Guess what? It's Banned Books Week! Which in means in addition to encouraging you young folks to get out there and read something scandalous (here's a list if you need some ideas), we'd also like to reflect on the titles that should've made the cut. Without further adieu, our own personal list of books we'd ban if someone put us in charge:
1. "Eat, Pray, Love," by Elizabeth Gilbert. Glad you "found yourself" on your little spiritual journey, Liz, but it's hard not to feel, oh, a little annoyed that you had to do it while traveling to the most beautiful places in the world. What, no revelation settings in Detroit?
2. "The Game," by Neil Strauss. Heeeey dudes! If you can't pick up women to save your life, read this mess of an instruction novel which involves a "pick-up artist" named Mystery dishing advice that involves wearing boas and insulting the opposite sex. Woo-hoo!
3. "Twilight" series, by Stephenie Meyer. We know we might ruffle some feathers (or werewolf fur, for that matter) for saying this but c'mon, people. These books have nothing on the genius that is Harry Potter! The only good thing that came out of this series was Robert Pattinson. There, we said it.
4. "A Million Little Pieces," by James Frey. Nothing like writing a memoir that didn't actually happen. Ban.
5. "P.S. I Love You," by Cecelia Ahern. The movie wasn't that good, but if you can believe it, the book was even worse. Overrun with clichés, dull characters and just plain bad writing, we actually couldn't get through it. (Think the fact her dad was the Irish head of government had anything to do with this being published?)
6. "The Celestine Prophecy," by James Redfield. Mostly because every d-bag in art school we wish we hadn't dated was reading it.
7. Anything by Katie Price. Katie Price, or shall we call you "Jordan"? Shut up. You're not even a real celebrity worth one book, much less THREE. We guesstimate the amount of text you actually wrote on your own amounts to about ... five pages.
8. "I Hope They Serve Beer in Hell," by Tucker Max. Listen, the dude can write, no question about that. But we felt it necessary to include this book in the list for the sake of womankind.
9. "The Da Vinci Code," by Dan Brown. We know it's a bestseller and that you're rakin' in the Benjamins, Dan Brown. But your complicated treasure hunt novel that throws in religion and deciphering codes and numerical sequences ... we call bulls--t on how fast Robert Langdon figures it all out.
10. "Multiple Blessings," by Jon & Kate Gosselin. Listen, there are a lot of people out there unfit to be dishing parenting advice; these are just two. Plus, was the book necessary? Can't we just watch your show (or pick up a tabloid) for all the info we need?.
More from Around the Web:
If Celebrities Were The Animals They Look Like (Holy Taco)
Enough Already, With the Leggings! (Celebuzz)
6 Beloved TV Shows That Traumatized Cast Members For Life(Cracked) NSFW
A Brief Timeline of Lily Allen's Antics (Mog) NSFW












Comments:
Add a comment
Sunday 04 October
By A tad more literary mature than yourself
This is the worst article I have ever read. It lacks logic, maturity, and is the least organized piece of "opinion" that I have ever read. Let me just say that if you want to criticize something, don't sound like a complaining 3 year old when you do it. If you could back up your "opinions" with actual logic about how the content is unfit for children, then i will read it. Otherwise, don't even bother posting your childish nonsense and start writing like a mature adult.
For most of you that posted a response, you disgrace me. The point of this article is to ban books that the authors finds are unfit for children. The language used in the books is far better than what I see here. You yourselves are all absolutely terrible role models to the entire youth population.Your crude language and poor grammar is the reason children are so uneducated these days. Maybe if you all stopped writing this illogical fatuity, you could actually take the time to learn how to write properly organized opinion pieces and maybe even teach your children to do the same.
Reply
Sunday 04 October
By Jackie
I Hope They Serve Beer in Hell was hilarious! I'm a woman and I loved it. I got most of my female friends to read it too and they enjoyed it as well. Just because we are women doesn't mean we don't have a sense of humor. Twilight was dumb but once I started I had to finish them...its a sickness I have when it comes to books.
Reply
Sunday 04 October
By cstocks12883
While I find this list hilarious..the idea of banning books is most definitely in bad taste. We do have the freedom of speech, and for those of you arguing with this list, you too have the choice to NOT read it as well. We're all entitled to our opinions, the title is in bad taste, but it is her opinion nonetheless. As for people asking for the Bible to be burned...many people find solace, love, guidance, and purpose in it...much the same can be said for the Koran. Not to mention there are many parts of the Koran that are beautifully written(you would recognize this if you actually made a point to read it). The point is we live in a country not only that protects free speech but freedom of religion and it would be wise to remember that. While there are those who are overzealous in their interpretation and carrying out what they think the message of whatever religious book they follow, it is not the only reason people have either the Bible or the Koran in their life. We are a country of choice..and those two books are a part of that choice, banning ANY book then creates an open door to burn any book...be careful what you demand.
Reply
Sunday 04 October
By Sally
r u kidding me? sure, the others are okay, but Twilight is the 2nd best series in the world! there's nothing wrong with it!!!! and robert pattinson is the WORST- and i mean absolute worst- thing that came out of the Twilight series. Of course, nothing could ever top harry potter. Harry Potter is the best-written series in the history of the world! Twilight is the best romance book ever, New Moon was just terrible, Eclipse was really good, and breaking dawn was okay. Robert Pattinson is HIDEOUS!
