If finding respite from the criticism of her detractors was Sarah Palin's goal when she resigned as governor of Alaska on July 26, she failed miserably. At Salon.com this week, Juan Cole wrote an entire column comparing Palin to Iran's Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. Not only are Palin's political ideology and aspirations still being scrutinized, but her personal life is as well. (The rumor of an impending Palin divorce, although it has been officially denied, remains a hot topic of discussion.)
Regardless of whether or not she ultimately decides to run for the office, as long as Palin is polling well against other Republicans she will be treated as a presidential hopeful. I understand that. What is not so easy to understand is the intense hatred for Palin and the nature of some of the criticism aimed at her -- especially that coming from self-described feminists.
A Narrow Feminism
The dictionary definition of the word "feminism" as a "doctrine advocating social, political, and all other rights of women equal to those of men," has not always matched the widespread understanding of the word by the general public.
Over the past few decades, feminism has come to be associated with a more narrow liberal agenda with groups like the National Organization for Women claiming to speak on behalf of women in America. Issues such as abortion rights and ending sex discrimination in the workplace have been at the forefront of the movement.
Click here for more on Palin and the feminist agenda after the jump.
And that's certainly true of the feminist party line on Palin. Rather than celebrating the nomination of Palin as the first woman GOP vice-presidential candidate, self-described feminists have been some of her harshest critics -- most likely because she did not fit their stereotype of what a feminist is. Some even argued it was impossible to be a social conservative and a feminist.
Much of the early criticism of Palin focused on her decision to work while being a mom with five children. Oddly, now that she has resigned as governor she is being criticized by some of the same people for quitting her job.
The Pro-Life Problem
Many of the so-called feminists who attack Palin cite her pro-life position. They claim to be speaking for the majority of American women. But in May, Gallup found for the first time in nine years of their values survey that more women identified themselves as pro-life than pro-choice.
Antiquated notions of feminism deny the reality, and diversity, of women today. Believe it or not, there are conservative women who find it possible (thanks in part to technology and greater workplace flexibility) to have successful careers and families.
Today's women, both liberal and conservative, choose to hold their own opinions on issues, and to elect people who share those opinions. They want fair treatment of those women running for public office, even when those candidates -- like Palin -- don't adhere to a liberal agenda. That's a concept any feminist should grasp.
Lorie Byrd has been political blogging since 2004. Read more from her at Wizbangblog, Townhall.com and American Issues Project.org.
More hot topics around the Web:
Cash for Clunkers -- sound like you know what you're talking about (Lemondrop)
Obama and racism's role in the Pittsburgh gym shootings (BlogHer)
Should pro-lifers be pro-birth control? (Double X)




















Comments:
Add a comment
Thursday 06 August
By Lily
Why should feminists support Palin? Just because she's a woman? You didn't really make any argument in there, you just said that feminists are wrong for calling her out on her incompetence. I felt ashamed when Palin made her little 'glass ceiling' speech, because I know that Palin didn't EARN her position as VP. If she was a man, there's no way she would have been chosen. She was a young beauty queen with appeal to 'middle america'. It wasn't about her qualifications, which were VERY few. It was about winning the popularity contest in the election. That's not something to be proud of, that's not something that appeals to the feminist in me at all. And as for the pro-life/pro-choice debate, just because a majority believes in something doesn't make it right. That point has been made time and time again in our history. There were a good number of women who didn't think it appropriate for women to be able to vote.
Reply
Thursday 06 August
By Bibliophile Feminist
Phenomenally well summed up, thank you Lily.
Saturday 16 January
By April
--Why should feminists support Palin? Just because she's a woman?--
The article did not say for feminists to support Palin (although any true feminist would). It was stating how they distorted feminism into their version of it and, since Palin didn't fit it and yet was the first female VP candidate, they attacked her. It wasn't because she is a woman; it was because she is a Republican woman. I used to be a Republican and know the situation personally.
...If you are going to reply to something; at least take the time to read it, not skim it and fill the gaps in with your interpretation.
