Congress is back in session this week, and that means that the debate over health-care reform will only get uglier. From here on out, we'll be hearing a steady drumbeat from right-wing pundits and their mainstream media enablers: abortion abortion abortion. Second only to lies about "death panels," abortion scare tactics are a favorite of universal-health-care opponents. But if you, like a majority of Americans, find abortion icky, then you should be an eager supporter of universal health care for two major reasons.
1. Taxpayers Won't Be Paying for Abortions
Despite what conservative activists claim, taxpayer money will not fund abortions. The Hyde Amendment specifically forbids the use of federal money to pay for elective abortion, and there's no reason to think health-care reform will change that.
Some conservatives argue that under health-care reform, insurance companies that already cover abortion will continue to do so, even though they're in a federal system. And under the proposed public option, it would be legal to cover abortion because the public option will be paid for -- like all insurance companies are -- by members.
Click here for more.
None of this means that abortion will be paid for with tax dollars. If you really don't want to pay for abortion with your insurance premiums, you can choose one of the insurance companies that don't cover it. But I'll bet that most people gnashing their teeth over this don't even know whether their own insurance company covers abortion.
Universal Health Coverage Will Lower the Abortion Rate
If you're anti-abortion, then you want fewer of them, right? Universal health coverage would most likely lower the abortion rate. Western European nations (and Canada) that conservatives claim have "socialized medicine" also have a much lower abortion rate than the U.S. America has 21.3 abortions per 1,000 people. Contrast that with England (15.6 per 1,000), Canada (16.4 per 1,000), Germany (7.6 per 1,000) and Holland (6.5 per 1,000). What do they have that we don't? Universal health care.
It makes sense if you think about it. The number one cause of abortion is unintended pregnancy. The best way to prevent unintended pregnancy is contraception. And the most reliable forms of contraception -- IUDs, sterilization and hormonal contraception -- require putting you in front of a doctor. Universal health care makes that much easier, which in turn reduces the unwanted pregnancy rate.
It isn't just contraception, of course. Many women who get pregnant by accident consider keeping the baby, but for those who don't have health insurance, that's a (dangerous) pipe dream. Universal health care could reduce the abortion rate coming and going.
Anti-Abortion but Pro-Sex?
Of course, if what you object to isn't abortion so much as sex, mostly likely the premarital kind, then I suppose these arguments mean nothing to you. And that's why the organized anti-choice movement opposes universal health care.
Most to all anti-abortion organizations object to contraception use, sex education and other methods to reduce the abortion rate, because they believe these things make it easier to have sex without consequences. Given a choice between punishing sex and reducing the number of abortions, the anti-choice movement will choose the former every time.
But you don't have to. If you genuinely have no problem with sex, but don't like abortion, then there's only one choice for you: Support universal health care. Because without it, we're stuck with a high abortion rate.
Amanda Marcotte is the author of "It's a Jungle Out There" and writes about politics daily at Pandagon.net.












Comments:
Add a comment
Wednesday 09 September
By Kate
I'm fine with "anti-abortion" but "anti-choice" is such an unfair term for those that oppose abortion.
Reply
Saturday 12 September
By jan
The term 'anti-choice' is precisely correct. It is what it is...against the right of choice. 'Pro-choice' is ALSO 'Pro-life.' Pro-choice people also believe in the 'life' issue...especially after a human being comes into this world. That is when LIFE, and the quality of that individual's LIFE becomes a life journey. There is nothing unfair about the term anti-choice. What is unfair is that others who do not support 'choice' and 'privacy' try to push their perspectives into law for everyone else. Don't want an abortion? Simple. Don't have one.
Wednesday 09 September
By Amanda Marcotte
Anti-choice is an accurate term for people who want to ban abortion. You can be pro-choice but against abortion for yourself. I have no problem with that. But the second you want to ban it or make it harder for women to get elective abortions, you aren't just anti-abortion. You're anti-choice. You don't want others to have a choice. See the difference? Anti-choice is more accurate in some cases than anti-abortion, since a lot of people who don't feel right having abortions believe others should have the right to their own beliefs.
