Radio Host Makes Shocking Claim About Shooting Hillary Clinton
Celebrating A TV Trailblazer
The game-design world is definitely male-dominated, which is why we're psyched that two women managed to pick up top honors at this year's Game Design Challenge at the Game Developer's Conference in San Francisco. What's even better? The game's about losing your virginity and they managed to design a game in significantly less time than their fellow competitors.
Heather Kelley and Erin Robinson stepped in with only 36 hours to create a game after another competitor left the contest because the theme "your first time" was a little too risqué for her employer.
The other contestants had a few weeks to get ready, but Kelley and Robinson rocked the contest with their multilevel game "Our First Times." In the game, players pick out outfits without snaggy zippers, shave their entire legs, circumvent garlic at dinner and buy condoms.
The game would be made for the Wii or perhaps iPhone, and sounds like more fun to talk about than it would be to actually play. Who wants to replay that evening over and over again?
Comments:
Add a comment
Monday 30 March
By CMAK
I think that, although it's great that women have made a success in a male-dominated field, this game is an absolute disgrace. A game about losing your virginity? seriously, how much more morally decrepit can society get? Instead of proving that women can be just as successful as men, the creators of this game have only confirmed the common stereotype that exists in so many male-oriented video games: that women are nothing more than the object of sexual desire, and they should pursue nothing beyond being deemed "sexually appealing". Promoting promiscuity like this is disgusting, unoriginal, and disappointing.
Reply
Wednesday 27 May
By Nathan
Yes, because sex is a sin right?
Did you even notice the bit about condoms in there.. Something which the USA (thanks to religious nutjobs trying to stifle any attempt at sex education) needs desperately. This game is probably the first time some kids in the USA have heard about condoms as a safe sex concept rather than "abstain!!".
Like all things if it offends you: feel free not to play it.
Friday 01 May
By jamie bailey
I really really want this game, when is it out? can i be in the sequal?
much love,
JamieB
xox
Reply
Friday 01 May
By revdrbong1
On the contrary, I'm glad these women are embracing their sexuality. Women are sexual creatures too! This is not the Victorian Age where women have no desires and masturbation causes death. Kudos ladies.
Reply
Friday 01 May
By Justin
The sequel is about having to navigate years of failed relationships until finding a guy that lays on the couch and gains 50 lbs in 5 years.
Reply
Friday 01 May
By Jim Stroud
CMAK,
As a father of a little princess, I totally agree with you. I wonder how many fathers with teenage daughters are in favor of this game?
Jim
Reply
Wednesday 06 May
By Kate
Wouldn't you rather have sex be an open topic, something you can talk about, than be something taboo? Because if your little princess plays a game about losing your virginity (provided she's old enough to play it when she gets ahold of it) it'll make it easier to talk about, because the game is funny, and it'll open up a situation in which you can have "the sex talk." If she grows up thinking that sex is dirty and bad, then she'll miss out on being informed about sex so when the time does come for her to lose her v-card, she'll know to be safe and wait until she's sure she won't regret it. Because losing one's virginity isn't a game, but a game can open the field to talk about it.
Monday 01 March
By Nikck Mitchelllll
Kate: I agree.
I can see where as a father, poster Jim Stroud could be worried if his daughter is a younger girl (as the Wii tends to aim towards a broader audience as a whole; i.e. my 5 and 7 yr old cousins have a Wii that they play often, and are actually quite good at most of the games especially given their age- 5 and 7- when I was that young Iwas on still on my NES/SNES, and I still wasn't as coordinated as these little guys are with aiming that remote!). But if your daughter is younger and not ready for sex-ed or "the talk" or whatever you would like to call it, then you simply just need to set boundries and make sure she doesn't come into contact with that game. Besides, games like that usually won't wind up in the possession of younger kids... I'm in my 20s now and just as recent as Xmas when I went to buy one of my my younger brothers a M-rated game (from best buy I think) the guy at the counter carded me.
On the flipside, if your daughter is reaching puberty or going through it and getting older, as a male and her father I'm not quite sure if you'd prefer having "the talk" or letting her get a feel and understanding of things and then being able to ask questions and communicate more freely without the tension. My parents never had "the talk" with me, and I was in a catholic school (not my choice honestly) at the age in which they went through sex-ed... and it was a joke for the most part. Kids lauging the entire class, it wasn't informative or helpful and I didn't sponge anything from the experience. I was smart enough once I reached that point where I knew enough from my own research and just not being a dope where I didn't do anything stupid, and I don't have any illegitimate kids or diseases so far. But a game like this seems innoncent-minded enough and with good intentions, and I don't see why it can't be a positive tool in sex ed. if used & monitored right. I can completely understand how anyone wouldn't want their 8-year-old playing a game about sex as wholel, but if they are playing a game like that then that isn't really their fault as much as it is whoever should be watching them.
Reply