We hope you like scary stories, because Philadelphia's menus are about to rival anything Stephen King has churned out. Fries swimming in saturated fat. Sauces oozing with calorie-laden cream. And pizza slices stewing in a fatty, high-sodium bloodbath. The horror, the horror! Hot on the heels of New York City's and California's laws requiring that calorie contents be listed on menus, Philadelphia -- the City of Brotherly Love, cheesesteaks and cream cheese -- just ruled that chain restaurants with more than 15 branches will have to inform diners of not only calories, but also saturated and trans fats, sodium and carbohydrate content. The ruling goes into effect on January 1, 2010. It's the nation's strictest nutritional labeling act yet, and the backlash has already begun.
In public statement, Margo G. Wootan, Nutritional Policy Director for the Center for Science in the Public Interest (CSPI), praised the law, saying, "There's no reason that consumers shouldn't see the nutritional price for what they're ordering, as well as the financial price. While it's no magic bullet, menu labeling is an easy thing that cities, counties and states can do to help their citizens eat healthfully, manage their weight, and avoid diet-related disease. It's also a useful incentive to the restaurant industry to expand the number and variety of healthy choices on their menus."
Click here to see what the other side has to say.
1,600 Calories...and Worth It?
Cosi Double Trouble Brownie Sundae, Calories: 1,594, Total Fat: 95 g
"One warm chocolate brownie & one blondie topped with two scoops of vanilla ice cream, whipped cream & a cherry." Seven nights on the treadmill, alternating between self-loathing and considering eating another one when you get home.
Laura Gilbert
Chili's Chocolate Chip Paradise Pie, Calories: 1,600, Total Fat: 78 g
Why have dessert when you can have novelty dessert?! It comes to your table fajita-style, sizzling in a cast iron skillet. And it's soaking in a vat of cinnamon butter. (Kind of like your heart.)
Southeast Star, Flickr
Romano's Macaroni Grill's Dessert Ravioli, Calories: 1,630, Total Fat: 74 g
This Italian-inspired concoction consists of peanuts, caramel and chocolate in fried pastries served with vanilla ice cream and, uh, more caramel. Don't worry, their New York Cheesecake only has 1,610 calories.
Watori Goro, Flickr
P.F. Chang's Great Wall of Chocolate with Raspberry Sauce, Calories: 2,240, Total Fat: 89 g
Well, it does have 20g of protein and we can write off the raspberry sauce as being in the fruit group, so it's sort of like salad, right?
tresposhepreppy.blogspot.com
Applebee's Sizzling Apple Pie with Ice Cream, Calories: 1,086, Total Fat: 56 g
There's nothing more American than warm apple pie -- that has over a thousand calories. The ice cream melts over the sizzling sugary crust, creating a hot-and-cold classic for your piehole.
Applebees.com
Baskin-Robbins Heath Bar Shake, Calories: 2,310, Total Fat: 108 g
We like our coffee like we like our men: blended with Heath ice cream and caramel and tastefully garnished with whipped cream and pieces of candy bars.
BaskinRobbins.com
Mimi's Café Chocolate Chip Pecan Pie, Calories: 1,879, Total Fat: 111 g
Why choose between pecan pie and a chocolate dessert when you can jam them both onto one plate? Plus, pecans = heart-healthy fats, right? Right? Come back here, we're having chest pains.
MimisCafe.com
Friendly's Caramel Fudge Brownie Sundae, Calories: 1,530, Total fat: 70 g
An Oreo brownie with five scoops of ice cream, hot fudge, caramel and whipped cream. Who could have guessed those ingredients would add up to such high digits? We blame new math.
Friendlys.com
Don Pablo's Chocolate Volcano Cake, Calories: 1,380, Total Fat: 77g
(Not to be confused with the 1997 film.) Take one chocolate cinnamon cake, drop it in a pool of molten chocolate butter sauce, scoop ice cream on top and shovel into maw. Burp.
Amazon
On the Border Chocolate Turtle Empanadas, Calories: 1,280, Fat: 729 g
Really, how better to wash down a meal of fried flour, refried beans and guac than a pile of pastries filled with chocolate, caramel and pecans. With ice cream. Delicioso!
ontheborder.com
Though proponents of the bill argue that it will help Philadelphia's citizens make more informed choices about what they eat, the Pennsylvania Restaurant Association has already requested a meeting with Mayor Michael Nutter in hopes of scoring a veto. Their argument: The new labeled menus will be too expensive, and may deter new restaurants from setting up shop in the city. According to Calorie Lab, Restaurant Association members would prefer to list nutritional content -- limited to just calorie counts -- on pamphlets or tray liners rather than on menus.