Reply
Sunday 04 October
By srsnakes
How about the greatest bullshit story ever told? THE BIBLE. ( most bibles are printed on very porous paper though, so it's still good for wiping your ass with)
Reply
Sunday 04 October
By Sally
That's really offensive. Some of us happen to live off of the Bible, and I'm sorry you don't. No, I'm not a Jesus freak, I'm hardly even religious at all, but I find your opinon offensive and plain rude. If you're going to be against Christianity, I recommend you keep it to yourself and let the rest of us find eternity with God in peace.
Sunday 04 October
By srsnakes
Sally,not only am I against christianity, I'm against all superstitious beliefs. There's no difference between believing in an invisible god and believing in the Easter Bunny. You people are insane and dangerous.
Reply
Monday 05 October
By Scarlett
Your screen name indicates you do believe in religion. Perhaps you should READ the bible before you form your opinion, and a bit of Churh and religion might help you. Someday, you will be praying to God to help you, and he may just ignore you. You sound very young and very stupid. If you are a grown person, then the latter should be applied.
Thursday 08 October
By Rachel
I would pay to have Twilight banned. Let's start a petition.
Reply
Monday 05 October
By Mallory
Sarah, we don't want to ban Twilight because there's gay people in it and we don't want to ban the Da Vinci Code because it's religious. I happened to enjoy the Da Vinci Code, but it was sort of BS how fast he figured it out.
Also? Twilight just sucks. I agree with the author of this article. It's too sappy, too stupid, too anti-woman, and most importantly it took the entire mythological bases of Vampirism and left them in a ditch to die.
PS Before you knock someone maybe you should learn some basic GRAMMAR.
Reply
Sunday 04 October
By Kathy Zimmerman
I'm a librarian. Banning books isn't something to joke about, it's really done and for ridiculous reasons. Do you know that The Diary of Anne Frank has been banned because of how she describes changes in her body as she develops as a teen-ager? Harry Potter because people think it's about witchcraft? And they take it seriously? Tom Sawyer and To Kill a Mockingbird because of historically correct English (the use of the n-word). I'm familiar with all of the books on this list. I've actually read a couple of them. While none of them are great literature, none of them should be banned. Each in its own way was relatively popular and I'm for anything that gets people reading.
Reply
Sunday 04 October
By Kariann
I think you forgot that before Twilight, Robert Pattinson starred in Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire as Hufflepuff Champion Cedric Diggory....
So there's another way HP trumphs Twilight!
Reply
Sunday 04 October
By musikfanat
BANNING BOOKS, EH? YOU'LL BE BURNING THEM NEXT AND THEN BURNNG PEOPLE. OH, DIDN'T THAT HAPPEN A LITTLE WHILE AGO?
REMEMBER NAZI GERMANY???
Reply
Sunday 04 October
By Melissa
Wow Andrea, way to take us about a giant leap right into "1984" by George Orwell...
"it is set in the eponymous year and focuses on a repressive, totalitarian regime."
Or better yet, "Fahrenheit 451" by Ray Bradbury
"The novel presents a future American society in which the masses are hedonistic, and critical thought through reading is outlawed..."
We live in a country where we have freedom of the press and everything written in our constitution... and yet people still burn and ban books based on personal opinions not held by all... What does that tell you?
Reply
Sunday 04 October
By Ledora Tighe
Sorry to be a purist Meg - but it's "Mein Kampf" How old are you?
Reply
Sunday 04 October
By Kate
Who the heck is Andrea Zimmerman why on earth should ANYONE take her advice on books that should be banned? Is she the Official Book Police captain? If you want to pick on books, there are LOTS of stupid, idiotic, boring, ridiculous, and worthless books to choose from. While the 'Twilight' series is juvenile and changes all the vampire rules we all know, it was written for juveniles. It's not supposed to be intricate or sophisticated. Dan Brown seems to be doing just fine with his 'treasure hunt' type stories and Robert Langdon character. No one cares how the Gosselins are raising their children because their marriage has replaced that story line. Leave their attempts at writing a book to their publishers. Ms. Zimmerman needs something to do with all her spare time, apparently.
Reply
Sunday 04 October
By Dawn
This is America people. No books should banned. If you don't like the topic of the book DON'T read it! I don't want my freedom to read any book taken away. Come on people what's next?
Reply
Sunday 04 October
By ira
i definitely agree with the twilight one.. so bland so shallow and they dare compare themself to harry potter?? puhleaseeeeeeee
Reply
Sunday 04 October
By Ledora Tighe
You - SRSNAKES - are a frightening individual! I pity your soul and I am not a bible-thumper just a believer.
Reply
Sunday 04 October
By tazarinie
the one sentence says it! , books we would ban if we were in charge. Thank heaven these people aren't in charge because everyone has their own likes and dislikes. I just loved the Twilight series but couldn't read Harry potter if someone paid me. So we all have our own opinion on what is good. If we all had a shot at banning 10 books, how many do you think would actually make it to the public???
Reply