Reply
Friday 11 September
By Becca
OK! YA I understand that we have a right ro say yes or no to something. But what about that baby growing inside that woman!!! If you don't want a chaild there are so many differnt ways to pervent it, RIGHT!! I feel so damn bad for every child that has to feel the pain of a abortion...did anyone think of that!!!!??? Really think about how you'd feel if your being burnt or pilled apart! YOur body then rap it. Get your tubs tide OMG!!!!
Now I understand that if the baby is going to die or the mother for sure-HEALTH RELATED- YA because your HOPEFULLY saveing a life not killin one. Adoption People My GOD.
Monday 14 September
By harude91
What about the baby? You aren't giving it a chance or a choice for life.
Sunday 27 September
By Mason
If a person want to get rid of an unborn child they need to pay for every thing it takes. Noone else should pau for it. No freebee in life.
Thursday 10 September
By e
This was beautifully articulated. Easy and affordable access to health care, including reproductive care can make all the difference. Giving women and families the ability to take charge and responsibility for all areas of their health and family can really only benefit this country. In some areas, like where Planned Parenthood (an incredible organization) are prevalent and vocal, that access is easier and more avaliable than in others. Nobody hears about the pregnancies that DON'T happen, and 90% of the work they do is preventative, not reactionary. Spreading this to all doctors, not just specialty clinics, can only make is easier and more comfortable for women to get the information, options and treatment needed to take the best care, and make the best decisions for them selves.
Reply
Thursday 10 September
By Limited GOV.
Giving Government the ability to take charge and responsibility for all areas of your health and family can really only enslave this country. In some areas, like where Planned Parenthood exists !!! Prison in your own house!
Thursday 10 September
By Ed
Elective abortion should not be covered under a public option universal insurance program. A woman should have the right to "murder" her unborn child if she can live with that the rest of her life up to the point that the unborn child has a right to life. At this point in the debate, that appears to be the last tri-mester. So go for it. It is your child.
Reply
Thursday 10 September
By ead504
Amanda Marcotte, while "anti-choice" may be an accurate term for those who wish to ban abortion, I think Kate is right that is an unfair term, or at least unwise. Many people in the pro-life/anti-abortion movement view abortion as murder, and from that perspective, referring to abortion as a "choice" is horribly dismissive. Calling pro-choicers who are looking out for the welfare of society and the dignity of women "anti-life" would be considered unfair, so why not the other way around? Furthermore, the term rejects the myriad of non-abortion choices available, including those you rightly highlight as benefits of universal health care.
Your use of the term "anti-choice" gives this article a faint tone of disdain, which could cause embattled pro-lifers to overlook your well-reasoned points.
As a pro-lifer who does embrace the view of sex as being for unitive and procreative purposes within marriage, I still find it disapppointing that so much energy of the pro-life movement is spent working against contraceptives and sex education. I would like the world to agree with my view of sex, because I think it would be a better place for it. HOWEVER, I think the priority needs to be reducing abortions and taking care of pregnant women and unwanted children who are born. I support the rights of people to make the choices they wish in regards to religious and sexual practices; it is only the choice to dispose of innocent life that I oppose.
Thank you for a well-thought out argument and thanks to you, Kate and e for respectful comments.
Reply
Friday 11 September
By Michael Roy
Well said, ead504. You saved me typing a lot of words.
Cheers
Friday 11 September
By Becca
"is only the choice to dispose of innocent life that I oppose." This is how I feel- I to don't undersatnd why they don't push safe sex more?? I was 16 whe i found out I was havong a child I was scared and happy all at the same time but when I went to the doctors the first question I wqas asked was- Do you want an ABORTION? Heck no I said ya I'm young but it was me who said yes to sax not this child and if i didn't want this baby I'd do adoption not that- We walked out and went somewhere else. That should not be the first Q. someone is asked, it's just stupid. How does any of us push the safe sex matter or no sex or adoption more then the easy why out???