--You didn't really make any argument in there, you just said that feminists are wrong for calling her out on her incompetence.--
If what kim said was true, you obviously do not understand the definition of "incompetence". Obama is the epitome of neutral and harmful mutations in politics. Writing "present" on every vote does not say responsible or competent and lying about erasing party-lines shows a person who is neither trustworthy nor unbiased. I mean, come on, not even one third-party person appointed? All Democrats? You're kidding!
--I felt ashamed when Palin made her little 'glass ceiling' speech, because I know that Palin didn't EARN her position as VP. If she was a man, there's no way she would have been chosen. She was a young beauty queen with appeal to 'middle america'.--
You just know everything, don't you? Obama did not EARN his position, but, because he LOOKED black, he was voted for.
-- It wasn't about her qualifications, which were VERY few.--
You can't stop taking shots, can you? She has more executive years than his insignificant few AND she was not afraid to call out others in her party that were doing wrong, which he doesn't have the spine for, let alone to stand up for our country in interviews with those in other nations. She was more qualified than McCain, Obama, Biden and many (NOT all) third-party candidates.
--It was about winning the popularity contest in the election. That's not something to be proud of, that's not something that appeals to the feminist in me at all.--
Many elections have been popularity contests. The only way to fix that is to fix the voting system into a consensus (not unanimous) voting system, so we're not stuck between choosing Bad and Worse.
--And as for the pro-life/pro-choice debate, just because a majority believes in something doesn't make it right. That point has been made time and time again in our history. There were a good number of women who didn't think it appropriate for women to be able to vote.--
Do you look through a screen when you read? The pro-life/pro-abortion survey was brought up to show how many self-proclaimed feminists think that they represent the viewpoints of women, when in fact it was the opposite. In other words, it was pointing out their mishap, or rather lie.
When these women actually become about choice and vote for libertarian tendencies (instead of populist, since by your own words "majority...doesn't make it right") in the federal elections, then I'd see fit to call them on the way to feminism.
Have a nice day.
Thursday 06 August
By Ray Abbott
You're absolutely right Lily. It wasn't about qualifications. Look at the jerk we have now for VP. (And I have lived in Delaware all my life.) He's an embarressment to the great country we were. But that's OK. Now that we have the BBs (Bama & Biden) no one respects us any more. Matter of fact, we don't even respect ourselves anymore. We're too busy looking for free rides.
Thursday 06 August
By Palin Supporter
You need to go out and research and get your facts straight because if you did then you would know her qualifications are very high. and she was selected for the gop ticket not because she was a woman but because he needed the strong conservative vote. I don't think you know anything,do you?
Friday 07 August
By JD
The author did not claim that criticizing Palin was wrong. Unfair criticism is wrong, and I agree with that. You can't criticize Gov. Palin for being a working mother, and then criticize her when she quits? Also, the author makes a great point - feminism meant that women could work, and be mothers and wifes. Sarah Palin defines that goal and life exactly - and has been very successful. Those of you who criticize her - how many of you have accomplished half as much as she?
It seems to me that you wish to define feminism as the right to abortion. Seems like a very sad, and limiting definition to me.
Friday 07 August
By Katrinka
quoting Lily "There were a good number of women who didn't think it appropriate for women to be able to vote. "
and your obvious bias certainly proves that argument===that (some) women shouldn't be permitted to vote.
Friday 07 August
By Master Chief
Lily, I really don't understand your point in talking about Sarah's "qualifications" when the majority of American recently voted someone even LESS qualified, to the position of US President.
If Obama, who in reality is an imbecile, can become president, I'm sure Sarah can achieve similar results. I mean, her ability of speaking, without having to read from a teleprompter, is enough to put her ahead of this charlatan who is currently screwing up whatever is left of the US and its economy..
Friday 07 August
By justin
"because I know that Palin didn't EARN her position as VP. If she was a man, there's no way she would have been chosen. She was a young beauty queen with appeal to 'middle america'. It wasn't about her qualifications, which were VERY few. It was about winning the popularity contest in the election."
