We're not embarrassed to admit that we're a little lost when it comes to what's going on with health-care reform. There were those town halls, some bill was introduced, Obama was on Letterman, but from where we're standing, it just seems like a bunch of politicos littering their angry debates with buzzwords that have no meaning to us. To remedy this, we buckled down and did some research so we don't ever have to fake it again when everyone at the bar starts talking about the Blue Dogs, death panels and Obamacare. (What, that's not how your happy hour conversation goes?) Here's the Lemondrop 101 Health-Care Primer:
Buzzword: Public Option
What it means: Right now there are two ways to get health care: get private insurance through your employer or purchase it individually from a private company. The public option (which Obama advocates) would be the opportunity to opt in to a public insurance program sponsored by the government. If you choose this option over private insurance, it's basically like the government is your health-care provider; you'd still have all the regular pay co-pays, deductibles, premiums and other bells and whistles of "normal" insurance. Many private insurance companies, of course, don't want the extra competition a public option would create, and many Republicans oppose the fact that it could cost up to $1 trillion.
Buzzword: Single-Payer System
What it means: This dramatic option is truly government-run health care. For the purposes of Congress, single-payer would guarantee coverage for everyone, regardless of wealth or health risks. There are no co-pays, deductibles, or premiums. They do not, however, own the doctors, hospitals, or medical equipment -- those are still privately run. An example would be Medicare (or France). Those opposed to it point to the cost and necessary rise in taxes, plus concerns over the government's presence smack-dab in decisions about health.
Buzzword: Blue Dogs
Blue Dogs are a coalition of 52 fiscally conservative Democrats in the House of Representatives who want to reduce spending as much as possible across the board. When it comes to the health-care debate, the Blue Dogs have been garnering more attention these last couple of months because they are resisting President Obama's ambitious, pro-public option ideas on health care, citing the extremely high costs of an overhaul to the health-care system as the reason. Democratic leaders in the House and Senate are worried that they may not be able to pass health-care legislation without the support of all the Blue Dogs, which puts the Blue Dogs in a powerful position.
Buzzword: Price Tag
Health-care reform of any kind is going to be expensive. Obama and Congress have some ideas about how to finance that: Use money that would normally have been used for Medicare and Medicaid (which, of course, isn't popular with seniors and families who rely on Medicaid and Medicare); higher taxes on millionaires; taxes on the most expensive private health insurance plans; or fees on employers who don't provide coverage.
Buzzword: Compromises
Many Democrats in Congress, including Speaker Pelosi, have said they will not support any health-care bill that does not at least include a public option. Those on the left see a public option as a compromise from the more radical single-payer health-care system many support.
A government-run public option would compete with already existing private options. Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius has said that if a public option is not included in the bill, the White House would be open to having nonprofit cooperative options that would still create competition with private insurance companies to keep rates affordable. However, no one is really sure what the "co-op" option means, so it hasn't gained much popularity.
So what's next?
After an intense summer in Washington, a bill was finally proposed by Senator Max Baucus in mid-September. The bill, if passed, would spend $800 billion over the next decade to provide insurance to an additional 30 million people, either through Medicaid or through a new insurance market. However, the bill now faces a long uphill battle to get passed. So far, it's been debated for days in the Senate Finance Committee but has yet to make it to the full Senate. On Tuesday the Senate Finance Committee finally voted not to include a public option, but Democrats supporting the public option may look to President Obama to find a way to still pass the public option.












Comments:
Add a comment
Thursday 01 October
By mamabear22
thank you.. thank you for helping me understand this whole topic. I was to embarrassed to ask anyone about it.
Reply
Thursday 01 October
By Dana
thank you for breaking all this down to help us have a better understanding of what's going on.
Reply
Sunday 04 October
By Rebecca
Great overview - definitely helps to put all the pieces in place.
Reply
Monday 05 October
By Anil Petra
Republicans aren't just resisting the public option. (They are questioning whether it will do anything other than weaken and, ultimately, bury the private insurance industry.)
Republicans propose opening insurance to competition across state lines. Did you know that, unlike your banking and investments, food, consumer goods, nearly EVERYTHING on which you spend your income, you can only buy health insurance from a company in your own state? Our country was founded on principles of free competition and trade among the states -- and we even try to be relatively open to foreign trade -- but health insurance is closed to such competition. Republicans believe that opening up the private market to competition from *other* private companies is a much better plan than having the government "compete". Makes as much sense as opening domestic collective farms to reduce the price of food.
Republicans believe that taxes are too high, and that government has created far too many incentives to get healthcare via the workplace rather than an individual policy. An individual policy is YOURS, cannot be taken away, you don't lose it if you change jobs or cross state lines. Employers began "providing" health insurance (which you pay for by taking a lower salary) because they get a tax deduction for it, but individuals don't get the same tax deduction if they buy the same policy. Republicans propose to level the playing field, and also want new provisions to ensure "portability" if you want to change jobs or move across state lines.
The Obama sponsored plan will set a new VERY HIGH standard for what policies have to cover, no ifs ands or buts, and also limits the spread between premiums for the very young, middle aged and older (pre-Medicare) Americans. Early drafts said no more then 2-to-1 !!! That would mean that premiums for the young will rise dramatically. If you're under 35, you could see your insurance costs double or even quadruple.
If you decide not to carry insurance, the Obama sponsored plan assesses you a significant fine -- you could be out of pocket $5000 a year or more, and be at risk of criminal prosecution if you don't buy health insurance. There is no guarantee of what the premium will be, none whatsoever, but you will be legally obliged to pay it. Estimates by the Congressional Budget Office suggest that they could be 25% of total household after-tax income for most Americans under the Democrats' plans. That's a huge tax on all Americans, with a particular burden on younger people, who might buy a cheap high deductible plan in a private competitive marketplace.
The key here is that younger Americans are expected to carry older Americans by paying much higher rates than they would choose to pay in a free market. It's like Social Security, an inter-generational transfer where no money is set aside for the future.
Democrats oppose sensible malpractice reform, so doctors will continue to practice "defensive medicine", ordering tests, longer hospital stays and unnecessary procedures for fear of legal liability, while refusing sensible arrangements to share information with other doctors that could save your life.
Don't buy the rhetoric. Take a serious look at Republican alternatives. No, they won't pass this year, but if the Republicans take back Congress, and the American people serve a hefty slice of humble pie to President Obama, maybe we can see sensible reforms in the next Congress.
Reply