to him. He got killed, suffered a crisis is depressed, embarrassed/ashamed to tell me something Finally heard from him, he had been seeing someone else. Told him I am happy for him, but that is was terrible having him disappear like that, that all we had to do was talk. Then he tells me he loves me etc. All very convoluted. I think the slow fade was used to avoid breaking up cos there was no real reason to, he just wanted this other woman. Eventually I told him to not contact me anymore. Spoke with him five months later to check in. Its really sad to me, the slow fade, in my case I believe it was employed cos he wanted to have sex with another woman and run away from our connection/closeness. Really broke my heart all the worry I had for him cos he was such a sweety and genuinely seemed to adore me and flourish me with love and affection. I am in my 40's and never had something like this happen before. Really rocked me.
Reply
Sunday 21 February
By Jennifer Fox
I hear something... wait....wait for it... oh.. it's meg ryan in that lil movie with hugh jackman...you know? When she says, "go away...go away..can you just go away?" Of course she was totally adorable saying that to him ...but I think we can apply this theatrical moment to this uhh... story. I suppose you could call this writing but I seriously think it is more of a statement . A statement that is so very very long that it will never cease to exist. A loner with problems who has a lot to say. He is a very good boy.....keep up the good uhh .... yes I've got it.... writing? LOL!
Reply
Tuesday 14 September
By kt
is it possible for someone to pull a slow-fade on a friendship?
Reply