Thursday 10 September
By Amanda Marcotte
They may want to equate 40% of American women who have abortions with murderers, or imply that having sex is the same thing as murder. But that doesn't mean I have to respect them, or their misogyny.
Anti-choice is accurate. It describes your actual political position: You wish to deny women the choice. I'm more interested in accuracy than protecting the fee-fees of people who want to deny me basic rights because I'm a woman.
Reply
Thursday 10 September
By ShayShayBu
Once again, very poor reporting. It is obviously biased. Abortion is a beautiful thing. Anyone who ACTUALLY tries to OPPOSE the beautiful choice of a strong, independent woman who wants to terminate the pregnancy is disgusting.
Reply
Friday 11 September
By Felicia
ShayShayBu: Abortion is a beautiful thing? Are you sick? I suppose you think war is a beautiful thing too? The look on my face right now, absolute disgust. There are no words to discribe your stupidity. Ending a life is NEVER beautiful.
Sex is a beautiful thing, and when PROTECTED PROPERLY, does not lead to pregnancy! Take a pill! Use the patch! Use a condom! Get the shot! Why is this all SO FN HARD for people to understand???? PROTECT YOURSELF FROM GETTING PREGNANT AND YOU WON'T NEED A DAMN ABORTION!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
It is pathetic that Americans now use abortion AS birth control. Birth control starts BEFORE conception. Before the sperm meets the egg. Prevent the sperm from reaching the egg, prevent the "need" for abortion.
America needs a GOOD sex education system. Stop pushing abstinence. Abstinence teaching does not work because if our youth (yes, I say youth while I am but 21 myself) were educated on how to use a condom or other control methods, told where to find them, and how CHEAP they are...all this craziness would be stopped!!
Prevent pregnancy and prevent abortions. Easy as that. I don't give a rat's ass about your right to "choose". You COULD have chosen to protect yourself and you COULD have stopped yourself from getting pregnant in th first place. But more often than not, you are either too immature, ignorant (mostly by the fault of your parents, educators and doctors), or irresponsible to protect yourself.
But go ahead. Get that abortion. Let your doctor put that 10 inch turkey baster into your abdomen and inject your uterus with salt water!! I'm sure it's perfectly fine for your body to be poisoned with salt! Not to mention, the terrible MENTAL side effects you will have!
Remember when you were younger (or not too long ago for most) when you picked out names for your children? You decided that _____ would be the name for your first girl? Now fast forward to 10 years down the road, when you have a husband and a son. Do you ever wonder what happened to _____? Why did you never conceive a daughter? Oh wait! You did! You KILLED her!!
Monday 14 September
By harude91
ShayShayBu, truly in your best interest, seek help. Murder is not a "beautiful" thing, I am truly saddened to read such a comment. Life should be protected at all stages no matter how small. The degradation of morals and thoughts in this country is despicable. I will pray for you.
Thursday 10 September
By Amanda Marcotte
Well, I certainly never said abortion was the right choice for every pregnancy! That's just silly. Many pregnancies are wanted and anticipated eagerly, and I'm so glad those women have the choice to have their babies. And I'm glad that women who can't be happy and eager to have a baby have a choice not to. See? It's about choice, and the right to make one. It's also about loving families and children, and wanting what's best for them, and what's best is that children be greeted with open, welcoming arms, not forced on women by law as punishment.
Reply
Thursday 10 September
By R.
The way I see-
1.It is NOT your body
2.It's NOT your right to dictate how I live my life.
I have had an abortion myself, if you don't like it, DON'T have one.
it's as simple as that.
Reply
Friday 11 September
By Kate
I do think women should have the right to choose what they do with their bodies- until their right interferes with the right of another human's body. Abortion interferes with the human fetus's right to live.
Reply
Friday 11 September
By Kate
The point of my last comment was to explain why anti-abortion does not equal anti-choice. I am all about making choices for myself.
Reply