Could harm people with eating disorders
Another voice of opposition: eating disorder activists. In reference to the New York City laws, the blog Every Woman Has an Eating Disorder writes, "In-store menu labeling may encourage consumers to base more and more of their food decisions on caloric amounts, leading to greater food restriction, a pathway to clinical eating disorders. For those who already struggle with eating disorders, menu labeling can be emotionally triggering, as patients in recovery work quite diligently to shift from calorie counting." (It should be noted that Philadelphia's ruling calls for more detailed food content, which provides a more well-rounded picture than just calories.)
Is the public interested?
And then there are those who just, well, don't want to know what's going into their stomachs. The blogosphere is rampant with cynical or guilt-laden posts saying, "Thanks, but no thanks." Of the California calorie count ruling, Synaptic Domination asks, "Are our citizens so mentally challenged that we cannot rationally understand that a triple cheeseburger with a large fry and large soft drink is bad for us? Is a law requiring caloric counts of foods seriously going to deter the eating habits of our society?"
Too Full of Hands seconds that opinion: "Knowing how many calories there are in everything I order from a chain restaurant would be entirely 'too much information' for me to take. I'd rather eat in ignorance and not 'know' what I already suspect I should never have ordered in the first place!"
Despite the outcry, there are many who feel the posted information has kept them on their toes, nutritionally speaking. Says Sara Motejl, a New York City-based events director, "I honestly think it's a great law. It certainly has stopped me from grabbing a quick breakfast at Starbucks when I'm running late for work."
Cute Cupcakes
Ninja panda cupcakes
Flickr
Happy bug
Flickr
A sugary flower bed
Flickr
Ghoulishly delicious
Flickr
A horrifying treat
Flickr
Sweet, sweet hamburgers
Flickr
Hotdogs, anyone?
Flickr
Root bear float cupcake
Flickr
Monkey-cakes
Flickr
Deserted island dessert
Flickr
Other bills in the works
Love it or hate it, these new food laws are a sure sign of things to come. And those of you not living in Philadelphia, New York City or California might want to stock up on those ignorance-is-bliss bacon cheeseburgers. United States Senators Tom Carper of Delaware and Lisa Murkowski of Alaska have introduced the Labeling Education and Nutrition Act (conveniently dubbed the LEAN Act), which would demand disclosure on nutritional information nationwide. One catch: As Weighty Matters notes, compliant restaurants wouldn't be required to label menus, per se, but could bury those calorie counts on a brochure. The law would also pre-empt stricter laws like the one in Philadelphia, all but guaranteeing that this food fight is going to be steeped in controversy for years to come.
Tell us: Do you appreciate getting all the facts before you chow down? Do you think the info will help people make healthier eating decisions? Do you prefer your cheesecake with or without the guilt?

Comments:
Add a comment
Friday 14 November
By TioTony
Isn't it easy the way we pass feelgood laws that cost business owners tons of money (which costs will be passed on to us). If a person is so dense that they can't figure out what is high or low cal. they need to get hooked up to a feeding tube and let someone else decide how many calories to pump in.
Reply
Saturday 15 November
By michele
Go look at the nutrition information for fast food restaurants, and you might just be surprised what is high cal and what isn't...you need to do your homework, and having it posted onsite DOES help. Sure, a triple cheeseburger is intuitively high cal, but many chicken dishes and salads are just as bad, which might surprise many.
Friday 14 November
By Edward Pettit
Good luck with getting Nutter to veto it. He loves passing laws that force people to be more healthy. This kind of stuff drives me crazy. I hate it when lawmakers treat me like a child.
Reply
Saturday 15 November
By steve thompson
This is yet another attack on our personal freedoms. So politicians are so much smarter than us they now get to choose what we eat. I propose that we have a law that states politicians cannot pass a law that legislates morality or behavior in any way. If i want to smoke I will. If I want to ride a motorcycle without a helmet I will. Unite against big brother..
Reply
Saturday 15 November
By ThatGirl
This is crazy. I think the nutritional values should be available to people who want them, but not forced down the throats of those of us who are content to be fat and happy.
Reply
Saturday 15 November
By propchef
Our culinary history has proven conclusively that requiring labels and nutritional information DOES NOT deter poor choices. Over the last 20 years, we have legislated nutrition, all to a NEGATIVE effect. We, as a nation, are fatter now than ever, and it grows every year.
Teach nutrition in school starting at an early age. Give people discounts on health insurance for maintaining good weight and good cholesterol levels. We need to mold habits, not give them something else to NOT read.
Reply
Saturday 15 November
By Dana
Absolutely the restaurants need to have nutritional information on the menu or at least by request. When I was losing weight it was so frustrating to go into an eating establishment and ask for this and be told there was no information on their food. How can I make the best choices when I do not have the correct information. It's not as simple as people think. Go and look at the calories in the Arbies sandwiches. The ones you would think would be low cal are the highest and the other way around. There is no way to guess the calorie content of something.