So why did Barack win? ohh becasue he was a black man running for president. If he was a white male.. he would not have won.
Monday 24 August
By Sensible Thinking
Sadly, you sound just like the bitter, hateful women that that author is talking about....and your bitterness has caused you to miss the point. Unjust or unfair criticism is what the issue is (about).
Friday 07 August
By susanna
What qualifications does Obama have please tell me.I do not want to hear he was a United States Senator as he was only one since 2005 and I believe in 07 started to campaign for president so missed nearly two years of his seat.Lets also be honest as a feminist you do not choose who you want to honor and who you don't let me tell you something lily that ceiling speech was wonderful you needed to protest for her because she is a woman and she did earn her spot there got it if not get it.As a feminist we protect all womans rights not who we choose to because some we don't like if you feel she was not ready you just don't vote for her you do not knock her down this is why men do it because idiots like you do it all women need to stick together until we do we wil never ever reach that ceiling.So be proud of your Obama the same man who now is asking for all names and numbers emails of those who do not support his health care plan the same one who says if you want to qualify for this clonckers program you must agree the united states goverment may search your computers and records anytime they want .
Sunday 23 August
By David
SO using your logic, since a majority seem to have the opinion and belief that women DO have the right to vote, perhaps that doesn't make it right either. Maybe we do need to go back to pre-1920 times....doesn't the logic of your argument follow here? And forget all that "Civil Rights" stuff that most people are in line with now....it's not the right thing just because most people think it is, right Lily?
Perception often is seen as reality no matter which side or gender is giving it, in case you didn't learn that in your women's studies courses. The "feminists" do not as a whole support conservative viewpoints, at least in a public manner. What their leadership and spokespersons put out there is a narrower agenda, and that is what sells to the public. SO don't get all offended when you folks are called out on it. Just man up (oops, I mean, woman up), admit it, and own up to your beliefs. You will be respected, at least for being honest about it.
Sunday 23 August
By Lily
I had no idea I was stepping on a bees nest of political idolatry. I honestly thought this was some amateur blogger's ignored article when I made my comment, since no one else had commented and I came across it via StumbleUpon. I've read through all the responses and have this to say:
To all the people saying that Obama is less qualified, he's no messiah, nor is he a bumbling unqualified idiot.
BA in Political Science at Columbia
JD magna cum laude from Harvard Law School
Thesis written on Soviet Nuclear Disarmament (this was the late 80's)
President of the Harvard Law Review
Senator of Illinois, 8 years
Chair of the Senate Foreign Relations Subcommittee on European Affairs
Member of:
Senate Foreign Relations Committee
Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions
Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs
Senate Committee on Veterans' Affairs
Now, here are Sarah Palin's qualifications:
Governor of Alaska, 2 years
BS in Journalism from the University of Idaho, after 6 years.
Chair of the Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission, 1 year
Wasilla City Council
Mayor of Wasilla
Miss Wasilla beauty pageant queen
Miss Alaska 'Miss Congeniality' winner
Give me a break. Honestly, how can you compare those two lists and say Palin's more qualified? I'm digressing, that's just an absurd debate to have.
To all the people saying that Sarah Palin represents a feminist ideal, list off her qualifications again for me. Governor of Alaska? What else? What other concrete positions has she held? And she's being considered for the second highest position in the US Government, when one of her biggest qualifications is beauty queen? What does that say about how the people who chose her viewed her, as a foil to McCain's old and uncharismatic image?
Now search the internet for the picture of her wearing a shirt saying "I may be broke but, I'm not flat busted". This is a woman who is okay with the objectification of other women, being a beauty pageant queen. She is in support of creationism being taught in schools, which essentially states that women are less than men as they were created just from a man's rib bone and designed to be subservient to him. She is against all forms of contraceptives, which has clearly worked out well for her own children. Yes, she has some feminist traits in her personality, but she hasn't shown herself to be in any way supportive of women's rights.