Reply
Saturday 15 November
By tese42s
Somebody should enforce a law that makes our government agencies that inspect our food, imported or otherwise, do their jobs. I mean for the American people not China and other countries.
Reply
Saturday 15 November
By Jim
Big Brother has arrived!
Reply
Saturday 15 November
By AL MYER
I don't care about the menus. If I want to eat healthy I eat at home and select what to eat. If I am in a hurry or just want to endulge myself with something bad like a Philly Cheese steak or a Bacon Double Cheeseburger I will. As long as this is not a regular diet, it is not any worse than the occasional cheese cake or piece of pie. Eat smart and the H**l with what the menue board says.
Thanks
Reply
Saturday 15 November
By pdgrovebaskets
One more stupid law by the government. It's like prohabition. The government is trying to regulate common sense and all they're doing is making alot of work and cost for the food industry which will be passed onto the customer. Anyone with half a brain know which items have more fat and cholesterol. The public is bombarded with dietary info these days. You can't touch a magazine, internet or television without all sorts of diet and food into. Just as much as the public is getting overweight, they are also becoming OBSESSED with dieting. And in the long run, the studies show that most diets don't work, so why all the regulations on everything when it doesn't work? Whatever happened to go old common sense. That's what all my ancestors used and they did just fine, several living to almost a 100 years old. Everything in moderation and a well balanced diet, that's the key and you don't see the government making another stupid law about that.
Reply
Saturday 15 November
By Caveman
This isn't about prohibiting people from being the disgusting slobs that most of Americans have become. It's about "labeling". I'm all for stopping companies from spewing all the BS. Like Snapple is made from "the best stuff on earth"...since when is high fructose corn syrup the "best stuff on earth"? It's man made and contributes immensely to heart disease and stroke...god forbid the public knows. Just keep letting the giant corporations poison the ignorant from their childhood to adult without anyone really knowing or fighting back.
Saturday 15 November
By granbybootman
Get used to it........wait and see all the legislation passed by a fillibuster proof Congress!!!!! Pretty soon we won't even have to think!
Reply
Saturday 15 November
By BIG BILL
YOU ARE 100% CORRECT. SO MANY PEOPLE DON'T HAVE A CLUE.
Saturday 15 November
By sk
Two things:
1) The Philly mayor is a NUTTER! LOL I love it!
2) I think that the law is a great thing! People will realize that ordering a Cobb salad isn't healthy, that a tuna melt will cost you 1000 calories and a days worth of sat fat, and that even low-cal ranch is disgustingly fatty. They'll think twice about their food options, will teach their children better eating habits, and will reduce the astronomically high rate of obesity and obesity-related diseases (i.e., diabetes, hypertension).
3) READ THE ARTICLE! The Philly law isn't for small businesses! It's for those with 15 or more stores in the city! That's pretty much ONLY fast-food restaurants. You can still go to the mom and pop store and guzzle in the grease with ignorance and abandon.
Reply
Saturday 15 November
By parplex
People are gaining weight because it has been a free-for-all on what goes into food. As long as it is cheaper companies will put it in, and unhealthy food is cheaper. This will make companies not use the crappiest products they can find because its cheaper. It will also force those companies that pretend to make health food, show how "healthy" it really is. The next time you get veggies at a resturant and they are nothing near as good as you can make, remember their secret ingredients. a little salt, pepper, and a TON of butter and sugar.
Reply
Saturday 15 November
By jcooper
I would like to have this information. I do splurge sometimes, but would appreciate having something to go on that willl allow me to avoid an item that contains my whole day's total calorie or fat content. Some things are obviously overloaded, but others are not and I'd like to be able to spot the sneaky ones.
Reply
Saturday 15 November
By Mr E
The law is not telling you that you can't eat the food.
The law is making the consumer aware of the fat and calorie content of food.
It is your CHOICE if you want to eat the food or not.
Reply
Saturday 15 November
By Barbara
We can't make our own decisions, so the government will make them for us. Really, what's next? How long before it gets to something you care about?
Reply
Saturday 15 November
By Amy
Like some others, I could care less what these menus read. I eat 6 meals a day, 42 meals a week. 41 of them are clean and in program. The other one meal a week I eat is anything I want. If I want an 8000-calorie half a pizza, I'm eating it without any regret. I'm a 36-year old woman with a 2-year old and a 1-year old. I'm 14% body fat and work my butt off. If I want to sit down and eat a bunch of high-calorie crap for a meal, I'm happy to do it--even knowing how bad it is for me. Aside from the fact that it's a pain for the businesses, I say bring it on! I just don't care! :D
Reply