Now, those of you who are insistent that I should be ashamed of myself for my beliefs, I want you to know that that is impossible for me because I actually research them before I establish them. I can't be ashamed of something that I know to be well-supported.
Saturday 29 August
By BillMorini
I happen to be a fan of Sarah Palin. I'm not sure I want her to be the GOP candidate, in '12, but I think she's a great role model for girls, women, moms, etc. She comes from very middle class routes & she did earn her own college degree. She didn't go to school on anyone else's dime. She didn't like what was going on in her school district, so she got involved with the PTA. She didn't like what was going on in her town, so she got involved, ran for mayor, & won. Eventually, she ended up governor of AK. That's the way people got involved, in the government, from the foundation of this nation. She has impeccable integrity, too. No matter how hard the dimocrats tried to find dirt on her (& they tried really hard), they couldn't. Feminist should hail any woman who is successful in any field, even if she doesn't share their ideology or political agenda. The liberal feminist exposed themselves. They're not for women. They're for a social mandate. As for her qualifications to be VP? She certainly wasn't the most experienced candidate, but a comparison of resumes & achievements would reveal the she wasn't the least qualified, either.
Thursday 06 August
By kim
OH LILY, YOU SPEAK OF QUALIFICATIONS, WELL OBAMA DIDNT HAVE ANY TO SPEAK OF!! WHAT HAS OBAMA DONE FOR THE AMERICAN PEOPLE ?? ID PUT PALIN UP AGAINST THIS UNQUALIFIED JERK ANY DAY, SHE AT LEAST CARES ABOUT AMERICA AND WOULDNT BE TAKING US DOWN THE PATH OF DESTRUCTION ON PURPOUS!!
Reply
Thursday 06 August
By Cara
Wow, Kim... you need to get your unfettered conservative anger in check. Palin isn't qualified to work at a Dairy Queen. I won't list Obama's qualifications because they're well known and documented. I am ashamed, as a woman, of Sarah Palin. She embodies everything most intelligent women are against and she would set us back years with her ridiculous, rambling hyperbole.
And, by the way, it's 'purpose', not 'purpous'. I rest my case.
Friday 07 August
By Katrinka
Your criticism of a typo is as ridiculous as your undocumented statement that " I won't list Obama's qualifications because they're well known and documented." Name ONE qualification , outside of being a "community organizer" which he still hasn't grown out of.
I can list several:
1.During the campaign he stated that he hadn't yet campaigned in all 57 states. (duh)
2. He apologized for not knowing the "Austrian" language. double duh--they speak German--there IS no "Austrian" language
3. He gave CDs and DvDs to Queen Elizabeth--when anyone with a modicum of intelligence knows that the European system is totally different from the American system--thus a total waste of a gift (and a cheap, low-class one at that)
So if Sarah Palin isn't "qualified to work at Dairy Queen", Obama isn't qualified to be a dishwashe there, And indubitably, neither would you.
Friday 07 August
By MITFORD VIJAY
Kim,it's difficult to deal with misfit morans like Lily and all those other misaligned liberals and other godless fafoons as Cara,Yokoach,Lizardlip
and likes,when The Radiance of Sarah Palin is mentioned,for the loathing
liberals are simply jealous of Her,in all what she stands for as a Christian
Conserative.All what Sara Palin stands for and believes is a slap and kick in
the face of godless-liberals,so their typical leftist-hate and unjustifiable
accusations are the reflection of their degrading blind-minds and prevaling
slime-thoughts.They have no reason to cast their low-life accusations on Sarah
Palin,yet at the same time those lost liberals are either outright ignorant or
willfully deceived when it comes to the biggest crook,fraud and phony-islamist,
marxist,acorn thug and rat in the White House:Obama,whom they worship.
They are blind,deaft and dumb for 'their' leader,who with his thugs in
Congress and Senate are breaking every Constitutional Law and getting-away.
And along with the liberal owned(ABC-All Barak'sCorruption),NBC,MSNBC,
CNN,main stream deceits,the rat in the White House has easly got away.
They polished-up ,repainted and repackage islamist low-lifeObama from the
start with all such blamaspheming terms as The Messiah,and The Chosen
One,but like the blind following the blind,they don't even see they are heading
for the ditch.The whole issue about the thug- Obama,lies around his covered-
up Birth Certificate,which is 'honesty' .So he lies,cheats and steals continually
and no one holds him to such crimes.In his Book -Dreams Of My Father,it's
total lies,for his father was a pedophile,already with 4 wives in Africa,before
he escaped The British Army,where he & his racist marxist islamist tribe were
conducting a killing campaign against Christians in Kenya,which in fact still goes on.After escaping to Hawaii,he met a street thing-Durman,no doubt to
get Residence.What sane,decent and moral-upright woman would marry a
dirth-bag with already 4 illegimate wives?By law Obama is illegimate.From there it gets worse,but only returned to Kenya after The British left.What corrupt Obama has for America is what his damned islamist,communist,marxist father has implemented in Zimbabwe,which those thugs have used to starve,kill and enslave the people today.
Do liberals really know that the brazen thief-Obama along with Bill Ayers
had stolen hundreds of millions of dollars from The Anenberg Trust fund,
along with $300 million foreign islamist terrorist contributions,which names
are deleted?This is only half of his theft,so cleaverly covered-up,along with
hundreds of thousands of American Tax dollars from Fannie may and Freddy
mac,before election,and no one talks about it all.This is similar to Madoff big
theft,who in contrast to Obama was caught.
The enemies constantly talk of Sarah Education and how she did'nt pass
Katie Couric test.Well how much do they do of Katie Couric?The Truth is
Katie Couric is a pervert....I repeat a pervert who is a rat in the closet.That
degenerate rat has no morals,that's why sick Couric along with ABC satanically
set-up a trap for Sarah and they laughed their sick-heads off.Dirtbags like Couric and gobbledegook Gibson are payed-off to put Christian Conservatives
in a dismal-light.Talking of Education,the pervert Katie Couric does'nt even
know what is The definition of Marriage,but that thing has her own twisted
make-up definition instead.When a person does'nt even know what's the True
definition of Marriage,what the hell does she know?And who cares what the
pervert-Couric reads?
The Truth cuts sharper than a knife!
MV
today
Thursday 06 August
By W Boykin Jr.
I think Lily hit it right on the head; gender is really not the issue here. Its about her competence or lack of. Its not ideas or philsophy. Condeleeza Rice is about differences in ideas beliefs if you happen to be Black but I still think she is competent. Clarence Thomas is more like Palin for the majority of African Americans; serious philosphy differences and he is not that bright! Ask any lawyer who has read his opinions! They could have put up a more competent woman and there are quite a few (the former CEO from HP) but Palin Please! What bothers me more than anything is she hasn't improved; she hasn't become better. Too bad intelligence has once again taken a back seat to looks.
Reply
Thursday 06 August
By xbucfan
I basically agree with almost all of what you have said except for Carly Fiorina. HP was a very strong well run company before she became CEO and she nearly bankrupted it. Now that she is gone HP is once again a very strong company. Please see below:
Carly Fiorina
http://www.oreillynet.com/etel/blog/2006/10/where_did_hewlettpackard_get_t.html
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/06/us/politics/06fiorina.html?ex=1228363200&en=6bdb1888dcdc544b&ei=5087&excamp=GGPOcarlyfiorina&WT.srch=1&WT.mc_ev=click&WT.mc_id=PO-S-E-GG-NA-S-carly_fiorina
“What a blind spot this is in the McCain campaign to have elevated her stature and centrality in this way,” said Mr. Sonnenfeld (Yale), the senior associate dean for executive programs at the management school and one of Ms. Fiorina’s sharpest critics. “You couldn’t pick a worse, non-imprisoned C.E.O. to be your standard-bearer.”
Wait, is this the HP chief that was fired for hiring private investigators to spy on members of her own board because she was trying to find out who was leaking info to the press? If so, she sounds like a rethuglican to me.
I love her title, “RNC Victory Chair”. Sounds like something out of Communist China or North Korea